1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
|
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <stick@gk2.sk>) id 1YBUYv-00085F-Ph
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 14 Jan 2015 20:29:09 +0000
X-ACL-Warn:
Received: from mail-we0-f175.google.com ([74.125.82.175])
by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1YBUYs-0005mp-2W
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 14 Jan 2015 20:29:09 +0000
Received: by mail-we0-f175.google.com with SMTP id k11so10946215wes.6
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:28:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to
:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=5hG6v+ZACnB9plq5+04nnED0VpPxReqCJh+oRozkcPE=;
b=RVo8GKznlzmGjAGKeTrYOstGowAmGE/SFfLBENCfbkoRXv90eEvpvRFf+1FvfBf9A0
vxVNXlZ8fdHG588WTfmJajv6MIhtLIS/cCV2Oxc4h5pdKtR/1TJYcOyrt1WU2Ngri3xr
3ACJFnVNrISIVbpxMUO3/xGlOi74N1E/WKgk3EQLWSD5XOTTjbxSoVLlPC7iZWxPHFrQ
PBRAEoCWgzcIpNIEztm4hiy40g7CuS/G0uaYBe1OT53/bQgVxAdkYsrE13NpUJe5CRa6
mCPEnwQK7X7peiETS4YW/66fuA2wdIx+3yvrP4LIZoVDdZApj7nAOiZ8lActDgKq9lJY
pDNg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmqZlcFZn+bMuv6GEJqb14VnclMK7jMIZRKwWc0gXEsuEu5a4MHJn0uktSijAT0YbTOGRz0
X-Received: by 10.180.205.163 with SMTP id lh3mr54177962wic.63.1421265538321;
Wed, 14 Jan 2015 11:58:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tetra.site ([185.68.216.100])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id g2sm23347015wjn.11.2015.01.14.11.58.56
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Wed, 14 Jan 2015 11:58:57 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54B6CA7E.3070600@gk2.sk>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 20:58:54 +0100
From: Pavol Rusnak <stick@gk2.sk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jeffrey Paul <jp@eeqj.com>, devrandom <c1.sf-bitcoin@niftybox.net>
References: <CABETNRtquBWEZZ=jOcWojcgMTpjU5nWP9p74DArLxOXqqQT7og@mail.gmail.com> <1421257150.8969.4.camel@niftybox.net>
<6E575287-887C-4628-834C-282B67AFAA94@eeqj.com>
In-Reply-To: <6E575287-887C-4628-834C-282B67AFAA94@eeqj.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
X-Headers-End: 1YBUYs-0005mp-2W
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net,
Ruben de Vries <ruben@blocktrail.com>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] convention/standard for sorting public
keys for p2sh multisig transactions
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 20:29:09 -0000
On 14/01/15 20:27, Jeffrey Paul wrote:
> To clarify: the raw bytes of the public key itself, not the ascii base58 representation of the pubkey hash - right?
Could you give an example of two pubkeys where the following condition
is met?
raw(pubkey1) > raw(pubkey2) and base58(pubkey1) < base58(pubkey2)
--
Best Regards / S pozdravom,
Pavol Rusnak <stick@gk2.sk>
|
