summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/9c/40c1a991fcddd4140c84f94a44169ab76de1da
blob: 12244129e7eba65355efbb81128a6f2e8cfc4144 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <rdwnj@yahoo.com>) id 1Z01cH-0006dV-A8
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 03 Jun 2015 05:53:29 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of yahoo.com
	designates 67.195.87.236 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=67.195.87.236; envelope-from=rdwnj@yahoo.com;
	helo=nm49-vm6.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com; 
Received: from nm49-vm6.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com ([67.195.87.236])
	by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1Z01cG-0008UC-2q
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 03 Jun 2015 05:53:29 +0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by nm49.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
	03 Jun 2015 05:53:22 -0000
Received: from [98.137.12.174] by nm49.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
	03 Jun 2015 05:50:33 -0000
Received: from [98.137.12.202] by tm13.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
	03 Jun 2015 05:50:33 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1010.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
	03 Jun 2015 05:50:33 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-4
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 808268.11270.bm@omp1010.mail.gq1.yahoo.com
X-YMail-OSG: HCo_MLMVM1kyVJBV.9aDDfmTYFMd285.Fx4P5.IU_6C9vSLqy1z8vCz_j4cDRIR
	XmF3e05B6X2SnADFIZgmfrfeJDdCDUcRexC0btdh6BGYksRU2l_iOZKdt_.BkQz2EO1E.1wIFWfA
	JqLdiA56jMpVMIDTq4oLy2u5thlfv8M3eeAdL.TRJAji9Bdge_LokRTdQrg511rA.xiZiWnINazT
	iwW2qa0ndCeVhfnzRiSRixSJ6CuKL7hLVaNiGjEkVm1oFSnygJkySUxP2B7Fsx.W8h55dF7VCs73
	RSoqPlDPbCUJxhgnzwTzsuTwfYafRCllY6PMZz4zSMJEKJFTS.5Sc0h0XK540H13g._AJ3J2pedh
	PS4Yl_sQ5WGaz8Hj4U1mQTTCCaaxyaB.UOZgokftg3LHezDonvUxCGznkHbRNVcAyBTAuwX95S.a
	SQ8GafKX_XSB97JWNyANOUOXeRpMyOWF8arJfdw5G3TezIIBJ.pKZO1bF8hDNU8BjM6iA4mW9hCR
	fzsC8QWuNSaA2
Received: by 98.137.12.54; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 05:50:33 +0000 
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 05:50:32 +0000 (UTC)
From: Ron <rdwnj@yahoo.com>
To: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net"
	<bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <2122164151.2048223.1433310632572.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <mailman.263582.1433245437.2287.bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
References: <mailman.263582.1433245437.2287.bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_2048222_1625053647.1433310632569"
X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	1.0 HK_RANDOM_REPLYTO      Reply-To username looks random
	1.0 HK_RANDOM_FROM         From username looks random
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.6 HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM      Envelope sender username looks random
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(rdwnj[at]yahoo.com)
	-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
	no trust [67.195.87.236 listed in list.dnswl.org]
	-0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
	domain
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1Z01cG-0008UC-2q
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin-development Digest, Vol 49,
	Issue 16
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Ron <rdwnj@yahoo.com>
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 05:53:29 -0000

------=_Part_2048222_1625053647.1433310632569
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


      Subject: Bitcoin-development Digest, Vol 49, Issue 16
   =C2=A0 1. Re: Proposed alternatives to the 20MB step (Eric Voskuil)
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 17:09:10 -0700
From: Eric Voskuil <eric@voskuil.org>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed alternatives to the 20MB
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 step
To: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>, J?r?me Legoupil
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 <jjlegoupil@gmail.com>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <556CF426.3030204@voskuil.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"iso-8859-1"

On 06/01/2015 08:55 AM, Mike Hearn wrote:
>> Decentralization is the core of Bitcoin's security model and thus
that's what gives Bitcoin its value.
> No. Usage is what gives Bitcoin value.

Nonsense.

Visa, Dollar, Euro, Yuan, Peso have usage.

The value in Bitcoin is *despite* it's far lesser usage.

Yes, the price is a function of demand, but demand is a function of
utility. Despite orders of magnitude less usage than state currencies,
Bitcoin has utility. This premium *only* exists due to its lack of
centralized control. I would not work full time, or at all, on Bitcoin
if it was not for decentralization; nor would I hold any of it. I doubt
anyone would show an interest in Bitcoin if it was not decentralized. If
it centralized even you would be forced to find something else to do,
because Bitcoin "usage" would drop to zero.

> It's kind of maddening that I have to point this out. Decentralisation
is a means to an end.

No, it was/is the primary objective.
...
e
________________________________________________________I agree Eric, but I=
 would add that demand is more a function of one's=C2=A0 lack=C2=A0of faith=
 in one's government and its fiat currency.=C2=A0 The value of Bitcoin is=
=20
its independence and constancy.=C2=A0 Its value doesn't change, only the wo=
rth=20
or worthlessness of corrupt states and their currencies that it's compared=
=20
to / exchanged with.=C2=A0 I hesitate to say money since money is supposed =
to=20
be a store of value over time.
Ron




  
------=_Part_2048222_1625053647.1433310632569
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html><body><div style=3D"color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:ti=
mes new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:14px"><br>  <div id=3D"yui_=
3_16_0_1_1433160141753_29936" style=3D"font-family: times new roman, new yo=
rk, times, serif; font-size: 14px;"> <div id=3D"yui_3_16_0_1_1433160141753_=
29935" style=3D"font-family: HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Aria=
l, Lucida Grande, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"> <div id=3D"yui_3_16_0_1_14=
33160141753_29934" dir=3D"ltr"> <hr size=3D"1">  <font id=3D"yui_3_16_0_1_1=
433160141753_29933" face=3D"Arial" size=3D"2"> <b id=3D"yui_3_16_0_1_143316=
0141753_29968"><span id=3D"yui_3_16_0_1_1433160141753_29967" style=3D"font-=
weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> Bitcoin-development Digest, Vol 49, Issu=
e 16<br> </font> </div> <div id=3D"yui_3_16_0_1_1433160141753_29937" class=
=3D"y_msg_container">&nbsp;  1. Re: Proposed alternatives to the 20MB step =
(Eric Voskuil)<br>---------------------------------------------------------=
-------------<br><br>Message: 1<br>Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 17:09:10 -0700<br=
>From: Eric Voskuil &lt;<a ymailto=3D"mailto:eric@voskuil.org" href=3D"mail=
to:eric@voskuil.org">eric@voskuil.org</a>&gt;<br>Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-deve=
lopment] Proposed alternatives to the 20MB<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; step<br>To=
: Mike Hearn &lt;<a id=3D"yui_3_16_0_1_1433160141753_30609" ymailto=3D"mail=
to:mike@plan99.net" href=3D"mailto:mike@plan99.net">mike@plan99.net</a>&gt;=
, J?r?me Legoupil<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &lt;<a id=3D"yui_3_16_0_1_143316014=
1753_30607" ymailto=3D"mailto:jjlegoupil@gmail.com" href=3D"mailto:jjlegoup=
il@gmail.com">jjlegoupil@gmail.com</a>&gt;<br>Cc: Bitcoin Dev &lt;<a id=3D"=
yui_3_16_0_1_1433160141753_29984" ymailto=3D"mailto:bitcoin-development@lis=
ts.sourceforge.net" href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.ne=
t">bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net</a>&gt;<br>Message-ID: &lt;<a =
id=3D"yui_3_16_0_1_1433160141753_30612" ymailto=3D"mailto:556CF426.3030204@=
voskuil.org" href=3D"mailto:556CF426.3030204@voskuil.org">556CF426.3030204@=
voskuil.org</a>&gt;<br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"iso-8859-1"<br>=
<br>On 06/01/2015 08:55 AM, Mike Hearn wrote:<br>&gt;&gt; Decentralization =
is the core of Bitcoin's security model and thus<br>that's what gives Bitco=
in its value.<br>&gt; No. Usage is what gives Bitcoin value.<br><br>Nonsens=
e.<br><br>Visa, Dollar, Euro, Yuan, Peso have usage.<br><br>The value in Bi=
tcoin is *despite* it's far lesser usage.<br><br>Yes, the price is a functi=
on of demand, but demand is a function of<br>utility. Despite orders of mag=
nitude less usage than state currencies,<br>Bitcoin has utility. This premi=
um *only* exists due to its lack of<br>centralized control. I would not wor=
k full time, or at all, on Bitcoin<br>if it was not for decentralization; n=
or would I hold any of it. I doubt<br>anyone would show an interest in Bitc=
oin if it was not decentralized. If<br>it centralized even you would be for=
ced to find something else to do,<br>because Bitcoin "usage" would drop to =
zero.<br><br>&gt; It's kind of maddening that I have to point this out. Dec=
entralisation<br>is a means to an end.<br><br><div id=3D"yui_3_16_0_1_14331=
60141753_30191">No, it was/is the primary objective.<br></div><div id=3D"yu=
i_3_16_0_1_1433160141753_30193">...<br></div>e<br><div id=3D"yui_3_16_0_1_1=
433160141753_30189">_______________________________________________________=
_</div><div dir=3D"ltr" id=3D"yui_3_16_0_1_1433160141753_30158">I agree Eri=
c, but I would add that demand is more a function of one's&nbsp; lack&nbsp;=
</div><div id=3D"yui_3_16_0_1_1433160141753_30460" dir=3D"ltr">of faith in =
one's government and its fiat currency.&nbsp; The value of Bitcoin is <br><=
/div><div id=3D"yui_3_16_0_1_1433160141753_30251" dir=3D"ltr">its independe=
nce and constancy.&nbsp; Its value doesn't change, only the worth <br></div=
><div id=3D"yui_3_16_0_1_1433160141753_30297" dir=3D"ltr">or worthlessness =
of corrupt states and their currencies that it's compared <br></div><div id=
=3D"yui_3_16_0_1_1433160141753_30457" dir=3D"ltr">to / exchanged with.&nbsp=
; I hesitate to say money since money is supposed to <br></div><div id=3D"y=
ui_3_16_0_1_1433160141753_30564" dir=3D"ltr">be a store of value over time.=
</div><div id=3D"yui_3_16_0_1_1433160141753_30523" dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><d=
iv id=3D"yui_3_16_0_1_1433160141753_30507" dir=3D"ltr">Ron<br></div><br><br=
><br><br></div> </div> </div>  </div></body></html>
------=_Part_2048222_1625053647.1433310632569--