summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/9a/a2f351b852a24f6f288344e0fc320dd7d6e95e
blob: a795245d5bf3987afece604d89f356e3b1cc98f3 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
Return-Path: <alex.mizrahi@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58A81B4A
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu,  6 Apr 2017 15:36:26 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-qk0-f171.google.com (mail-qk0-f171.google.com
	[209.85.220.171])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52519159
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu,  6 Apr 2017 15:36:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qk0-f171.google.com with SMTP id h67so40694686qke.0
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 06 Apr 2017 08:36:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; 
	bh=jSQs7C5VhZN4Zh0s9GgPl7I5LqEswKsVyiaf2E+cKa4=;
	b=JZlxWYsQaeKjN4/JcnO3xvLkGDN/ySPbCctVQx5jHx9KKA+P/FwdVEeK3grmGPLgSh
	iWTl15XqrtvEmsU5OAMAwR9+C1nAUx8m667uHR00ehE1mi52WMfRMvR7+rqqLtdsm3Gx
	osqHa5YwuVjV+ZQIsUuBx0HSyvq1OC/Y88mQ9ZUjN5+p/sQ6a3tDGj9bcr4rLw/Ub3fl
	GldOlCIMoGs+wVFPDsG18SNXNIq3dBNSsXdeN1uyBqxSZsemPujFZwy5tD7wTB20RmjX
	01tAxwZQxVAoRimkCD4XqOUQrz9NRwZDCaadghf66MdKxnY5cRo5+JqwJG5TBeGxu6n0
	0wSw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to;
	bh=jSQs7C5VhZN4Zh0s9GgPl7I5LqEswKsVyiaf2E+cKa4=;
	b=X0vGrIHwQ6B0Hdyqtg/4xnrUac3ITx94xOxN6aEGjoTKSY4eUFtX/k0CKyLoB6ggyi
	+xKPHXbW3mVETT4R92v0zNqqe0w7VgQ0Mczyxwkg4SuEAVG86UBZZ/RHTAj2rCA+wU9G
	qPtyEZl1gt6HJkhdFlkZ7U/UsywVMdqUKjdi/gjuReUO7QX6/qQNCli5LS818BtH8cy3
	zaWXERBfvtJHbHuXm5hrl8TxHND+lPF2ra/ZeoSZetkO/cuNYYV/hqbU6Jnz8A7aGldL
	u+r8NmVjp69S/U2Z0esdEhFUtoElJ3/H4cFJclZoy1ZjRzsaaM+68UP0jQnsF9UEdFMj
	XiAQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/5/IBpR0qjGmmN13uRLYbDa/Bbjva/uJTih6JxwcBQXpy/qrv14cLAtdT2qyRhjKdepfo0Y8pAY9D9sMg==
X-Received: by 10.55.165.2 with SMTP id o2mr6768776qke.306.1491492984394; Thu,
	06 Apr 2017 08:36:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.55.55.79 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 08:36:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20170406024910.GA1271@savin.petertodd.org>
References: <CAAS2fgR84898xD0nyq7ykJnB7qkdoCJYnFg6z5WZEUu0+-=mMA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20170406023123.GA1071@savin.petertodd.org>
	<CA+KqGkqSxeAUZFVFqM_QkEWcGFHgZXwGuOE==7HpXp1+D_Tj3Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<20170406024910.GA1271@savin.petertodd.org>
From: Alex Mizrahi <alex.mizrahi@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 18:36:23 +0300
Message-ID: <CAE28kURiL3OVzwdpZ2yZvqc-QB-1fxGnCm-G49OJ+y3OF2qtUQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c05fde8853fac054c814587
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, 
	RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP proposal: Inhibiting a covert attack on the
 Bitcoin POW function
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2017 15:36:26 -0000

--94eb2c05fde8853fac054c814587
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

> Agreed! There's no benefit to Bitcoin for having it - one way or the other
> miners are going to destroy ~12BTC/block worth of energy. Meanwhile it
> appears
> to have lead to something like a year of stupid political bullshit based
> on a
> secret advantage - there's no reason to invite a repeat of this episode.


But is it even possible to completely remove ASICBOOST optimization
possibility?

--94eb2c05fde8853fac054c814587
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div=
>=C2=A0</div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;b=
order-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=3D"">
</span>Agreed! There&#39;s no benefit to Bitcoin for having it - one way or=
 the other<br>
miners are going to destroy ~12BTC/block worth of energy. Meanwhile it appe=
ars<br>
to have lead to something like a year of stupid political bullshit based on=
 a<br>
secret advantage - there&#39;s no reason to invite a repeat of this episode=
.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>But is it even possible to completely rem=
ove ASICBOOST optimization possibility?</div><div><br></div></div></div></d=
iv>

--94eb2c05fde8853fac054c814587--