1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
|
Return-Path: <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 323671CE9
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 5 Oct 2015 12:16:05 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-wi0-f179.google.com (mail-wi0-f179.google.com
[209.85.212.179])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AED9CB
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 5 Oct 2015 12:16:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wicgb1 with SMTP id gb1so116635724wic.1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 05 Oct 2015 05:16:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
bh=uLbdqqMWuNL+NnGA8sdf06qY0rf7GGJNlXHb4N/b2kQ=;
b=PZpXT17I6VpQJD3f38ZcZ5jo9girDJs0nlFkTecPdfHvpfMtJF9NxqcjU9uVpwyFvr
OcWJCESwuPAl+JOKowYABrRXEHirYjpvoWAM0XuaXipveAc9/A492+NU6sbjsdsXReGt
WI2uryQt39S0ZReGIxZDcwlXLhqKjFkaGRSLKGQVp0cd3ZD+6fGz5Xjw38TIwN3buJai
y4/t1DCs5vUVbfcIJmnAtPfXP9pAGnTodSym/U2UYORauNXq++qVMN5Lh9drSVYgl+Q8
/xpt+dZDZIx7kCPOum05beJxHt8nLGDdjanxVVBYLZB/M7arhVdKuWC37YIjCm3IcwRP
3AUg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn77ujoyEAU47IvUfEDwy7mixTWGVi2KIAipC4aAbwa899u9wUNL/F3PNQl+UAKxGUI/1Ve
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.113.131 with SMTP id iy3mr16235323wjb.133.1444047363359;
Mon, 05 Oct 2015 05:16:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.114.199 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 05:16:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.114.199 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 05:16:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAP63atY+yH5BinWYAyxkqER5wA9Lj6pFC0LritSDLcDuBVbXrg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKfs=Z_jVKtjeSHM1a6n+ch6WcazkshmDgN4Wi1K_kLBUE4o4w@mail.gmail.com>
<BLU436-SMTP132FA09C343ACB7C82E6C98C64B0@phx.gbl>
<CA+w+GKT0Th4Tpk=cCxfJwsMdB5NLrARACU3_qiRn4Ns7z_PXYQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CADm_WcaVbj98G9acqbwUxYudHhWh01FLpm5KgL3rqHffd5WCXg@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+w+GKTkos5gwZmN_1c7wUFmJgZMJGzZbaZeWO=Rwt3Ta3Zbzw@mail.gmail.com>
<CABm2gDp1r78OtM=MfHqvV17-6N=nCG+hFOwqL0R6DHz9SjLmsg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAP63atY+yH5BinWYAyxkqER5wA9Lj6pFC0LritSDLcDuBVbXrg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 14:16:03 +0200
Message-ID: <CABm2gDqi2tHHVN6NqsGwhUka+Scza-UcLe=_UhxZx8hvytt5BQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment_Elbaz?= <clem.ds@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1130cc4221d30d05215a7a46
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Let's deploy BIP65 CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY!
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 12:16:05 -0000
--001a1130cc4221d30d05215a7a46
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Oct 5, 2015 2:08 PM, "Cl=C3=A9ment Elbaz" <clem.ds@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It will get correct results about :
> - the existence every block
> - the existence of every transaction
>
> It will get incorrect results :
> - about the nature of some transactions
Given the assumptions above, only of transactions without enough
confirmations.
> - and therefore, about the balances of some wallets.
Not if the wallet waits for enough confirmations.
--001a1130cc4221d30d05215a7a46
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<p dir=3D"ltr"><br>
On Oct 5, 2015 2:08 PM, "Cl=C3=A9ment Elbaz" <<a href=3D"mailt=
o:clem.ds@gmail.com">clem.ds@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> It will get correct results about :<br>
> - the existence every block<br>
> - the existence of every transaction<br>
><br>
> It will get incorrect results :<br>
> - about the nature of some transactions</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">Given the assumptions above, only of transactions without en=
ough confirmations.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">> - and therefore, about the balances of some wallets.</p=
>
<p dir=3D"ltr">Not if the wallet waits for enough confirmations.<br>
</p>
--001a1130cc4221d30d05215a7a46--
|
