1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
|
Return-Path: <james.hilliard1@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2509994F
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:31:27 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-oi0-f54.google.com (mail-oi0-f54.google.com
[209.85.218.54])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A485817E
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:31:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-oi0-f54.google.com with SMTP id w81so73162741oig.1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:31:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=UsGs3mLEONeUFLBlUEPELuK+qwzQipzY0YUhqfgHUIc=;
b=lcuyZXprxHxO07rE6CepaqpuIQNsnhBUEOnWOhkN04sB8fmE4LhFUexBfm7zoEuC8Z
Lipuh57tvogbeiupiQ8aDJZ/AKvIY9FgWKB6aYVbCCu5f0q4tWw5hR3416Rz91WwpUCI
NU1NUhmODOmwxk3NJWWr5OWrzas8Xmn5HP2E6yElXcqk/OsA6nz2bljEh/nj9XZeT48w
o/rxrleaetlGGFdju4umXAnYJ3AJEpggZ719zNwxWuksK5jga6leCZtwEkkxb4G4boW0
8Fx9bNIq1/JugEfgSy67yTIG2DsZ9wmV9ZViSPh6g9rC/19g+mtE210qpC5zk+X4/2+5
xIEg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=UsGs3mLEONeUFLBlUEPELuK+qwzQipzY0YUhqfgHUIc=;
b=KqSpPtLMmjgclhcp7dr9hL6E0ZTLNP39YsUzg3hJP6U/KQWyjIgzm9kk5AVERgxfA7
iy5ICaOld6DGIJBsx2ZjJvY1DTc4Uhw1UDVQa3lv1s8yG09iT1z+V4K4mYm9TMxNtxnv
+xZ6TUmJoZ5W3gJrjappPHRFLJgE/d6MFoznzcaA7weTwmjU17aymnOQfFE2o5vtsqSZ
+0uvByg5j2ZQ+CNmXAWi0czly6TvwxCMMvyr7a9dOXjV7UXW+O5VSon/nV2fH8X2Wl6H
ZmS+L+SEz1BzI4P+pedX/H0yB8+zTmpkQ1uZ1fJUU5K9LETqoYcx5uM+DgXTIz1SLAaf
JUfQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H0JcG7recK6lwVcBMKJAaLbUcbQo73EY7eDhL+j7vVAB4kOvBZciBJ5gZ5l2DSF26ul6Jcj56WY3UIzvQ==
X-Received: by 10.202.222.84 with SMTP id v81mr3136233oig.194.1490315486034;
Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:31:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.77.196 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:31:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAPg+sBjrjUFJZnCtmcvZYs_pc4T3YzU_jtK+eZANyGKSLavrXg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <SC1P152MB1648D0F9DF4279C49D755233F53F0@SC1P152MB1648.LAMP152.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
<CAPg+sBjrjUFJZnCtmcvZYs_pc4T3YzU_jtK+eZANyGKSLavrXg@mail.gmail.com>
From: James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 19:31:25 -0500
Message-ID: <CADvTj4o=_X2OK8YTtRdrY=8tgxg9Km3PBfdPZ=KAFctHk4Ctwg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Issolated Bitcoin Nodes
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:31:27 -0000
There were bridge nodes being run on testnet at one point to prevent
forks https://github.com/jl2012/bitcoin/commit/9717d856e72baa939d4b273f0a56e6009978e11b
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 7:20 PM, Pieter Wuille via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Juan Garavaglia via bitcoin-dev
> <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> Long story short, when nodes 0.13+ receive blocks from 0.13+ nodes all is
>> ok, and those blocks propagate to older nodes with no issues. But when a
>> block tries to be propagated from bitcoind 0.12.+ to newer ones those blocks
>> are NOT being propagated to the peers with newer versions while these newer
>> blocks are being propagated to peers with older versions with no issues.
>>
>> My conclusion is that we have a backward compatibility issue between 0.13.X+
>> and older versions.
>
> Hello Juan,
>
> this is expected behaviour. Nodes with segwit active only download
> blocks from other segwit peers, as old peers cannot provide the
> witness data they need to verify the blocks.
>
> --
> Pieter
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
|
