summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/99/e5090acb06ed607fb1a2f5f8443593c60fb98d
blob: 0573daa5c9ea43b2009e1bad3c76bb1a5a729a96 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <andyparkins@gmail.com>) id 1SfoCb-0001Lo-DF
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sat, 16 Jun 2012 08:17:49 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 74.125.82.53 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=74.125.82.53; envelope-from=andyparkins@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-wg0-f53.google.com; 
Received: from mail-wg0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53])
	by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1SfoCa-00070d-ND
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sat, 16 Jun 2012 08:17:49 +0000
Received: by wgbfm10 with SMTP id fm10so3249859wgb.10
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Sat, 16 Jun 2012 01:17:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.193.129 with SMTP id k1mr4343473wen.201.1339834662369;
	Sat, 16 Jun 2012 01:17:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from grissom.localnet ([91.84.15.31])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fm1sm8802915wib.10.2012.06.16.01.17.41
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
	Sat, 16 Jun 2012 01:17:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net, Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 09:17:39 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0-1-686-pae; KDE/4.7.4; i686; ; )
References: <CA+8xBpdD31koaVBh1RuDZKH1sygr8z10K=bPz8DepqYOa8i6yg@mail.gmail.com>
	<1339810493.15660.YahooMailNeo@web121004.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <1339810493.15660.YahooMailNeo@web121004.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201206160917.39752.andyparkins@gmail.com>
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(andyparkins[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1SfoCa-00070d-ND
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed new P2P command and response:
	getcmds, cmdlist
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 08:17:49 -0000

On Saturday 16 Jun 2012 02:34:53 Amir Taaki wrote:
> Introspection/command discovery is nice, but I would prefer it to be
> immediately done in the first version exchange so no assumptions as to
> how a network is operating need to be made.

That would need a change of the current version message.  So why not make 
the change be simply: one of the service bits indicates that "getcmds" is 
available?

Then the version message doesn't need any on-the-wire change.



Andy

-- 
Dr Andy Parkins
andyparkins@gmail.com