1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
|
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <mh.in.england@gmail.com>) id 1YyLB8-0005yM-Ek
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Fri, 29 May 2015 14:22:30 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.212.178 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.212.178; envelope-from=mh.in.england@gmail.com;
helo=mail-wi0-f178.google.com;
Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com ([209.85.212.178])
by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1YyLB7-00043Q-Bw
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Fri, 29 May 2015 14:22:30 +0000
Received: by wivl4 with SMTP id l4so19089277wiv.1
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Fri, 29 May 2015 07:22:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.9.161 with SMTP id a1mr823975wjb.39.1432909343326; Fri,
29 May 2015 07:22:23 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: mh.in.england@gmail.com
Received: by 10.194.143.9 with HTTP; Fri, 29 May 2015 07:22:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABsx9T2-NypB1g4-5wsvR_CUXBoHi5yR3VsivrGsn_pLbEd+-g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <16096345.A1MpJQQkRW@crushinator>
<CABsx9T3-zxCAagAS0megd06xvG5n-3tUL9NUK9TT3vt7XNL9Tg@mail.gmail.com>
<CANEZrP3VCaFsW4+gPm2kCJ9z7oVUZYVaeNf=_cJWEWwh4ZxiPQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CABsx9T21zjHyO-nh1aSBM3z4Bg015O0rOfYq7=Sy4mf=QxUVQA@mail.gmail.com>
<CANEZrP2BaKwhpPgcUHWAHswOmUeFLgEk4ysrn4+73qNzWDJ=yQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CABsx9T3nCJ-w_v-yEbEE2Ytb+xC65mhYqhoAhoOHw9tkPpG0TA@mail.gmail.com>
<CANEZrP1qH+zucYsGrMgnfi99e61Edxaj+xm=u_xYXga1g0WzJQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAE-z3OVmw+0doCe0hmYE6A1D61h0AUh4Mtnf5Fg1e4zQBkpraQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CANEZrP0psA7hcJdKdA-r01UEt7ig3O-9vjwBMqKSEq-csu0hPQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CABsx9T23r_y2R9OEgqb3AAZf47Hh8BUJncjxxmPp5v_9uKEiqQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAE-z3OXEGcUYYAsqqrVMQw=XA=5dt9u7XHDmuzhMJ8OkZ+k3yg@mail.gmail.com>
<CABsx9T2-NypB1g4-5wsvR_CUXBoHi5yR3VsivrGsn_pLbEd+-g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 16:22:22 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: huw9PJ6-PhktfUUPxwTZB6uM_aE
Message-ID: <CANEZrP11O796UAAZj0mgPLtme97kiOsg1dU3WjFx0Z2yisQ3ag@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
To: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5d34fa6788b805173934a5
X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(mh.in.england[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1YyLB7-00043Q-Bw
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed alternatives to the 20MB step
function
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 14:22:30 -0000
--047d7b5d34fa6788b805173934a5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> And looking at the version (aka user-agent) strings of publicly reachable
> nodes on the network.
> (e.g. see the count at https://getaddr.bitnodes.io/nodes/ )
>
Yeah, though FYI Luke informed me last week that I somehow managed to take
out the change to the user-agent string in Bitcoin XT, presumably I made a
mistake during a rebase of the rebranding change. So the actual number of
XT nodes is a bit higher than counting user-agent strings would suggest.
I sort of neglected XT lately. If we go ahead with this then I'll fix
things like this.
--047d7b5d34fa6788b805173934a5
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blo=
ckquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #c=
cc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div=
class=3D"gmail_quote"><div>And looking at the version (aka user-agent) str=
ings of publicly reachable nodes on the network.</div><div>(e.g. see the co=
unt at =C2=A0<a href=3D"https://getaddr.bitnodes.io/nodes/" target=3D"_blan=
k">https://getaddr.bitnodes.io/nodes/</a> )</div></div></div></div></blockq=
uote><div><br></div><div>Yeah, though FYI Luke informed me last week that I=
somehow managed to take out the change to the user-agent string in Bitcoin=
XT, presumably I made a mistake during a rebase of the rebranding change. =
So the actual number of XT nodes is a bit higher than counting user-agent s=
trings would suggest.</div><div><br></div><div>I sort of neglected XT latel=
y. If we go ahead with this then I'll fix things like this.</div></div>=
</div></div>
--047d7b5d34fa6788b805173934a5--
|
