summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/96/02274fe1b6a0965d9df9da63848ad7118446db
blob: 8ee1c6b39a8b8d425402b62af952fe2ac975608a (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
Return-Path: <edmund.edgar@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F5E2481
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 23 Jul 2015 04:40:31 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ig0-f179.google.com (mail-ig0-f179.google.com
	[209.85.213.179])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9059FE9
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 23 Jul 2015 04:40:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by igr7 with SMTP id 7so84821517igr.0
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed, 22 Jul 2015 21:40:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
	:from:to:content-type;
	bh=G7BaPFf+1r+YIWMWpyCZRl7KW6vsmyDtnlAcFgQFCZA=;
	b=Y1LB0IaAFkHTnLwfAueB5xXkpQuzpxW+JpixUld0WhZwmIaLE0WUayDgesM+MKCirL
	DsHxG9OiSbTDf5UOq3v73jLxCf1UIafA9+h97+vz/IA3ZPwjHDCz+nMcnSH/yLK/ynnh
	FrokAYyOEHoZ8yCyyFmgaqiB89gaBggVfNh75UR88jl4X9IgMCED50Hrh3SOVGPRIXLE
	FdRcmMC3D+2DBXA2MVMyFsG8CGbP1K4EVN67AnQAKuWgRjlLVyXcQbHchdTJZ8EyUAXw
	tl0ntO3HM1+iAZa4wzNFgopMuGSmnTdtqdd5+DzZOVXpPJhamCZ4tmCALBMkxRsgkSDh
	fwfA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.161.206 with SMTP id k197mr9574482ioe.100.1437626430038; 
	Wed, 22 Jul 2015 21:40:30 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: edmund.edgar@gmail.com
Received: by 10.36.66.9 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 21:40:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAPg+sBgugLSVEwDLXhgey86_rM2fTjGWXFuXsiZioJKCZiHiNg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPg+sBgs-ouEMu=LOVCmOyCGwfM1Ygxooz0shyvAuHDGGZYfJw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPg+sBgugLSVEwDLXhgey86_rM2fTjGWXFuXsiZioJKCZiHiNg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 13:40:29 +0900
X-Google-Sender-Auth: jwW7YtYYpfLcdxyGo3iJNFT17Yg
Message-ID: <CA+su7OWvUQWOMGxfWfyyGnJ1=hZeYC6nSXnE_hof-ooFMB4vVg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Edmund Edgar <ed@realitykeys.com>
To: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>,
	bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core and hard forks
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 04:40:31 -0000

> So to point out what I consider obvious: if Bitcoin requires central
> control over its rules by a group of developers, it is completely
> uninteresting to me. Consensus changes should be done using consensus, and
> the default in case of controversy is no change.

This is a really interesting thread. Since we're no longer talking
about a consensus of the core committers, which would be central
control, but instead something broader, could you say a bit more about
what this consensus might look like, and how we'll know if we've got
one?

In plain language "no controversy" sounds like very high bar for a
diverse community like this; Even bringing in P2SH kicked up a fair
bit of fur and feathers. Do you have a definition in mind where it
isn't an _impossibly_ high one?

-- 
Edmund Edgar
Founder, Social Minds Inc (KK)
Twitter: @edmundedgar
Linked In: edmundedgar
Skype: edmundedgar
http://www.socialminds.jp

Reality Keys
@realitykeys
support@realitykeys.com
https://www.realitykeys.com