1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
|
Return-Path: <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 431A4C002D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 12 May 2022 12:20:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C2C760E5B
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 12 May 2022 12:20:12 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org (amavisd-new);
dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=protonmail.com
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id hOFnTq-sXPeP
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 12 May 2022 12:20:11 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from mail-4027.protonmail.ch (mail-4027.protonmail.ch [185.70.40.27])
by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70DA360776
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 12 May 2022 12:20:11 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 12:20:01 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com;
s=protonmail2; t=1652358009; x=1652617209;
bh=EAYQxrcmep2nc7HTsJd+houGBtugtnZkkPUMX60yHqI=;
h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:
References:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:
Feedback-ID:Message-ID;
b=G2X7PrS1p+SOGmK3rhC+FCmUvXDRcnE0/K5uUg1N/RmYD7zQM9vJSSH63WhsPIgW/
MNyzkbW/JwGDuqhi9+ez//d3XiLANf4JZMUzZzyWJEiLrcXWILrICjMSp26R6pA7Cu
2ZWIaM+rxR2fpuDZ2mw82fYByuWFUB75+MQZXP0iAsu0J2wHPMUyr6hUpH5gSpBEqu
dFxa1ItHwFs9Y/evbUmrZetxmyzU6dSeGUlqErxFgDgqIWgC6fH23EfYug+8YyA9vp
0KUsncw6vDBBZWxLQ0m/x18VDQbyOAykrhm8X9mwRgEUFJ1x3pSc/K0VI1vt1OUc3B
JT46kWuGJea0g==
To: =?utf-8?Q?Jorge_Tim=C3=B3n?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
From: ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>
Reply-To: ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>
Message-ID: <YexjEuO_SQawFcFWRGWAoZ0aVZqw6_pem6IGvCrTUGW1Q6WoKFbQXMzf9ICkpxn1ffLGFnvCWv8205dv97pZo9CzfiUA7Q53-X2Sd7uCQEM=@protonmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABm2gDqVcAAz-Nqwt+SPBZrFyTUN3kizSTYkbuWSkoG0xJtoPQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <kbrvpw3Y5y3ko3Wf2VtcywN462JjMW6YjqecduPOXwrek2sR9FkWfSv6G2Fph22UTAAbgII88MtOn1AFo223jjryNAz8YNbbQlFRVQo_HMY=@protonmail.com>
<CABm2gDqxOtrMrTu2Ovx32USJT2T+6DRpexct1-k3zwEEnsDPMA@mail.gmail.com>
<HfqjtQb_3TfhHaAZzYOcUoMic1iG40qUjqlKpzOZY6PSBW1bXVFtFW4zCHFRUdOoIhrard9ZPslzbrIYO0cM-Oi37mLzeEv6MZiQ7JtulE4=@protonmail.com>
<CAGpPWDZVqas6v9nQtGtgk2mMOw9KQ+=dytBc+fBE6SNL=F3bqQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CALeFGL18ULkGW4UA_5Fod4PVoe_LeF5e97eZdJja-ctf2paLWQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAGpPWDYUTCsSgirR7iNmbUw+cjEqHSymtzH4EtH=BQnZRjvgmQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CABm2gDqVcAAz-Nqwt+SPBZrFyTUN3kizSTYkbuWSkoG0xJtoPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Feedback-ID: 2872618:user:proton
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Billy Tetrud <billy.tetrud@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] CTV BIP Meeting #8 Notes
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 12:20:12 -0000
Good morning Jorge,
> I fail to understand why non recursive covenants are called covenants at =
all. Probably I'm missing something, but I guess that's another topic.
A covenant simply promises that something will happen in the future.
A recursive covenant guarantees that the same thing will happen in the futu=
re.
Thus, non-recursive covenants can be useful.
Consider `OP_EVICT`, for example, which is designed for a very specific use=
-case, and avoids recursion.
Regards,
ZmnSCPxj
|
