1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
|
Return-Path: <carlo@spiller.com>
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::133])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B929C0001
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 7 Mar 2021 13:33:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3565E43018
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 7 Mar 2021 13:33:50 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.802
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.802 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id V3SGprdhstqI
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 7 Mar 2021 13:33:49 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: delayed 03:29:59 by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from smtprelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0066.hostedemail.com
[216.40.44.66])
by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6686F43033
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 7 Mar 2021 13:33:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtprelay.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com
[10.5.19.251])
by smtpgrave05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 817BC1801BB9E
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 7 Mar 2021 09:58:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (clb03-v110.bra.tucows.net
[216.40.38.60])
by smtprelay07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 753FF181D2FC1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 7 Mar 2021 09:58:32 +0000 (UTC)
X-Session-Marker: 6361726C6F407370696C6C65722E636F6D
X-Spam-Summary: 10, 1, 0, , d41d8cd98f00b204, carlo@spiller.com, ,
RULES_HIT:41:152:355:379:854:973:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1381:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1541:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:2194:2199:2393:2559:2562:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3353:3865:3866:3867:3868:3870:3871:3872:4250:5007:6670:7903:7996:8957:9010:9108:10004:10400:10848:11658:11914:12050:12297:12660:12663:12760:13069:13071:13311:13357:14096:14097:14180:14685:21060:21080:21627:21795:21809:21888:21939:30051:30054:30056,
0, RBL:none, CacheIP:none, Bayesian:0.5, 0.5, 0.5, Netcheck:none,
DomainCache:0, MSF:not bulk, SPF:, MSBL:0, DNSBL:none, Custom_rules:0:0:0,
LFtime:1, LUA_SUMMARY:none
X-HE-Tag: blood12_1f121cb276e7
X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2134
Received: from Carlos-Mac-Mini.local (bbcs-93-229.pub.wingo.ch [144.2.93.229])
(Authenticated sender: carlo@spiller.com)
by omf09.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 7 Mar 2021 09:58:31 +0000 (UTC)
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
From: Carlo Spiller <carlo@spiller.com>
Message-ID: <5a779c13-8ebf-5052-5bf7-846f970c21ef@spiller.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2021 10:58:30 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.16; rv:78.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 07 Mar 2021 14:37:17 +0000
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Yet another Taproot activation logic
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2021 13:33:50 -0000
Hi everybody
I'm new to this list, but not new to Bitcoin, having skin in the game
since 2014. I was there for the scaling war and the drama around SegWit,
as a simple user. This time, I run my own full node and follow
development. I hope to bring something new to the table.
Having witnessed the miner's unwillingness to activate SegWit truly
makes me concerened for a simple LOT=false. After reading the discussion
now for some time and thinking about it myself, I have come to the
following proposal.
Initially deploy with LOT=false and an activation threshold of 95% of
miner signaling.
*IFF* after 6 months Taproot is not activated by MASF, BUT at least 80%
of hashpower signaled for the upgrade, LOT gets a lock-in date another 6
months later and the threshold for MASF is lowered to 90%.
If after the initial 6 months of signaling with LOT=false, 80% is not
reached, the proposal expires.
This way, a small percent of hashpower does not get to stall activation,
rather, 80% of hashpower can activate LOT=true, and later, 90% can
activate Taproot. If a flaw is found in Taproot in the first six months
(unlikely anyway), miners simply don't signal and the proposal expires.
If miners don't signal at all, only six months are lost, before a new
activation logic can be deployed.
Don't mind this if something similar was already proposed somewhere else.
Best
Carlo
|
