summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/92/525879ebe11ae1a130fcd8b1a8bea09cffb16b
blob: 58af140c9ae75692f8f517daba7b48e4042b1368 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
Return-Path: <eric@voskuil.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDF6A16F4
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sat, 19 Sep 2015 06:56:49 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pa0-f45.google.com (mail-pa0-f45.google.com
	[209.85.220.45])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8555A9C
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sat, 19 Sep 2015 06:56:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pacfv12 with SMTP id fv12so70863662pac.2
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 18 Sep 2015 23:56:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to
	:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type;
	bh=8E+t32QqiZqE769O7sf7EDc0ejeoBguPZtXEcMPm4uQ=;
	b=ZVAQU1qvPaXH58tQSmy5Dyzb21GEnnk1O7DAONM/qZXkD3tZqfv7DdimP4y3yLm2YW
	u7WfojT2U5s8ofwxxdwve3198/sLPmvafJlwLB7d+Ppa7zBlcBWRJXDP3n7pHr3zK1P5
	+xtNg6VaXtEaIHeF84uWCe458ytED8iJ9Suv9Z9BxPtUPQWY0Lu4fQ/CWaGPDCWB/6h1
	q1pGeOidpmVQW2PAoEpC8F+7hPZN8RG1Eqw3Z8sP2MaS7pKOeSJTlYPZsycqG7Hpb5Ko
	9nNe6y9fOTuxfQJEiUMQLKtMqVTG40y9m+PcBHo1QWNtNARE4y/GWE/uqApmX8JZtM52
	9t7A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkLBjrsCr2owbKqruGx77p7OmUUzajOyyzktOP3c3p/LLUSHxJENy+y1H2IonQIeVlSwaT4
X-Received: by 10.68.102.225 with SMTP id fr1mr11705225pbb.65.1442645809227;
	Fri, 18 Sep 2015 23:56:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.13] (c-73-225-134-208.hsd1.wa.comcast.net.
	[73.225.134.208]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id
	be3sm12549305pbc.88.2015.09.18.23.56.48
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
	Fri, 18 Sep 2015 23:56:48 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <55FD0737.1080008@voskuil.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 23:56:55 -0700
From: Eric Voskuil <eric@voskuil.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: NxtChg <nxtchg@hush.com>, Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>, 
	Matt Corallo <lf-lists@mattcorallo.com>
References: <CADm_WcaLKqhR=WcJ5B52Q9SAAa+AdZY6Kz5OCQVUc_RQm6e9gg@mail.gmail.com>	<55F9E47D.50507@mattcorallo.com>	<CAOG=w-t2ZYQbx8+mG5FX8vzgAC_tb8A6KMABmudHQbrquEqX-Q@mail.gmail.com>	<55FC6EBF.9090504@mattcorallo.com>
	<20150919014710.GD22598@muck>
	<20150919060639.A775A404B9@smtp.hushmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150919060639.A775A404B9@smtp.hushmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="uD4CSHb1exaQ08vBEKbUbWfop6d6GHNrM"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin development mailing list <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
	Libbitcoin <libbitcoin@lists.dyne.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Scaling Bitcoin conference micro-report
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 06:56:50 -0000

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--uD4CSHb1exaQ08vBEKbUbWfop6d6GHNrM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 09/18/2015 11:06 PM, NxtChg via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>> While to many of us that sounds crazy, if you're threat model assumes
>> Bitcoin is a legal/regulated service provided by a highly trusted
>> mining community it's a reasonable design.
>
> There is a large, grey area all the way to "legal/regulated service
> provided by a highly trusted mining community". Painting the worst
> looking picture is either a defect in thinking or intentional FUD.

The state is the threat in the Bitcoin threat model. You comments below
acknowledge it. The assumption of hostile state actors is the only
rational starting point. That which is regulated (and regulatable) in
Bitcoin is the attack surface.

While of course there are various degrees of weakness, the reference to
"legal/regulated service provided by a highly trusted mining" as the
threat is by no means irrational or misdirecting. This threat represents
the difference between Bitcoin and Fedcoin.

I found Mike's threat model downright disturbing. All benefits of
Bitcoin arise from its resistance to this threat. Anyone investor in
this space should be paying attention... the apparent benefits of
Bitcoin will vaporize with regulation.

>> Mike Hearn recently posted his threat model, which specifically
>> argues we should assume governments are not a threat.
>
> There are two ways to fight governments:
>
> 1. either you become too big to close, so political repercussions
> become unacceptable

This is extremely naive. At a minimum, getting popular/successful (and
regulated) is the formula for regulatory capture.

> 2. or you become too tiny to hunt, in which case you are much better
> off with a specialized alt-coin, designed specifically for that
> purpose.

I assume you are referring some marginal and largely irrelevant effort.

False dichotomy.

[cross-posted to libbitcoin]


--uD4CSHb1exaQ08vBEKbUbWfop6d6GHNrM
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJV/Qc3AAoJEDzYwH8LXOFODmMH/isas58lMn7aMKNvIHB9c/uy
ewhO9BpzaTQRARWixhUdCoa32ZYkYu4u65U3D3YnavLeg+OLu5Hq445OISA/lkEB
fCn0KpOm36AA2F4bQR2Q+gprvGoq7aD10gVuLwLvNGw1dW6t1OWaz53NkJOChphb
NNlqCBk6ktiCM9brNZJxihDE043dWJ0joKmSuSEV6jIzBG2LWzPp/1IrFISP56GA
4bzQGaqy+4OEO//UlS8NHsZ7DZMeRdfBW4KNFPOoAKdywShRwh6jPV0EaSGp0xjG
QpjN9pRMJjqhkbE1PkfJBrjrPu6KbF6wgMDpK7NyvTBQqf827O5i9flUdyVv1Oo=
=w/pD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--uD4CSHb1exaQ08vBEKbUbWfop6d6GHNrM--