1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <drak@zikula.org>) id 1WJTrx-0005sR-0I
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Fri, 28 Feb 2014 20:17:17 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of zikula.org
designates 74.125.82.173 as permitted sender)
client-ip=74.125.82.173; envelope-from=drak@zikula.org;
helo=mail-we0-f173.google.com;
Received: from mail-we0-f173.google.com ([74.125.82.173])
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1WJTru-0003uF-VP
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Fri, 28 Feb 2014 20:17:16 +0000
Received: by mail-we0-f173.google.com with SMTP id w61so963385wes.4
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Fri, 28 Feb 2014 12:17:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
bh=stw2JvKdloLs16Mv9I+eVQRVz5CenroXq69cYSGKIqQ=;
b=L+XZmXp3wL5dhfi0RKW8fnwzT7OQTvFnNVomIL8aa8VxcZh8e5f4zZAUjqY/bkkruU
G0D7h5OAayHeO218WatMXS9yG30qjSfAGtlu/v69UzwMVoyCbZJFo0apYUTvem5sRm86
tlJfm4oESdaF8BqduZ0Dcfd/WEOOE7CSuJ9nOww5mgXoWdqKvGQZ9eskCRit3oZ4zGc0
Knq6P1Wu1IFQdLBXsL0yo9ChFq0uuSS493c8CugATADZUY5qr1t1+9Xu5Rnh3ZcPBAP3
CEDWxYWvvp85jsilTcAHaTkIxcga/NlXZXrT4fJUJAv3isNDwKeVA/16OBymEmQ5RQ1b
q3FA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmFne95Q63LLIYqh5ddaSnLWtLbbBFEpVntUNYpWdphLXdDRfAJeMuwgGZhZDlEuYZ29by7
X-Received: by 10.194.204.229 with SMTP id lb5mr4148022wjc.67.1393618252500;
Fri, 28 Feb 2014 12:10:52 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.194.205.69 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 12:10:32 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAEz79Po37XkoQ=+kQOTdagVn-vYuqYwotQf58YcgTndaaAmXNw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJHLa0PXHY1qisXhN98DMxgp11ouqkzYMBvrTTNOtwX09T1kZg@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+s+GJC1FgCW9spkViMPvuWNS84Ys33pj=RP1ZpzBCa++e-iMQ@mail.gmail.com>
<530B8000.1070801@monetize.io> <20140228052523.GO3180@nl.grid.coop>
<CAEz79Po37XkoQ=+kQOTdagVn-vYuqYwotQf58YcgTndaaAmXNw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Drak <drak@zikula.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 20:10:32 +0000
Message-ID: <CANAnSg346s0FqhP+57f1TdnCj3=MVht--qGTCpO+BxOpHA=9Uw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Warren Togami Jr." <wtogami@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bae4664e4a5e204f37d08a4
X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
X-Headers-End: 1WJTru-0003uF-VP
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] On OP_RETURN in upcoming 0.9 release
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 20:17:17 -0000
--047d7bae4664e4a5e204f37d08a4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On 28 February 2014 14:42, Warren Togami Jr. <wtogami@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> https://github.com/litecoin-project/litecoin/commit/db4d8e21d99551bef4c807aa1534a074e4b7964d
>
> In one way in particular, the transaction fees per kilobyte completely
> failed to account for the actual cost to the network. If Bitcoin had
> adopted a common-sense rule like this, I would have had no reason to join
> Litecoin development last year. This is one of the few economic design
> flaws that Satoshi overlooked in the original design.
>
Is there any particular reason that patch would not make it into bitcoin if
submitted?
Drak
--047d7bae4664e4a5e204f37d08a4
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On 2=
8 February 2014 14:42, Warren Togami Jr. <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"m=
ailto:wtogami@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">wtogami@gmail.com</a>></span>=
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D""><div><a hre=
f=3D"https://github.com/litecoin-project/litecoin/commit/db4d8e21d99551bef4=
c807aa1534a074e4b7964d" target=3D"_blank">https://github.com/litecoin-proje=
ct/litecoin/commit/db4d8e21d99551bef4c807aa1534a074e4b7964d</a><br>
</div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">
<div><br></div><div>In one way in particular, the transaction fees per kilo=
byte completely failed to account for the actual cost to the network. =C2=
=A0If Bitcoin had adopted a common-sense rule like this, I would have had n=
o reason to join Litecoin development last year. =C2=A0This is one of the f=
ew economic design flaws that Satoshi overlooked in the original design.</d=
iv>
</div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Is there any particular =
reason that patch would not make it into bitcoin if submitted?</div><div><b=
r>Drak=C2=A0</div></div></div></div>
--047d7bae4664e4a5e204f37d08a4--
|
