summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/90/0bf87e46fb8a72e9427a25e65d15b6554bbd6a
blob: a8bcaf50bf5698632b077c978021079de0782456 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <laanwj@gmail.com>) id 1WLTAU-0004gF-CF
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 06 Mar 2014 07:56:38 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.214.46 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.214.46; envelope-from=laanwj@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-bk0-f46.google.com; 
Received: from mail-bk0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46])
	by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1WLTAT-0001VW-GE
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 06 Mar 2014 07:56:38 +0000
Received: by mail-bk0-f46.google.com with SMTP id v15so548508bkz.5
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Wed, 05 Mar 2014 23:56:31 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.204.73.2 with SMTP id o2mr39971bkj.55.1394092591069; Wed, 05
	Mar 2014 23:56:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.205.75.72 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 23:56:30 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <5317A292.2030102@gmail.com>
References: <5317A292.2030102@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 08:56:30 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+s+GJA7V1hGRxYr0f7a8hPEnY-+AqeTPZVQ6WzOLCo-n6ayLg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Wladimir <laanwj@gmail.com>
To: Kevin <kevinsisco61784@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b874e4cace2ce04f3eb795a
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(laanwj[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1WLTAT-0001VW-GE
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Process for getting a patch aproved?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 07:56:38 -0000

--047d7b874e4cace2ce04f3eb795a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 11:17 PM, Kevin <kevinsisco61784@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello.  How would I submit a patch?  Could it be sent through the list
> as an attachment?
>

You can, but as reviewing can take a while, the github model works better
for this project.

In my experience people lose track of patches sent to mailing lists, at
least when posted to github there will be a nagging 'issue' appearing until
it is either merged or closed otherwise.

If it concerns a proposed protocol change do discuss it on the mailing
list, as people building other implementations read here and not on github.

Wladimir

--047d7b874e4cace2ce04f3eb795a
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">=
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 11:17 PM, Kevin <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mai=
lto:kevinsisco61784@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">kevinsisco61784@gmail.com<=
/a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hello. =C2=A0How would I submit a patch? =C2=
=A0Could it be sent through the list<br>
as an attachment?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>You can, but as revie=
wing can take a while, the github model works better for this project.</div=
><div><br></div><div>In my experience people lose track of patches sent to =
mailing lists, at least when posted to github there will be a nagging &#39;=
issue&#39; appearing until it is either merged or closed otherwise.</div>
<div><br></div><div>If it concerns a proposed protocol change do discuss it=
 on the mailing list, as people building other implementations read here an=
d not on github.</div><div><br></div><div>Wladimir<br></div><div><br></div>
</div></div></div>

--047d7b874e4cace2ce04f3eb795a--