summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/8e/782fbf116d96e73aa7f918c00e5686933c1bad
blob: fb95d77b4336e1d81130009a66ffc885b170505b (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
Return-Path: <jeanpaulkogelman@me.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 834E5475
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:23:00 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from st11p02im-asmtp001.me.com (st11p02im-asmtp001.me.com
	[17.172.220.113])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B12E11BF
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:22:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.52.6.2] (unknown [101.78.135.131])
	by st11p02im-asmtp001.me.com
	(Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.35.0 64bit (built Mar 31
	2015))
	with ESMTPSA id <0NRY01A6AUE7AK30@st11p02im-asmtp001.me.com> for
	bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org;
	Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:22:58 +0000 (GMT)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure
	engine=2.50.10432:5.14.151,1.0.33,0.0.0000
	definitions=2015-07-24_01:2015-07-22, 2015-07-23,
	1970-01-01 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0
	suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam
	adjust=0
	reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1412110000
	definitions=main-1507230316
Sun-Java-System-SMTP-Warning: Lines longer than SMTP allows found and wrapped.
Content-type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary=Apple-Mail-9D7A1662-194B-4B9A-BD30-8E49B7424FDB
MIME-version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Jean-Paul Kogelman <jeanpaulkogelman@me.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12H143)
In-reply-to: <D472C05D-7164-4ED1-B571-94415AD8E60F@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 08:22:53 +0800
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Message-id: <346D4CE0-E00D-4ABB-B131-EFA1416CB20C@me.com>
References: <CAPg+sBgs-ouEMu=LOVCmOyCGwfM1Ygxooz0shyvAuHDGGZYfJw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPg+sBgugLSVEwDLXhgey86_rM2fTjGWXFuXsiZioJKCZiHiNg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADm_WcbnQQGZoQ92twfUvbzqGwu__xLn+BYOkHPZY_YT1pFrbA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPWm=eW8RgrG1CMEAMN4GeiMjZecFvNtZB_Y4rZNeofWSD0=Wg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADm_WcYCUHs9Qe_T6WJOCUSK6stXYD8v6z5JcGHfRMURoOSFTA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABm2gDq3JyZx0QCRDbcNSLSOBKdpi4h_7VN1XL8N42U38+eBAA@mail.gmail.com>
	<55B113AF.40500@thinlink.com>
	<CABsx9T1MTc-GmuQyFN1vaFK=CDWV_L214Pi9nR6jLMouQQD0fw@mail.gmail.com>
	<C5A70F53-4779-457A-A06A-686877706F89@gmail.com>
	<CADL_X_exckh5T2BfzPEp26fPR3TD69QarwroDEdS_9wtnKbf+g@mail.gmail.com>
	<6F436293-9E2B-461C-B105-FC4CF9EBFC69@gmail.com>
	<CADL_X_fs3-Zj-9nHu5HXCS=kNFUTJkrUR_8SL+d+M4ziwB66Jw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABm2gDqFe+_g5Mk=tXCD94x74pu6SiL+XHhMM-T3bBw78m3Mow@mail.gmail.com>
	<D161F6BB-BFB1-4B9F-B024-D60A170F393C@gmail.com>
	<CALqmWPC8PdSPS3chhnjBaTixrvvg0VrEaXzd3OvbXifkMs0DUw@mail.gmail.com>
	<42BF7FEB-320F-43BE-B3D9-1D76CB8B9975@gmai> <l.com@mac.com>
	<D472C05D-7164-4ED1-B571-94415AD8E60F@gmail.com>
To: Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo@gmail.com>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
	MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: "bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org"
	<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core and hard forks
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:23:00 -0000


--Apple-Mail-9D7A1662-194B-4B9A-BD30-8E49B7424FDB
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=gb2312
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

You are not going to get a fair fee market if your only form of enforcement i=
s the threat of exclusion.

A more fair fee market will develop if miners start offering quality of serv=
ice, preferably at multiple tiers. At that point any interference from a blo=
ck size cap will only be detrimental. In fact it will only highlight what th=
e cap is actually for; to prevent monster blocks.=20

Add better QoS tools for miners and extend the cap (when possible) and there=
's your fee market.

jp


> On Jul 24, 2015, at 8:04 AM, Eric Lombrozo via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@li=
sts.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>=20
> I should also add that I think those who claim that fee pressure will scar=
e away users and break the industry are *seriously* underestimating human in=
genuity in the face of a challenge. We can do this - we can overcome this ob=
stacle=A1=ADwe can find good solutions to a fee market. Unless someone can c=
ome up with another way to pay for the operation of the network, we NEED to d=
o this. What makes anyone think it will be easier to do later rather than no=
w? The longer we wait, the lower block rewards get, the larger the deployed i=
nfrastructure, the larger our userbase, the HARDER it will be to solve it. W=
e should solve it now - we will be much better off for it=A1=ADand so will o=
ur users.
>=20
>=20
>>> On Jul 23, 2015, at 4:57 PM, Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> On Jul 23, 2015, at 4:42 PM, Benedict Chan <bencxr@fragnetics.com> wrote=
:
>>>=20
>>> Scaling the network will come in the form of a combination of many
>>> optimizations. Just because we do not know for sure how to eventually
>>> serve 7 billion people does not mean we should make decisions on
>>> global validation that impact our ability to serve the current set of
>>> users.
>>=20
>> Agreed. But I believe the economic and security arguments I gave regardin=
g fees and incentives still hold and are largely separate from the scalabili=
ty issue. Please correct me if I overlooked something.
>>=20
>>=20
>>> Also, blocking a change because it's "more important to address issues
>>> such as..." other improvements will further slow down the discussion.
>>> I believe an increase will not prevent the development of other
>>> improvements that we need - in contrast, the sooner we can get over
>>> the limit (which, as you agree, needs to be changed at some point),
>>> the sooner we can get back to work.
>>=20
>> An increase in block size at this time will exacerbate security concerns a=
round nodes relying on other nodes to validate (particularly miners and wall=
ets). It=A1=AFs not really a matter of having limited developer resources th=
at need to be budgeted, as you seem to suggest.
>>=20
>> Regarding developments on properly handling fees, there must exist the ec=
onomic need for it before there=A1=AFs an earnest effort to solve it. Increa=
sing the block size right now will, in all likelihood, delay this effort. I=A1=
=AFd much prefer to first let the fee market evolve because it=A1=AFs a cruc=
ial component to the protocol=A1=AFs design and its security model=A1=ADand s=
o we can get a better sense for fee economics. Then we might be able to figu=
re out better approaches to block size changes in the future that makes sens=
e economically=A1=ADperhaps with mechanisms that can dynamically adjust it t=
o reflect resource availability and network load.
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev

--Apple-Mail-9D7A1662-194B-4B9A-BD30-8E49B7424FDB
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html><head><meta http-equiv=3D"content-type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3D=
utf-8"></head><body dir=3D"auto"><div>You are not going to get a fair fee ma=
rket if your only form of enforcement is the threat of exclusion.<br><br>A m=
ore fair fee market will develop if miners start offering quality of service=
, preferably at multiple tiers. At that point any interference from a block s=
ize cap will only be detrimental. In fact it will only highlight what the ca=
p is actually for; to prevent monster blocks.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div=
>Add better QoS tools for miners and extend the cap (when possible) and ther=
e's your fee market.</div><div><br></div><div>jp<br><br></div><div><br>On Ju=
l 24, 2015, at 8:04 AM, Eric Lombrozo via bitcoin-dev &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:=
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org=
</a>&gt; wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type=3D"cite"><div><meta http-equiv=
=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html charset=3Dutf-8">I should also add th=
at I think those who claim that fee pressure will scare away users and break=
 the industry are *seriously* underestimating human ingenuity in the face of=
 a challenge. We can do this - we can overcome this obstacle=E2=80=A6we can f=
ind good solutions to a fee market. Unless someone can come up with another w=
ay to pay for the operation of the network, we NEED to do this. What makes a=
nyone think it will be easier to do later rather than now? The longer we wai=
t, the lower block rewards get, the larger the deployed infrastructure, the l=
arger our userbase, the HARDER it will be to solve it. We should solve it no=
w - we will be much better off for it=E2=80=A6and so will our users.<div cla=
ss=3D""><br class=3D""></div><div class=3D""><br class=3D""><div><blockquote=
 type=3D"cite" class=3D""><div class=3D"">On Jul 23, 2015, at 4:57 PM, Eric L=
ombrozo &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:elombrozo@gmail.com" class=3D"">elombrozo@gmai=
l.com</a>&gt; wrote:</div><br class=3D"Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=
=3D""><meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html charset=3Dutf-8=
" class=3D""><div style=3D"word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -=
webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=3D""><br class=3D""><div class=3D=
""><blockquote type=3D"cite" class=3D""><div class=3D"">On Jul 23, 2015, at 4=
:42 PM, Benedict Chan &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bencxr@fragnetics.com" class=3D"=
">bencxr@fragnetics.com</a>&gt; wrote:</div><br class=3D"Apple-interchange-n=
ewline"><div class=3D""><span style=3D"font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12=
px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-sp=
acing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-i=
ndent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-sp=
acing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; float: none; display: inline !im=
portant;" class=3D"">Scaling the network will come in the form of a combinat=
ion of many</span><br style=3D"font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font=
-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: n=
ormal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0=
px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0=
px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;" class=3D""><span style=3D"font-family: H=
elvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-we=
ight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; te=
xt-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal=
; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; float: no=
ne; display: inline !important;" class=3D"">optimizations. Just because we d=
o not know for sure how to eventually</span><br style=3D"font-family: Helvet=
ica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight:=
 normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-al=
ign: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; wid=
ows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;" class=3D""><s=
pan style=3D"font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; fo=
nt-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height=
: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform=
: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-s=
troke-width: 0px; float: none; display: inline !important;" class=3D"">serve=
 7 billion people does not mean we should make decisions on</span><br style=3D=
"font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: n=
ormal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orp=
hans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white=
-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0=
px;" class=3D""><span style=3D"font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font=
-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: n=
ormal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0=
px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0=
px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; float: none; display: inline !important;=
" class=3D"">global validation that impact our ability to serve the current s=
et of</span><br style=3D"font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style=
: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal;=
 line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; te=
xt-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -w=
ebkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;" class=3D""><span style=3D"font-family: Helvet=
ica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight:=
 normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-al=
ign: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; wid=
ows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; float: none; d=
isplay: inline !important;" class=3D"">users.</span><br style=3D"font-family=
: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font=
-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto;=
 text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: nor=
mal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;" class=
=3D""></div></blockquote><div class=3D""><br class=3D""></div>Agreed. But I b=
elieve the economic and security arguments I gave regarding fees and incenti=
ves still hold and are largely separate from the scalability issue. Please c=
orrect me if I overlooked something.</div><div class=3D""><div class=3D""><b=
r class=3D""></div><br class=3D""><blockquote type=3D"cite" class=3D""><div c=
lass=3D""><span style=3D"font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style=
: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal;=
 line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; te=
xt-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -w=
ebkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; float: none; display: inline !important;" clas=
s=3D"">Also, blocking a change because it's "more important to address issue=
s</span><br style=3D"font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: no=
rmal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; lin=
e-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-t=
ransform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webki=
t-text-stroke-width: 0px;" class=3D""><span style=3D"font-family: Helvetica;=
 font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: nor=
mal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align:=
 start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows:=
 auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; float: none; displ=
ay: inline !important;" class=3D"">such as..." other improvements will furth=
er slow down the discussion.</span><br style=3D"font-family: Helvetica; font=
-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; l=
etter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start=
; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto;=
 word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;" class=3D""><span style=3D=
"font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: n=
ormal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orp=
hans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white=
-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0=
px; float: none; display: inline !important;" class=3D"">I believe an increa=
se will not prevent the development of other</span><br style=3D"font-family:=
 Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-=
weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; t=
ext-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: norma=
l; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;" class=3D=
""><span style=3D"font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: norma=
l; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-h=
eight: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-tran=
sform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-t=
ext-stroke-width: 0px; float: none; display: inline !important;" class=3D"">=
improvements that we need - in contrast, the sooner we can get over</span><b=
r style=3D"font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font=
-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: n=
ormal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: n=
one; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stro=
ke-width: 0px;" class=3D""><span style=3D"font-family: Helvetica; font-size:=
 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter=
-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; tex=
t-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word=
-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; float: none; display: inline !=
important;" class=3D"">the limit (which, as you agree, needs to be changed a=
t some point),</span><br style=3D"font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; f=
ont-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing=
: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent=
: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing=
: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;" class=3D""><span style=3D"font-famil=
y: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; fon=
t-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto=
; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: no=
rmal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; float=
: none; display: inline !important;" class=3D"">the sooner we can get back t=
o work.</span><br style=3D"font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-sty=
le: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: norma=
l; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; t=
ext-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -=
webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;" class=3D""></div></blockquote></div><br clas=
s=3D""><div class=3D"">An increase in block size at this time will exacerbat=
e security concerns around nodes relying on other nodes to validate (particu=
larly miners and wallets). It=E2=80=99s not really a matter of having limite=
d developer resources that need to be budgeted, as you seem to suggest.</div=
><div class=3D""><br class=3D""></div><div class=3D"">Regarding developments=
 on properly handling fees, there must exist the economic need for it before=
 there=E2=80=99s an earnest effort to solve it. Increasing the block size ri=
ght now will, in all likelihood, delay this effort. I=E2=80=99d much prefer t=
o first let the fee market evolve because it=E2=80=99s a crucial component t=
o the protocol=E2=80=99s design and its security model=E2=80=A6and so we can=
 get a better sense for fee economics. Then we might be able to figure out b=
etter approaches to block size changes in the future that makes sense econom=
ically=E2=80=A6perhaps with mechanisms that can dynamically adjust it to ref=
lect resource availability and network load.</div></div></div></blockquote><=
/div><br class=3D""></div></div></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite"><div>=
<span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>bitcoi=
n-dev mailing list</span><br><span><a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linux=
foundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a></span><br><span><a=
 href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev">htt=
ps://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a></span><br></=
div></blockquote></body></html>=

--Apple-Mail-9D7A1662-194B-4B9A-BD30-8E49B7424FDB--