1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
|
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <jgarzik@bitpay.com>) id 1WzSxi-0008GT-5l
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:48:46 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of bitpay.com
designates 74.125.82.43 as permitted sender)
client-ip=74.125.82.43; envelope-from=jgarzik@bitpay.com;
helo=mail-wg0-f43.google.com;
Received: from mail-wg0-f43.google.com ([74.125.82.43])
by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1WzSxf-0005E8-VG
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:48:46 +0000
Received: by mail-wg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id b13so575423wgh.14
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Tue, 24 Jun 2014 08:48:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=L/z6BY+EyxpTxLBJX4jCl6xS44H6rDdyG0tC/WgOjKA=;
b=gLzTVXOzZceiJLlvZw9M6pzYIjRQjWsc6n9PG0LD1C2JUFE6jbmcLlYBRzb+qUiaHU
loZAwDN8k+WhBKJPakpvaHsrG6A5h40euvwsVLqKT9qm14Rmn3yjN2wk+gXb3/AW0t3B
Oseq2lI43sfBm9vFhAyrXqLswAhQVX8Dqlf5EJ3L7Iw3h2pDS3iR87HvM+syKb+V2XTF
LJKrzr0xMk8r8M132zGDpr1ttvkfTMrVEAf6MLhTNVXiYXt7khRrJIB8mFGErBennoL9
+Zkkb4IPKMqFNKh4JoqRulhF7MbjeghbWEDSEJprAQ37So2OxOHD8jWtRu3zwb0Mhe3t
KeIw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnWyEMSed15L9dnsnQgtC47+D6cEu1Byn+EFt8RYx9IjNQ00E0gJ23QTh7qUHNGcrJtGeKb
X-Received: by 10.180.92.138 with SMTP id cm10mr1423367wib.36.1403624915951;
Tue, 24 Jun 2014 08:48:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.195.12.3 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 08:48:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <6E6F88E9-5698-419B-927C-F65A5FCABBE9@gmail.com>
References: <CANEZrP3iyQ9zQ+hDnooxrjdBO+_Fj+nAkK1Skgk+Gb4gkidPhQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAJHLa0Omiz+UhGjSKgYU7+b2YY7aN23w7o8CQntqMePFs7LkjA@mail.gmail.com>
<CANEZrP06gk-JhKaNpvYUTfjFq9AGnCay9=pjUGpVMjMSuX3_ew@mail.gmail.com>
<CAJna-HhX8HOci0KMe4ZScr4QW792S3n5twvU0QhbQe1N_3q7_w@mail.gmail.com>
<6E6F88E9-5698-419B-927C-F65A5FCABBE9@gmail.com>
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@bitpay.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 11:48:15 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJHLa0PYfuJg3daPvzPFZpFz7ezH2RHpJ8zyz2g1NDKppM7rWA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gmail <will.yager@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1WzSxf-0005E8-VG
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed BIP 70 extension
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:48:46 -0000
I think there is nothing wrong with having a numeric memo field, which
is effectively what this is. Structured rather than unstructured
data.
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Gmail <will.yager@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> On Jun 24, 2014, at 10:32, slush <slush@centrum.cz> wrote:
>>
>> Sounds like marketing bullshit to me. It does not have even statistical =
meaning; well, you can "save" a lot of satoshis, but nobody tell you that t=
he merchant cut you on BTC/USD exchange rate in tens of %.
>
> People would also abuse this feature in the same way amazon (and other sa=
les sites) abuse the definition of "save". For example, Amazon will indicat=
e that you're getting x% off by shopping at amazon, but all that number rea=
lly means is x% off MSRP. In reality, every website has the same price. I h=
ave no doubt that merchants would put similarly meaningless and/or misleadi=
ng data in this field.
>
> I agree, the memo field is appropriate for this data.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----
> Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse
> Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Editi=
on
> Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows
> Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
--=20
Jeff Garzik
Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist
BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/
|
