summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/87/17818c2a4f4b8dde6e73c4ec85815bc1a5c857
blob: f367da7e75afda01079a8041632f2021421f555e (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <jim@ergophobia.org>) id 1YrA4j-0005oK-QQ
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sat, 09 May 2015 19:06:13 +0000
X-ACL-Warn: 
Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49])
	by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1YrA4i-0007NX-Hs
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sat, 09 May 2015 19:06:13 +0000
Received: by wgyo15 with SMTP id o15so97542304wgy.2
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Sat, 09 May 2015 12:06:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
	bh=WVAdmXCryZ24DKHZsZo997FNnHbVTu5526dK4l/410c=;
	b=j8FRP4+BSeDDQ29htg3AdiDyKQBPpM1Wkfk23KXEV+aRJQ0LtJbU6oKKiz74TXRYtx
	drTTPV2YXVh6XL+RQ24Ujc4qNdDha2pMntV/Uwpzt2uxWbVI+UqUyQRZIT8E26crEZ5Y
	+CHIICXuZLFyCLUYM4dxg+LX3otHvKhoOoAUgQbwtnhZIlNWM6cuHrFzsHhjoi/Tmkan
	KYBgHM/3GaULvtI+q0SQ7k7gPFJsORz2NPn0v7f9YUAeup33YLl++mbgKGEmYHfU9a0W
	fMxQVfOlyIv1g4u2T9L5Enc6H+QlcW3ClH9HwfO9aXDpTg0s5Kr78emYQYu5vVF0rm5S
	pIZg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnzeORTGXnSxh1hdBFuI8DU/EYfUfga5POcog0OYq8v1ElOR1SMCgSUabsc+2fun/s+QqWL
X-Received: by 10.180.74.208 with SMTP id w16mr6660651wiv.31.1431198366521;
	Sat, 09 May 2015 12:06:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.194.246.69 with HTTP; Sat, 9 May 2015 12:05:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <millgi$3uv$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <CANe1mWzBy8-C+CWfwaOLxJ2wokjy8ytQUh2TkRY_Ummn1BpPzw@mail.gmail.com>
	<millgi$3uv$1@ger.gmane.org>
From: Jim Phillips <jim@ergophobia.org>
Date: Sat, 9 May 2015 14:05:36 -0500
Message-ID: <CANe1mWzEypArb_qjvYFJqk-4hQGH+03et8Zot=ZJYT9pYjrgTA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andreas Schildbach <andreas@schildbach.de>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043892173d6fed0515aad64a
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
X-Headers-End: 1YrA4i-0007NX-Hs
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] A suggestion for reducing the size of the
 UTXO database
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 May 2015 19:06:13 -0000

--f46d043892173d6fed0515aad64a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Andreas Schildbach <andreas@schildbach.de>
wrote:

> Actually your assumption is wrong. Bitcoin Wallet (and I think most, if
> not all, other bitcoinj based wallets) picks UTXO by age, in order to
> maximize priority. So it keeps the number of UTXOs low, though not as
> low as if it would always pick *all* UTXOs.
>
> Is it not fair to say though that UTXO database growth is not considered
when selecting the UTXOs to use? And that size of transaction is a priority
if not the top priority?

--f46d043892173d6fed0515aad64a
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On S=
at, May 9, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Andreas Schildbach <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a hre=
f=3D"mailto:andreas@schildbach.de" target=3D"_blank">andreas@schildbach.de<=
/a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:=
0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Actually your assum=
ption is wrong. Bitcoin Wallet (and I think most, if<br>
not all, other bitcoinj based wallets) picks UTXO by age, in order to<br>
maximize priority. So it keeps the number of UTXOs low, though not as<br>
low as if it would always pick *all* UTXOs.<br>
<div><div class=3D"h5"><br></div></div></blockquote><div>Is it not fair to =
say though that UTXO database growth is not considered when selecting the U=
TXOs to use? And that size of transaction is a priority if not the top prio=
rity?=C2=A0</div></div></div></div>

--f46d043892173d6fed0515aad64a--