1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
|
Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 847DE3EE
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 26 Nov 2015 22:26:05 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from outmail149101.authsmtp.com (outmail149101.authsmtp.com
[62.13.149.101])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC2A7115
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 26 Nov 2015 22:26:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-c232.authsmtp.com (mail-c232.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.232])
by punt21.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id tAQMQ1Gd055165;
Thu, 26 Nov 2015 22:26:01 GMT
Received: from savin.petertodd.org (75-119-251-161.dsl.teksavvy.com
[75.119.251.161]) (authenticated bits=128)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id tAQMPvXp020653
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
Thu, 26 Nov 2015 22:25:59 GMT
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 17:25:56 -0500
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20151126222556.GC6550@savin.petertodd.org>
References: <em80f319b9-ff7c-4a88-85c7-efdb0333ada1@platinum>
<523E7E80-A958-4333-96FB-1E0D36BB128F@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7qSK/uQB79J36Y4o"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <523E7E80-A958-4333-96FB-1E0D36BB128F@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Server-Quench: abd4b1d8-948c-11e5-829e-00151795d556
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
bgdMdAQUFloCAgsB AmMbWVZeUlt7WWM7 bA9PbARUfEhLXhtr
VklWR1pVCwQmRW1g e35YOllydQVAfX0+ bEBmWj4KDhB+J0cp
SlNdEWVVeGZhPWUC WEJRIh5UcAJPfxhM bwR6UXVDAzANdhEy
HhM4ODE3eDlSNhEd awURIEgUSFoKADN0 QRkHEH0hGldNbAUe
BD8dB2chMWA6H3sf C3oPaBpYGT4qU1QE XikA
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1037:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 75.119.251.161/587
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Alternative name for CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY (BIP112)
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 22:26:05 -0000
--7qSK/uQB79J36Y4o
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 01:32:58PM -0800, Eric Lombrozo via bitcoin-dev wro=
te:
> After a little more though (and some comments from aj), I realize that th=
e opcode naming convention is actually CHECK <condition > VERIFY.
>=20
> Therefore, the full opcode name should be CHECKRELATIVELOCKTIMEVERIFY.
>=20
> However, this name is ridiculously long, so at least some part will requi=
re abbreviation.
>=20
> In typical script example usage, most sensible seems to be to abbreviate =
both CLTV and CRLTV.
=2E..and CRLTV is hard to visually distinguish from CLTV. :(
You know, calling it AGEVERIFY is short and sweet.
--=20
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
00000000000000000ef246c814f8cb8c1a26bc3c6cb1286bdbc5f4140ed3fc79
--7qSK/uQB79J36Y4o
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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==
=d6Dh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--7qSK/uQB79J36Y4o--
|
