1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
|
Return-Path: <sergio.d.lerner@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D732722
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 11 May 2016 12:21:36 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-io0-f172.google.com (mail-io0-f172.google.com
[209.85.223.172])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBE34167
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 11 May 2016 12:21:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-io0-f172.google.com with SMTP id i75so46189606ioa.3
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 11 May 2016 05:21:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=KB3HTpYvbtyud+qj0+bbYrOlvx9GUmya9/6dGoDAKW8=;
b=DKraHCaMA2cwzQHlAl5kr8dEZ6MjPDVsgRpsAC2M7aQZ03zxSnK21gAfMGHbDla/iz
VAr0/iWt+BSuq+zEDekMzx+54ybrBTWuInOPCHwf+nbMUg/LRKJA9vX17CPGo1Uz3pLs
p9GOmB/zUCp1aGWQzKwDrkKw6isXS44gLEQwJZNar8B/XwlR9u2PkH1cglevDDrqVk+X
XMhLQBH+E0vZdmgcDswygZxVZjHzXgxgdHTXLhVF5hmC/P5yy20hzmhgFrPQS5tK6iOF
V8mE277HI5FmT6459FIyjJp3yaakE0PHg/vawoNL/4dTPKIRZDSax8dx6t/Xg2LADEZd
gbWw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to;
bh=KB3HTpYvbtyud+qj0+bbYrOlvx9GUmya9/6dGoDAKW8=;
b=PKkWvj+d5NUH0keJ67uMCR7HMTFuIJ1gNUZ0gccY2Amc0Pt4Iv1MauyhpShX7k/QFi
sLDb+sXy3tWMYE7pSVZuEUa7JXEMpPn7itJxOJi+aZuQp0Sv7I3lXoeCslHeQYa0CBsW
dZHD5hFBjbsGnfwXc018/HQjsxjy+uQQYLntJtFZvvabf9kyYIGfx6ikKv6vHxPkZ6Ft
tUimyK0BOb/WSBMIL7Wv1FUUF7hLxLYwow5u8QMcP7Ismntpe1C8luU6zo5llntrDzVB
LuAP6Ao5xC6RmTlCrDGHCWbau1XBBR9p9a3SG132gKJ1ZjiL403wfHEcGMLhj+W2KNVm
lEAA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWmo/nbubGc+jhvi6kh9C7P97UXaRb51ETGK2luCSgBNorbvrlCGV6DNPPeJPXF5FwlqaUh3QrS8xs2gQ==
X-Received: by 10.36.73.164 with SMTP id e36mr1821130itd.80.1462969295323;
Wed, 11 May 2016 05:21:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.142.69 with HTTP; Wed, 11 May 2016 05:20:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAKzdR-ou2FYjjxmRBLARhvfhHO-46weiMc2Q2f+GZf1E_JUEAg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20160510185728.GA1149@fedora-21-dvm>
<CAE-z3OWvLqONwaN+608jBn9=q1yUvU4ggGrMpA8rE6qmjDQHtg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAKzdR-ou2FYjjxmRBLARhvfhHO-46weiMc2Q2f+GZf1E_JUEAg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Sergio Demian Lerner <sergio.d.lerner@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 09:20:55 -0300
Message-ID: <CAKzdR-pFZGsQZPrHRbJhviFemSLPf8Bo6UWSaaQ-BurCsnAAWw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tier Nolan <tier.nolan@gmail.com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11447d762a4cbe053290151f
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Making AsicBoost irrelevant
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 12:21:36 -0000
--001a11447d762a4cbe053290151f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 6:43 PM, Sergio Demian Lerner <
sergio.d.lerner@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> You can find it here:
> https://bitslog.wordpress.com/2014/03/18/the-re-design-of-the-bitcoin-block-header/
>
> Basically, the idea is to put in the first 64 bytes a 4 byte hash of the
> second 64-byte chunk. That design also allows increased nonce space in the
> first 64 bytes.
>
> My mistake here. I didn't recalled correctly my own idea. The idea is to
include in the second 64-byte chunk a 4-byte hash of the first chunk, not
the opposite.
--001a11447d762a4cbe053290151f
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quo=
te">On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 6:43 PM, Sergio Demian Lerner <span dir=3D"ltr"=
><<a href=3D"mailto:sergio.d.lerner@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">sergio.=
d.lerner@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quot=
e" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">=
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div><div><div><br><div><br></div>You can find it her=
e: <a href=3D"https://bitslog.wordpress.com/2014/03/18/the-re-design-of-the=
-bitcoin-block-header/" target=3D"_blank">https://bitslog.wordpress.com/201=
4/03/18/the-re-design-of-the-bitcoin-block-header/</a><br></div><div><br></=
div>Basically, the idea is to put in the first 64 bytes a 4 byte hash of th=
e second 64-byte chunk. That design also allows increased nonce space in th=
e first 64 bytes. <br><br></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div>My mist=
ake here. I didn't recalled correctly my own idea. The idea is to inclu=
de in the second 64-byte chunk a 4-byte hash of the first chunk, not the op=
posite. <br><div><br></div></div></div></div></div>
--001a11447d762a4cbe053290151f--
|
