summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/7f/654eb7d09ead2878302f959c28e6dda5924122
blob: 5c24b7e919a24e5a29c7d64b314a2cae5c35145a (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
Return-Path: <vitteaymeric@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B1011BF5
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu,  4 Apr 2019 17:18:33 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-wm1-f46.google.com (mail-wm1-f46.google.com
	[209.85.128.46])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADDD67A6
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu,  4 Apr 2019 17:18:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wm1-f46.google.com with SMTP id o25so3917113wmf.5
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 04 Apr 2019 10:18:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
	h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version
	:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=Gt85DYeQntqOMWrnM6/pCKEu6Rj3p6kda2kQklL3hTk=;
	b=TR0OG5Rs2dgtrwnJXMLnvJCwPWNi/SC156Z+bz8WDoh23XSsd8V907T7kLOEU53UKA
	kK2PkeSN3bWAlG8WWKNGqIh8q1lp+XSDMtN0ecpjttRRg8RqXYMp19KjFfQeMo1eJtWn
	T+87VSBC36RGC4aJbO5ZowUosDyVXornl6v6YDoV70rA5gZO2KRw/SBAG0c99+ASM5jt
	3CoPEbkl5HFnFe6CXKVUdJzg7BeLbzyv9xS3HoP31kdX6AsXkifiYbui3EFviCf2pIck
	Y3VTr6vyw4dnlMN4uBHHKP8GdKPT7fAShhj5ssFL7OiycvMyAXufxkYSNaIw3rSVBa7s
	E4VA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
	h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=Gt85DYeQntqOMWrnM6/pCKEu6Rj3p6kda2kQklL3hTk=;
	b=p+XEXe2LXOZTtxQ9ktCfQfW69erWQxq2bZO+oALc14tIhyAi98RD088AIpxiMhPFsL
	jhPokpd7pJP0stlX66vkWEJ+8joBLxI0oBuE8w9n91QleSqawtSq+mX3StVKvRUal12P
	08P52mUJBLzWyZ19bPyq46GOSa55Oo+Pu7aQZNZkqHOsPm25ZqsOsWAxFda1uFrUfQkv
	W7lK+lAy3SlKdp0ZelNZxdVfl1WUNgLTaAfr/e2dop4LefJKFVRhDdTDw7gMSv/6bEUv
	IQ/Yb8VSRey8b1f1Adqvu9kvIuOrUl2S2XOR4n2M40dQ23Iwo8FWeCeWuAjMA88pyDTg
	/hwQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXlv9jQvSPwR0iS/7ZD7LGdORj949AGzMcTb5P3iaqabWBDlRWk
	vuiyiXoBc8YJffbl/SL4MPULrONw
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzuQNR93TGAJ6XiyrrSPJUh0JOGVGpV2Rb0FEiuXDanupCfcl8nWIIW+R97r6knZXBXsfhBpQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c054:: with SMTP id u20mr4957778wmc.100.1554398311129; 
	Thu, 04 Apr 2019 10:18:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.43.146] ([92.184.102.235])
	by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id
	t74sm4557064wmt.3.2019.04.04.10.18.29
	(version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
	Thu, 04 Apr 2019 10:18:30 -0700 (PDT)
To: ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>,
	Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
References: <IAFPSZAn6TYt348fmmnPznQ_ApG7pa48eMjzTgrjuVAt6fS1tNieRxlcIXyTATy2vjZCUn4wVQcsyDlyb_3Ip46BstFRikB95-lKewAZBEE=@protonmail.com>
From: Aymeric Vitte <vitteaymeric@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <d1cfa2e9-69e4-ee02-4c10-23b2b1a30e00@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 19:18:30 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <IAFPSZAn6TYt348fmmnPznQ_ApG7pa48eMjzTgrjuVAt6fS1tNieRxlcIXyTATy2vjZCUn4wVQcsyDlyb_3Ip46BstFRikB95-lKewAZBEE=@protonmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,URI_NOVOWEL
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 04 Apr 2019 19:12:25 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Smart Contracts Unchained
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2019 17:18:33 -0000

What if the smart contract platform(s) disappear?

The proposal induces a very centralized system, to my knowledge all of 
existing sidechains whether on bitcoin or ethereum are centralized, 
except lightning (if we forget that someone must watch what others are 
doing when you are on a trek in Nepal)

Now I don't get why a sidechain should be a blockchain on top on another 
one (given also that we can't consider bitcoin or ethereum as 
decentralized today, so the path might be long for the sidechains...), 
the latest is used to store the final state, the former does not have to 
store forever the intermediate states, then it could just use a 
decentralized system (not necessarilly blockchain-like) to store the 
intermediate states and maybe be a distributed escrow

I know, easy to say, please do it (why not), now the fact that 
sidechains claim to be decentralized or that they will be is just 
misleading people (that's not the case of your proposal but it does not 
say what happens if the platforms go down)


Le 04/04/2019 à 03:55, ZmnSCPxj via bitcoin-dev a écrit :
> https://zmnscpxj.github.io/bitcoin/unchained.html
>
> Smart contracts have traditionally been implemented as part of the consensus rules of some blokchain.  Often this means creating a new blockchain, or at least a sidechain to an existing blockchain.  This writeup proposes an alternative method without launching a separate blockchain or sidechain, while achieving security similar to federated sidechains and additional benefits to privacy and smart-contract-patching.
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev

-- 
Peersm : http://www.peersm.com
node-Tor : https://www.github.com/Ayms/node-Tor
GitHub : https://www.github.com/Ayms