1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
|
Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB95C4A4
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 22 May 2017 06:27:09 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from outmail148113.authsmtp.com (outmail148113.authsmtp.com
[62.13.148.113])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA52D12A
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 22 May 2017 06:27:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-c247.authsmtp.com (mail-c247.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.247])
by punt21.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id v4M6R6vE024561;
Mon, 22 May 2017 07:27:06 +0100 (BST)
Received: from petertodd.org (ec2-52-5-185-120.compute-1.amazonaws.com
[52.5.185.120]) (authenticated bits=0)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id v4M6R5ld006668
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Mon, 22 May 2017 07:27:06 +0100 (BST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by petertodd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E3A2C40094;
Mon, 22 May 2017 06:27:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 35DA42003B; Mon, 22 May 2017 02:27:04 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 02:27:04 -0400
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: shaolinfry <shaolinfry@protonmail.ch>
Message-ID: <20170522062704.GA29930@savin.petertodd.org>
References: <2zSehquWdVTgHhfHfQpAHZTGAyzv-XFias7rRsns0j6TpJryz6Fyvst3N0v_2_Q3KsYiyRn9qd9Gb1QLUxh5F11RAlVmvezYN8d4m8q5F-A=@protonmail.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5vNYLRcllDrimb99"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2zSehquWdVTgHhfHfQpAHZTGAyzv-XFias7rRsns0j6TpJryz6Fyvst3N0v_2_Q3KsYiyRn9qd9Gb1QLUxh5F11RAlVmvezYN8d4m8q5F-A=@protonmail.ch>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-Server-Quench: ad5c3784-3eb7-11e7-bcdf-0015176ca198
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
aAdMdAAUFVQNAgsB AmEbW1NeUlp7WWU7 bghPaBtcak9QXgdq
T0pMXVMcUgEVB34E WkoeUh90cQ0IfXZ4 ZQgzCnUIX0NycVt+
FxxTCGwHMGB9OjNL Bl1YdwJRcQRMLU5E Y1gxNiYHcQ5VPz4z
GA41ejw8IwAXAi1P WBBFFlMWS0sRAnYn Sh8dHClnFEIfSig2 Iho6Ql4B
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1038:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 52.5.185.120/25
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Barry Silbert segwit agreement
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 06:27:10 -0000
--5vNYLRcllDrimb99
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 02:12:08AM -0400, shaolinfry via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Someone sent me a copy of the Barry Silbert agreement, an agreement forge=
d between a select number of participants https://pastebin.com/VuCYteJh
It's interesting how changing the bit used to signal could be used as a way=
to
try to trick people into changing node software ASAP to support the hard-fo=
rk
code. Basically, the narrative would be that other software *doesn't* suppo=
rt
segwit, so you have to upgrade right away.
> A fourth option, first suggested to me by James Hilliard, was to make BIP=
148 miner triggered (MASF) with a lower threshold, above 50%. I coded this =
up a few weeks ago https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/master...shao=
linfry:segsignal but didnt get around to posting to the ML yet. This effect=
ively lowers the threshold from 95% to 65% as coded, or could be upped to 8=
0% or whatever was preferable.
In contrast this proposal wouldn't have that effect, because as you point o=
ut
it's compatibel with the existing segwit protocol once activated.
Smells like political engineering to me.
--=20
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
--5vNYLRcllDrimb99
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJZIoSzAAoJECSBQD2l8JH7+foH/0pRME4MlUl3ecUdVnEEsA1n
ESSA9kH3fMWegn2sSr6Q5X5MgdNzyQaRvPb5X9bQzv2ZJwm4/Pd3MfmzkYQapek8
b3pBMKDE+OJdjrf0o6fKlMclud+Z2JZ4JTIxYy+5Mn33ZnKwJNha47e6FwPLFr+u
WIQ3a2iC166xVpXg2WSzHm9LmsuiJFsMp6cKQWRGmwMZXqCZMR1XboB6r8iMA0af
OfpC5WISvVH4zgDZLq79gPEUpqBhkjvRw+1BcXx89jc/vsWptdtit/VBn8a/YNG0
TqPXpTL9ouY+l7G1At72x81OhSLGr5E0xSwwzbKm6toClpS2m7BVFB9lofMgvI4=
=M8+S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--5vNYLRcllDrimb99--
|
