1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
|
Return-Path: <karljohan-alm@garage.co.jp>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B73BAA5E
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 10 Mar 2019 00:43:59 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mo.garage.hdemail.jp (mo.garage.hdemail.jp [46.51.242.127])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69BEE81A
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 10 Mar 2019 00:43:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ip-10-217-1-36.ap-northeast-1.compute.internal
(localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by mo.garage.hdemail.jp (hde-mf-postfix) with SMTP id C8F6B14C0E7
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 10 Mar 2019 09:43:56 +0900 (JST)
(envelope-from karljohan-alm@garage.co.jp)
X-Received: from unknown (HELO mo.garage.hdemail.jp) (127.0.0.1)
by 0 with SMTP; 10 Mar 2019 09:43:56 +0900
X-Received: from mo.garage.hdemail.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by mo.garage.hdemail.jp (hde-ma-postfix) with ESMTP id BF8744C06D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 10 Mar 2019 09:43:56 +0900 (JST)
(envelope-from karljohan-alm@garage.co.jp)
Received: from gw23.oz.hdemail.jp
(ip-10-185-148-17.ap-northeast-1.compute.internal [10.185.148.17])
by mo.garage.hdemail.jp (hde-mf-postfix) with ESMTP id BD12D14C0E7
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 10 Mar 2019 09:43:56 +0900 (JST)
(envelope-from karljohan-alm@garage.co.jp)
X-Received: from mail-qk1-f200.google.com (lb06.oz.hdemail.jp [54.238.50.28])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by gw23.oz.hdemail.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 600AC148C10B
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 10 Mar 2019 09:43:56 +0900 (JST)
X-Received: by mail-qk1-f200.google.com with SMTP id j1so1306772qkl.23
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 09 Mar 2019 16:43:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=3ilURjriRbYCQa8LWF2X5hvk5D3REfY9on7ISRqRoWE=;
b=jdU+EkFg47on+4+lNKmBQfre7nPwxeM2DWeuiQCnYBFrJPyPlMtuVFOc2IlW4FYIT+
7ybLRqAKFpkiFj75tVZP3pl/Yv1yGHZGUUlEZHY7cguevvdIbkukpUsPRxmWBpGfL6in
eqH9j1xBf6885nVW7VwJB05mGcD4qaX6rBVWRjHJPAxbWMtZUCyiugn9AEGZvRtLOVhZ
KoRBledMZw60ruPn0L/156yzFZwwZlsAL5huQ5BScvyRK6pf0PBB5Y4jhreiFZwr7FLO
bh6NlTtCeskOtTmAUQSceU5uyRRp31Htiu336K+FFmo1NPorTAuf/LHAPGOrKEm0G6WY
G0pQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAULDrsOAMKAbFIAYQ7w8auaEw7j7912/GLEHW+bkIE0vaXhw0DM
9203oY8LPje0M8aznNGOolh4kEMqT//xxLopknMx5LL9CG1AK5pyJ4Xv23wPdsYwOw/WtKdVOju
2qf+a/UrtQL2VFJKqCbauvdI2YL2OIm0UfKBOYqeBdJD5mKKE4SG0Q4+SowRMSRa7L36ZfMJc/z
cZz7e0x7zJLLwyQB5lGDuquKuNDnDFi9gzlNgmW6iFBeBBITC8zafNfh6Yzgk9NdyMi5hH30Oqu
P8GZWLQOpIYzlbbo8K4nql+PoTYHQHEm2myJjE1cbxVla/kLXw1JLLYo487zCtYt4Vh0kIt4SDl
avzg11ecUdN8b7s3wmKpPc9ezPE=
X-Received: by 2002:a37:c0cb:: with SMTP id v72mr113370qkv.199.1552178634874;
Sat, 09 Mar 2019 16:43:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx3m3Kas6uphVlrQKLdXsjywbX+o20pz88K+Bbi4UI3pngHBzPxgaoSq8Grg1r3Q3bbJxLPMUGeUPAt7sYpxi0=
X-Received: by 2002:a37:c0cb:: with SMTP id v72mr113355qkv.199.1552178634645;
Sat, 09 Mar 2019 16:43:54 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALJw2w5OiKHk1oj1p=rmQ-jvYOdieOD=xHcPt9D0A_-nLKvv7Q@mail.gmail.com>
<939C132D-8599-4258-8F14-62E992BA9F51@mattcorallo.com>
In-Reply-To: <939C132D-8599-4258-8F14-62E992BA9F51@mattcorallo.com>
From: Karl-Johan Alm <karljohan-alm@garage.co.jp>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2019 09:43:43 +0900
Message-ID: <CALJw2w592Gid9cFZ21LKMMVr81_kRpY7rekrvs--dQdGamtaHA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Matt Corallo <lf-lists@mattcorallo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 10 Mar 2019 13:22:48 +0000
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Signet
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2019 00:43:59 -0000
Hi Matt,
On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 5:20 AM Matt Corallo <lf-lists@mattcorallo.com> wrot=
e:
>
> To make testing easier, it may make sense to keep the existing block head=
er format (and PoW) and instead apply the signature rules to some field in =
the coinbase transaction. This means SPV clients (assuming they only connec=
t to honest/trusted nodes) work as-is.
Keeping the PoW rule and moving the signature would mean DoS attacks
would be trivial as anyone could mine blocks without a signature in
them, unless you ramped up the difficulty, which would mean it's just
another testnet. It's a test network, admittedly, but I think it would
kind of defeat the purpose.
> A previous idea regarding reorgs (that I believe Greg came up with) is to=
allow multiple keys to sign blocks, with one signing no reorgs and one sig=
ning a reorg every few blocks, allowing users to choose the behavior they w=
ant.
Not sure how this would work in practice. The idea with signet is to
have an actual network that is occasionally reorged, i.e. it's a
global network (for those participating) that everyone agrees on. Not
sure how you would have choices there.
|
