summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/7e/b162a8696b08705ac157376cba33e9e30d74c0
blob: 99324cc24f76d48720ef6860d2d6fac5e2885c3b (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <tomh@thinlink.com>) id 1YPc9g-0002E9-PH
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sun, 22 Feb 2015 19:25:28 +0000
X-ACL-Warn: 
Received: from mail-pd0-f174.google.com ([209.85.192.174])
	by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1YPc9f-0001WE-Ny
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sun, 22 Feb 2015 19:25:28 +0000
Received: by pdbfp1 with SMTP id fp1so20251735pdb.9
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Sun, 22 Feb 2015 11:25:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to
	:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=ei8NtS6yJqSz/R6bhe6UrIE0UzuDfo06uzK1L6LP8xk=;
	b=P+9G6Ubs+yfL2KHDbXh5MtpnRZXBP8O0LDLVtKmtEVIY2DZ+LMXEPOMa1JY9+LyWW+
	C9htcFZ0srs0PZtLyynfP7zMdO4cy0W6uJf+OLlp/A98r06B5myuwZNRGNKSoo6MGktz
	rTY9j97Tek6G2Mdqhs1WqCqe30ISzATn3qQIfxTbr9AVxVDLkFq49Tw0PuRQ8EjkN7Fu
	9U9U3V+tL6fwXwWCJm6FUjnJGS/vgWJhw4YR+oFx13hsxts7zj30LMaATOfiWbFlfKk3
	6/S9NEeg6+8Ye1REuYpj19lc213sy6T34HQeKHu+wgT6hiQWGSXvfvqgNYA49vu5EqDb
	E7Yw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnRAXN3lG2toSPlDKEeiEfVc4OfHDX170PVqsUj4EnhGYLdD5jOFrR9xA0Ni94PYCMI2hRq
X-Received: by 10.70.24.37 with SMTP id r5mr13326612pdf.157.1424633121788;
	Sun, 22 Feb 2015 11:25:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.89] (99-6-44-248.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net.
	[99.6.44.248])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id x1sm5756799pdl.51.2015.02.22.11.25.20
	(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
	Sun, 22 Feb 2015 11:25:21 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54EA2D24.9070304@thinlink.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 11:25:24 -0800
From: Tom Harding <tomh@thinlink.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64;
	rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
References: <20150212064719.GA6563@savin.petertodd.org>
	<54EA0571.4050107@thinlink.com>
	<20150222171222.GA30816@savin.petertodd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150222171222.GA30816@savin.petertodd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
X-Headers-End: 1YPc9f-0001WE-Ny
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 19:25:28 -0000

On 2/22/2015 9:12 AM, Peter Todd wrote:
> Did you notice the even more obvious way to defeat ANYONECANPAY 
> scorched earth with that patch? 

Let's see.  I could pay 10 people 1 BTC each with one tx, then 
double-spend it with fees of 2BTC.  Now at least three of the 10 have to 
work together if they want to scorched-earth me, since an individual or 
two-party claw-back wouldn't have high enough fees. Oops!