summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/7e/6d42670dade5685315cffa33a5a824017436d4
blob: 5119109d408d7a3c19c3f5cb8bbe16e9cf1b3f58 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <andyparkins@gmail.com>) id 1QrVs8-00087k-Sl
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 11 Aug 2011 14:04:32 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 74.125.82.53 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=74.125.82.53; envelope-from=andyparkins@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-ww0-f53.google.com; 
Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53])
	by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1QrVs8-0005Re-6S
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 11 Aug 2011 14:04:32 +0000
Received: by wwf25 with SMTP id 25so1862984wwf.10
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Thu, 11 Aug 2011 07:04:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.61.136 with SMTP id w8mr317414wec.75.1313071466039;
	Thu, 11 Aug 2011 07:04:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dvr.localnet (mail.360visiontechnology.com [92.42.121.178])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a43sm1260925wed.4.2011.08.11.07.04.24
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
	Thu, 11 Aug 2011 07:04:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
To: Joel Joonatan Kaartinen <joel.kaartinen@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 15:04:22 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.38-2-686; KDE/4.6.3; i686; ; )
References: <CAJNQ0sudgAnr9hMUMt8grSNTYswunyNnp25Uzw5t17ucxTBoGA@mail.gmail.com>
	<201108110647.35194.andyparkins@gmail.com>
	<1313063130.18196.154.camel@mei>
In-Reply-To: <1313063130.18196.154.camel@mei>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart7822937.8DvMklt1uh";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201108111504.22851.andyparkins@gmail.com>
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(andyparkins[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
	0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Headers-End: 1QrVs8-0005Re-6S
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Change to multiple executables?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 14:04:33 -0000

--nextPart7822937.8DvMklt1uh
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 2011 August 11 Thursday, Joel Joonatan Kaartinen wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 06:47 +0100, Andy Parkins wrote:
> > Again you're missing my point... you are still shooting ideas down.
>=20
> And you're only shooting his actions down without indicating clearly

Yeah, shooting down a shooting down, which you've just shot down.  Where wi=
ll=20
it end?

> what you think ought to be done instead. What do you want him to say
> instead?

How about:

"This is a good idea, but we don't want to break backward compatibility a=20
little piece at a time.  Instead we'd like to collect all such changes into=
=20
one single compatibility breaking release.  Here's the wiki page you should=
=20
update; and here's the git branch you should push changes like this to."

> most suggestions you point at have been discussed about before

I know the application/protocol version split has been discussed before, bu=
t=20
please point me to the relevant discussion on: loading the block chain in=20
reverse; transaction only requests; checksumming removal; verack removal;=20
storing script parameters outside the script; and requesting blocks by=20
transaction hash instead of block hash.

If I've missed all of these discussions and their inevitable logically=20
indisputable rejection, I apologise.



Andy

=2D-=20
Dr Andy Parkins
andyparkins@gmail.com

--nextPart7822937.8DvMklt1uh
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAk5D4WYACgkQwQJ9gE9xL215mwCgorfkV3/KYzJx0Kv7/YOsaVsy
xmoAoM7hVIiJ8bvszt3J5NUUEloYWAJg
=KN2H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart7822937.8DvMklt1uh--