summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/79/427e860d9f2bc26de09aff22d99a7d0cdcfd28
blob: fb92b45f5357f136017f45edaab0eba0fb6fe150 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
Return-Path: <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 644AF273
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon,  3 Aug 2015 22:21:33 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-la0-f44.google.com (mail-la0-f44.google.com
	[209.85.215.44])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EFD2159
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon,  3 Aug 2015 22:21:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by labsr2 with SMTP id sr2so21150739lab.2
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 03 Aug 2015 15:21:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=xKh/cHzGj6rqCNJmV8PSVWfsCzSEZlNawj/Dr/UQD0U=;
	b=niYJfIGWJaQdLBC2c5MxqEjSkiGQC1Ie0FGEjFtWCfUZSEm33cZ3Q6C2ktdTqdh1mQ
	vlNkCvZ7xyS596Hg2MyrsDqJ/51Q4hOIh3NZNZ8DlWxXMR4G8BYWwH++NPJWn1XTwvh6
	ORVMqfTJwSyRFy3OEyNQ2o8YQEFT2/z33t48eLq2kd6yKSF/3LN87VXZqWIV1hQJotV7
	usdeF/kKx2U9r9WzNyf6njZ5iDZHOoaxv4V00LYJAELtpKSNy2BrBFaZ1S1yQAcsIWc7
	UndFC1ybrQ0ws54rXrFKZiPOw+R1XTOvyD0mtS9v4YYpYhhdKqSsoIsKK8k7f1NSMNY/
	8/Fw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.22.99 with SMTP id c3mr314339laf.32.1438640490566; Mon,
	03 Aug 2015 15:21:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.25.143.195 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 15:21:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1438640036.2828.0.camel@auspira.com>
References: <CABsx9T1E1s=4h-SxLTOAXK4GniZrUekcEb6zDdTDFG+h7X98MA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1438640036.2828.0.camel@auspira.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 18:21:30 -0400
Message-ID: <CABsx9T2A-Mz9z=TTifbL2_sKCDvy8coRpNse+0vff6EbXbp8cg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
To: GJB <balle@auspira.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0158b6c0665b0d051c6f9709
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, URIBL_SBL autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Eli Dourado on "governance"
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 22:21:33 -0000

--089e0158b6c0665b0d051c6f9709
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 6:13 PM, GJB <balle@auspira.com> wrote:

> Do you mean something like a Foundation?
>

No, I think one of the fundamental problems with the Foundation is it tries
to represent everybody's interests. The interests of exchanges are not
necessarily the same as end-users or miners, for example.

But it would make sense for exchanges (for example) to get together and
come to consensus on whatever issues are important to them, like the recent
consensus and then statement from "the Chinese miners" regarding the block
size issue.

-- 
--
Gavin Andresen

--089e0158b6c0665b0d051c6f9709
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On M=
on, Aug 3, 2015 at 6:13 PM, GJB <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bal=
le@auspira.com" target=3D"_blank">balle@auspira.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<b=
r><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:=
1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Do you mean something like a Foundation?<b=
r>
<div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5"></div></div></blockquote></div><div=
 class=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div>No, I think one of the fundamental problem=
s with the Foundation is it tries to represent everybody&#39;s interests. T=
he interests of exchanges are not necessarily the same as end-users or mine=
rs, for example.</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div><div class=3D"gm=
ail_extra">But it would make sense for exchanges (for example) to get toget=
her and come to consensus on whatever issues are important to them, like th=
e recent consensus and then statement from &quot;the Chinese miners&quot; r=
egarding the block size issue.</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div><br></d=
iv>-- <br><div class=3D"gmail_signature">--<br>Gavin Andresen<br></div>
</div></div>

--089e0158b6c0665b0d051c6f9709--