blob: c3ef18c7ba00af8be8967de2218874f80e2b0d95 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
|
Return-Path: <alicelarson@ruggedinbox.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39471488
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 27 Jul 2015 17:15:17 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: delayed 00:09:22 by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from ruggedinbox.com (ruggedinbox.com [94.156.77.238])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C160A1AB
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 27 Jul 2015 17:15:16 +0000 (UTC)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 17:05:48 +0000
From: Alice Larson <alicelarson@ruggedinbox.com>
To: milly@bitcoins.info
Message-ID: <2bad149d24c6659b924e27c500619c60@ruggedinbox.com>
X-Sender: alicelarson@ruggedinbox.com
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core and hard forks
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 17:15:17 -0000
> You are correct. It is also counterproductive to take cheap shots at
> vendors in order to garner consulting revenue. Measuring risk in a
> systematic way against known metrics is the way to go. Tweeting,
> blogging, and drama are generally counterproductive.
>
> When the issue is raised most of the developers shun the idea so until
> some of the developers become mature and experienced you will be left
> with all this teenager nonsense where everybody calls each other
> "trolls" on Reddit instead of engaging in real risk analysis.
The twitter teenage nonsense from Todd is ridiculous:
https://twitter.com/playatodd (warning, triggering)
Mike Hearn has mentioned a few times how Todd's habit of creating drama
on twitter and reddit every time anyone wants to change something in
Bitcoin in a way he doesn't like is driving away vendors. Openly
commenting on a female developers cleavage on twitter, as well as
referring to a female journalist as "naughty" is disgusting. Him
constantly hitting on women developers in Bitcoin is driving away
females.
|
