1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
|
Return-Path: <jgarzik@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DFDD21AC
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 30 Sep 2015 19:26:58 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com (mail-wi0-f175.google.com
[209.85.212.175])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEEF42A7
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 30 Sep 2015 19:26:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wiclk2 with SMTP id lk2so1876636wic.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 30 Sep 2015 12:26:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=nF9G/6VlUw5NU8hKvLWL62NjGsJsWrn8hwX59DCaPkA=;
b=O6Ynjwu5v1gm+Yq+IIyqNJ8sS0JEcjNKMmoF4Q7UsgFFJAB9l4r1JhuJf4IvPeNerU
SwUOvrO48MBoDlZ22BHMqXUnAvdZhTUm90D1+JusqE5gv+AF2ocp5Pu1d29x+TM1hwD9
olNw5hN97qs7Naxq+xyym85XKKB2+Q5kA4cZZYTNxpsAsLG1OTg0qd+H9SDZSs44hcpH
KiFZtvHwLeo/oPDppwhkAvN8EZoc6YDr4Xb8421eTGScVWlC84AFVE/d39YA1mvR7ZBJ
BZrjBWQWAV9JyLQs8dF698jINu8F4Z46FTNVvaoZ42G0p/Hop8jcga8y6lITbtVUv09B
djYg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.90.229 with SMTP id bz5mr35613708wib.46.1443641216636;
Wed, 30 Sep 2015 12:26:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.28.158.9 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 12:26:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+w+GKRKGS=KZrLtiW8Zbn4EQH_TELfQR+TfrADCMXLR22Q+tw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20150927185031.GA20599@savin.petertodd.org>
<CA+w+GKRCVr-9TVk66utp7xLRgTxNpxYoj3XQE-6y_N8JS6eO6Q@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAS2fgSEDGBd67m7i8zCgNRqtmQrZyZMj7a5TsYo41Dh=tdhHQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+w+GKRKGS=KZrLtiW8Zbn4EQH_TELfQR+TfrADCMXLR22Q+tw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 15:26:56 -0400
Message-ID: <CADm_WcbJoH27H9ckr5sfmE0gh7YbSjKr1uLse0s3b4GTT+jEAA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@gmail.com>
To: Mike Hearn <hearn@vinumeris.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043be276e69f9b0520fbe9a5
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Let's deploy BIP65 CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY!
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 19:26:58 -0000
--f46d043be276e69f9b0520fbe9a5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Mike Hearn via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Several people have asked several times now: given the very real and
> widely acknowledged downsides that come with a soft fork, *what* is the
> specific benefit to end users of doing them?
>
Field experience shows it successfully delivers new features to end users
without a global software upgrade.
--f46d043be276e69f9b0520fbe9a5
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Mike Hearn via bitcoin-de=
v <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation=
.org" target=3D"_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>></span=
> wrote:<br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquo=
te class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc so=
lid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div clas=
s=3D"gmail_quote"><div>Several people have asked several times now: given t=
he very real and widely acknowledged downsides that come with a soft fork, =
<b>what</b>=C2=A0is the specific benefit to end users of doing them?=C2=A0<=
br></div><div></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div><div cla=
ss=3D"gmail_extra">Field experience shows it successfully delivers new feat=
ures to end users without a global software upgrade.</div><div class=3D"gma=
il_extra"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div><div class=3D"gmai=
l_extra"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div></div>
--f46d043be276e69f9b0520fbe9a5--
|
