1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
|
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <jgarzik@bitpay.com>) id 1X88O3-00077M-0A
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Fri, 18 Jul 2014 13:39:47 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of bitpay.com
designates 74.125.82.177 as permitted sender)
client-ip=74.125.82.177; envelope-from=jgarzik@bitpay.com;
helo=mail-we0-f177.google.com;
Received: from mail-we0-f177.google.com ([74.125.82.177])
by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1X88O1-00038m-4l
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Fri, 18 Jul 2014 13:39:46 +0000
Received: by mail-we0-f177.google.com with SMTP id w62so4608288wes.36
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Fri, 18 Jul 2014 06:39:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
bh=Ib2zf++IgdTxJEIdN/Jbn59OHFwd3wC1jdSjmSEH29U=;
b=kBSK5jhsJQOSSVAV63//oEp4DVV0ObsGNvurFJGBmFr6ODLgyIAEASKTd+meG5FCa6
WrpAAt3POHqbxTxh6z64yj3rLdzm2MKvN+unKvLmbd9FbddnSf/1frC5yXt3Mz1fv2B8
wUXEQU/+ESwA/7FyFFCuagNm1w5M85UMJHLEPq3uJ57uWtUv0ucQ+LBYMLTPZAWOYw9o
0TIehs3FIMRjnbtkcSJ3FIc4DtbV3KhBme0NtIfzal+ruQoEsEYQyntfaoNE1uliMppG
7DAktHxbcoPpVdiJirQPNdmJJzqaiZYHKptMIkIz9kRD2kzy1B8MC54IogB0dPnw4UDQ
46CQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlL+Kki5kcVRErCxPsOly7xtINQDzA/TTXrYwTmbOEUkAQUkZEQTsgl4Q3yx9aWkkmqN+Ru
X-Received: by 10.181.11.232 with SMTP id el8mr7899903wid.57.1405690775916;
Fri, 18 Jul 2014 06:39:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.194.5.67 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 06:39:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAJna-HhhqYGSVwapvR_5yvRY3gc6wXGaNXm_dkP4Tid7F1SsLw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJHLa0PWF38N0-CFY9b3FzFdN2NfLduWHCeCQHXQOKirDYn0Pw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAJna-HhhqYGSVwapvR_5yvRY3gc6wXGaNXm_dkP4Tid7F1SsLw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@bitpay.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 09:39:15 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJHLa0NVZOKCPMqRaGZyVnp0=0H0=AacRzKd_kaX1rVKH_pVFQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: slush <slush@centrum.cz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1X88O1-00038m-4l
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Decentralizing ming
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 13:39:47 -0000
Before they got traction, yes. But he projected a bit, as anyone
could, to see the trend.
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 1:22 PM, slush <slush@centrum.cz> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@bitpay.com> wrote:
>>
>> Historical note: On one hand, Satoshi seemed to dislike the early
>> emergence of GPU mining pools quite a bit.
>
>
> To my knowledge, Satoshi left the project before mining pools got a
> traction.
>
> slush
--
Jeff Garzik
Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist
BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/
|
