1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
|
Return-Path: <bnagaev@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::133])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6E00C0037
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 16 Jan 2024 23:40:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C77D540189
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 16 Jan 2024 23:40:51 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org C77D540189
Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org;
dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com
header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20230601 header.b=eZvaVshi
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
URIBL_SBL_A=0.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 7rUSH6lD5dUg
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 16 Jan 2024 23:40:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-il1-x136.google.com (mail-il1-x136.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::136])
by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85DCC4011D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 16 Jan 2024 23:40:50 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 85DCC4011D
Received: by mail-il1-x136.google.com with SMTP id
e9e14a558f8ab-3606de7f4bdso47259555ab.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 16 Jan 2024 15:40:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1705448449; x=1706053249;
darn=lists.linuxfoundation.org;
h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from
:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date
:message-id:reply-to;
bh=rGt5VO6npf6zi+diH7z9mt9gpDVXhQsWMp5caJrMIR8=;
b=eZvaVshi54ZhAKRVxBvwTBYGu5XcSQqon7msJT19GNT2m/3gCGdmQD9rxTJE1ATosn
R9rDhQufm6e3pJbDshk8whd5OrP51tdgpS/J9MNHn3E3nqFIVBSjq4PXaj3zfo3MVTZe
5rI2AwRiRS0equrXeIlG648CRhz9D036rKE0Zhw6q/ec6jq5SbH0uqGX1nJN8C9kiL2l
Oqu3y2GS4o993VtUnBpatMQnQ5WgwSomgm8Q3DwnsDaq3S4ZiY8j5FutRekjlOWiTbS0
qdMRIITno6XvhO/gf0RJJ6dVxbW9XsS1ua8luDS0fSAdasHCtGtD1UDO+2WTJRUmRM1L
Vv6Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1705448449; x=1706053249;
h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from
:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc
:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=rGt5VO6npf6zi+diH7z9mt9gpDVXhQsWMp5caJrMIR8=;
b=Y9n+KnAe0ijV4QuSwuOgNFsGhDj+hX9r0e2uj1wqWQCk5FPaGZhcmaEgdHBihiwOhV
rJNvX/QZKJWnqdhHEnOvX1xd92FO+NjvbeNSvG8AULSNpmfVpwFpKTbq1O+Ww/izcbkE
ORkMvLqXNFCKK80M4R8QF+wNeRklc4DSVKeubPwI/oknUSxsWnwsvDwsDCcoHIo1Vd8C
9vdAxnKrEShQ2q2neZfTxBW4KbEGWGxriEa4UsJLqr1lTNjwGkST8m6MVpbMUgL1U1gL
KDwhOiYwJ6DAKGgVtHdGH9cZj3iNyHM7O1vtFXLv5qbM32aQuQ3Oei8JP6r6bbTevK9X
3Z5g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwCzHw7gT4Kav0BHib8UqhuzYTkfWs5JVNM4IhUUPQQiR4IAtqH
DEX0kg0bROgFZTO4wJg+jjm8OkTX2J+P1wMBrVmNRfWG
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFTsDZfISNVECupnu/JLvFvJG34jP/19jfW0sTeXccQbOGteuRthmW4mzCFy96YwykNlq2bPK2U5Jn1pXPPcfM=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:c7cf:0:b0:361:8cb5:5a97 with SMTP id
g15-20020a92c7cf000000b003618cb55a97mr1391286ilk.50.1705448449543; Tue, 16
Jan 2024 15:40:49 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAMHHROxsKuqzVsU90srQBNDj4redB11uqB2JxmDK=G1LDw9_HA@mail.gmail.com>
<CALeFGL2AZfVqchy=GWTDyehKXJkjYtCaonYFigv7ctHUnsxPfg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAMHHROwP8guVcy3yV09B=PYQscTcnGtNGMheFdvJM4ZYdWTSYw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMHHROwP8guVcy3yV09B=PYQscTcnGtNGMheFdvJM4ZYdWTSYw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nagaev Boris <bnagaev@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 20:40:12 -0300
Message-ID: <CAFC_Vt7EKhipSECtpa87fx5Ff1eFwfjn19P=9GONOcXFFhQYOA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Greg Tonoski <gregtonoski@gmail.com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 02:06:08 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [BUG]: Bitcoin blockspace price discrimination
put simple transactions at disadvantage
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 23:40:52 -0000
On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 10:21=E2=80=AFAM Greg Tonoski via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > Price of blockspace should be the same for any data (1 byte =3D 1 byt=
e,
> > irrespectively of location inside or outside of witness), e.g. 205/205
> > and 767/767 bytes in the examples above.
> >
> > "Should" ... to what end?
>
> "Should" in order to avoid hazard of centralization. A single bidder
> who takes advantage of "buy 1 get 3 megabytes free" may outcompete a
> number of individuals whose simple transactions recieve
> anti-preferential treatment - "buy 1 get 0.33 megabytes free" in
> aggregate. There is the illustration at:
> "https://gregtonoski.github.io/bitcoin/segwit-mispricing/Comparison_of_4M=
B_and_1.33MB_blocks_in_Bitcoin.pdf".
It is not sufficient to be a centralized sender to utilize this
advanage. The sender has to store data in the blockchain which itself
is not the best utilization of money, even given the discount. Also
what is the danger of centralization of such senders? The dangerous
centralization is the centralization of real bitcoin sending, which
has already happened - exchanges utilize batch transaction sending,
saving on fees over a regular bitcoin sender, because they avoid
change creation. This has nothing to do with witness discount, though.
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
--=20
Best regards,
Boris Nagaev
|
