summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/73/05f9c70134186f74ede97abcb438a877c25b0c
blob: 795e835f60b6830673b558547818f361e268f292 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E388E1071
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri,  4 Sep 2015 03:50:50 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from outmail148102.authsmtp.net (outmail148102.authsmtp.net
	[62.13.148.102])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B836154
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri,  4 Sep 2015 03:50:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-c235.authsmtp.com (mail-c235.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.235])
	by punt16.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t843om19048341;
	Fri, 4 Sep 2015 04:50:48 +0100 (BST)
Received: from muck (030-098.web.ny.np1.net [64.61.30.98] (may be forged))
	(authenticated bits=128)
	by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t843oirK010303
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
	Fri, 4 Sep 2015 04:50:47 +0100 (BST)
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 23:50:45 -0400
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Dave Scotese <dscotese@litmocracy.com>
Message-ID: <20150904035045.GA9821@muck>
References: <CADm_WcZyK6LUcuKqSEuR-q0hTZOC3EdJsqY1HrS_ow0knDY=7A@mail.gmail.com>
	<55E8A246.7030102@bitcartel.com>
	<CALhpmH0POEpJtAXPZdo92onCoiRFx6EwvNs=xpy-49_jRXgBHw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGLBAhfUky0=5KoUcNxUV0N-jayHAx1Y+Ri3GdvrtMNSZA8tjg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAGLBAhfUky0=5KoUcNxUV0N-jayHAx1Y+Ri3GdvrtMNSZA8tjg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Server-Quench: 208a7d9f-52b8-11e5-b399-002590a15da7
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
	http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
	aAdMdgYUC1AEAgsB AmMbW1BeVV17XWQ7 bQ5PawRDYUpQVg11
	VUBOXVMcUA1sAkNY RGUeUxlxdwYIfHh3 ZwhgXngKWxBzI1t4
	QBxcCGwHMGJ9OmMW WV1YdwFReQMbfxoR O1cxNiYHcQ5VPz4z
	GA41ejw8IwAXAgVt ClhVdRoJWUsAHzA9 TBkeHDIpdQAA
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1023:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 64.61.30.98/587
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
	anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP 100 specification
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 03:50:51 -0000


--x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 01:34:54PM -0700, Dave Scotese via bitcoin-dev wrot=
e:
> I have seen "1M" mean 1,000,000 bytes as well as 1,048,576bytes and
> 1,024,000 bytes.  I believe the best policy is to use "megabyte" to mean
> 2^20 (1,048,576) bytes.  Kb always means 1024 bytes, even when a lot peop=
le
> round it, so I like the K spec best.  I also see value in having human
> readable data.  The spec should nail down these details.

The IEC standard is to use the prefix MiB for 2^20 bytes:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_prefix

--=20
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
000000000000000010f9e95aff6454fedb9d0a4b92a4108e9449c507936f9f18

--x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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==
=MD+x
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn--