1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
|
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <timo.hanke@web.de>) id 1VcrNC-0005AW-6W
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sun, 03 Nov 2013 06:41:22 +0000
Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.14])
by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1VcrNA-00022A-IL
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sun, 03 Nov 2013 06:41:22 +0000
Received: from crunch ([66.68.149.162]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb102) with ESMTPA
(Nemesis) id 0MJCSM-1VfcWZ1FSE-002qlc for
<bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Sun, 03 Nov 2013 07:41:14 +0100
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 01:41:11 -0500
From: Timo Hanke <timo.hanke@web.de>
To: Thomas Voegtlin <thomasv1@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <20131103064111.GI16611@crunch>
References: <trinity-ba3941a0-f758-4372-b431-c64e9b44328a-1382635758149@3capp-gmx-bs09>
<CAJna-HjgpRhLdVGh+prx54VezHaH1vXGpPotW1Xkz2tiAiWrbg@mail.gmail.com>
<526BDEC2.2090709@gmx.de>
<CAJna-HgH1g8iiSvxXrJuga808SQJ6DKo4AYw4fxpwTRCsL+EyQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAPg+sBiuLJJV3pB-EF3O9sgB_Z3tuLhEg9k=A9mcxJvgy3UQSw@mail.gmail.com>
<52721F47.30206@gmx.de>
<CAJna-Hj+q7oyTj8SWiVESPt5Web-mLuDhv7yA8zF5wRD81aBXA@mail.gmail.com>
<5274C99A.8060304@gmx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5274C99A.8060304@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:UlP5dCHoGuomhmnSpf7SILK31iHfzKdpr0vdM7KPkBWxwMegUWl
3t426oXpAZd4jFEkwIyY8bESR7a8yvxtTDi8gDECMX/XFNlI1oCzcOee8mbqJgClFBWH47V
wOune7VqUq3N5TumRKncPdODn4ejWA35ZwcXlGMXLE5pfDmOnMtP0L4IGWwVWcE3YR7DwTm
qRavC3Avrsw1Q1ncx0twQ==
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(timo.hanke[at]web.de)
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust [212.227.15.14 listed in list.dnswl.org]
-0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
domain
X-Headers-End: 1VcrNA-00022A-IL
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal to replace BIP0039
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: timo.hanke@web.de
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 06:41:22 -0000
On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 10:44:58AM +0100, Thomas Voegtlin wrote:
>
> >To be specific, we (in cooperation with / inspired by Timo Hanke)
> >developed method how to prove that the seed generated by Trezor
> >has been created using combination of computer-provided entropy
> >and device-provided entropy, without leaking full private
> >information to other computer, just because we want Trezor to be
> >blackbox-testable and fully deterministic (seed generation is
> >currently the only operation which uses any source of RNG).
> >
>
> Thanks for the explanation. Here is how I understand how it works,
> please correct me if I'm wrong:
>
> The user's computer picks a random number a, the Trezor picks a
> random number b.
> Trezor adds a and b in the secp256k1 group, and this creates a
> master private key k.
> Trezor sends the corresponding master public key K to the computer.
> Thus, the computer can check that K was derived from a, without knowing b.
No. You mean the computer would use B for this check?
(k,K) could be rigged by Trezor, who computes b as k-a.
Timo
> This also allows the computer to check that any bitcoin address
> derived from K is derived from a, without leaking b. (and
> reciprocally)
>
> However, it seems to me that this property will work only with bip32
> public derivations; if a private derivation is used, don't you need
> to know k?
>
>
>
--
Timo Hanke
PGP 1EFF 69BC 6FB7 8744 14DB 631D 1BB5 D6E3 AB96 7DA8
|
