1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
|
Return-Path: <joseph@lightning.network>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C97078FE
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 19 Aug 2015 21:27:15 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pa0-f44.google.com (mail-pa0-f44.google.com
[209.85.220.44])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5941B1F3
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 19 Aug 2015 21:27:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pacdd16 with SMTP id dd16so2922416pac.2
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 19 Aug 2015 14:27:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=lightning.network; s=google;
h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version
:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to;
bh=+cf6k58vNYAn0PRqEwvaNHXKrImSZ4GunbktNlCv+pE=;
b=CZcVbv87UZqRtrZlGUkcHVcCd4OqDxHaHM/p3VSpwgxSdi8Xrj4/KgrEuP245MKk4/
56v94FjBYmRNGncfMoHunfjFzNQOwc9jAL9UCn6AVxEg7+acTUEFDEn04PqZcKx2wT2e
NvTN+r6qAD/9q17HF4Mu2R+WSdM9q4tycRBA4=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references
:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to;
bh=+cf6k58vNYAn0PRqEwvaNHXKrImSZ4GunbktNlCv+pE=;
b=GoYpDX2LkxY3V+bwCKEUOTu7+Sd6bsFK6jlYx1OWWFn8jRfRS1F+tGq0yKQTuS5EK+
kMVtpQLpidVEeY1FN2poANvq64/C4uNl448Ih4CWVi2+Gkkr3Lm+UvXy4hH0xd1VCDOp
p1AZXJhlTNy1sR89h0HgCvV7OfisX0Mt7jyUhsBom2DFAAMcoSQHzNSSYk9N87ZOeVsV
yuuOAYJvI2VQ1RVsVoDjXPpDGWxu6S6384sccHpW3qZvwsetLGp4XkReH7cdbVT5dGEf
Su5JWr4g4IYIghABNCTbCJC9aHvpQ4zqQrG5nQBJI9M2MnRW6k4qsc11p0Rywbq5/mkN
46jA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkG8VMb3NWo8F50ibrI3AsQw4v3VfJKknLFEOCQzvVyAk1GDW28acbu9ISQM/ouFrzzyZrt
X-Received: by 10.68.190.10 with SMTP id gm10mr28539816pbc.5.1440019634953;
Wed, 19 Aug 2015 14:27:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([4.16.40.19])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e2sm1906781pdk.61.2015.08.19.14.27.14
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Wed, 19 Aug 2015 14:27:14 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 14:27:10 -0700
From: Joseph Poon <joseph@lightning.network>
To: Mark Friedenbach <mark@friedenbach.org>
Message-ID: <20150819212710.GA17777@lightning.network>
References: <CADJgMztgE_GkbrsP7zCEHNPA3P6T=aSFfhkcN-q=gVhWP0vKXg@mail.gmail.com>
<CADJgMzv8G3EqLBwEYRHJZ+fO_Jwzy0koi2pJ_iNRkXmoVarGcg@mail.gmail.com>
<CABm2gDod9z6ksgaCv86qFCyKLTQSL3+oNns+__5H77hVhs05DQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAOG=w-sbOcaogkic2i4A5eZnBQ79LUibsGy0dyKyvQg53ktY1Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAOG=w-sbOcaogkic2i4A5eZnBQ79LUibsGy0dyKyvQg53ktY1Q@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [BIP-draft] CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY - An opcode for
relative locktime
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 21:27:15 -0000
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 09:21:36AM -0700, Mark Friedenbach via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> If anyone feels strongly about this, please speak up.
>
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:37 AM, Jorge Tim??n <
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> > I repeated my nit on https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/179
I am also indifferent, but also dislike technical debt.
It should maybe be noted for those who wish to do/write-code-for mempool
transaction selection (irrespective of one's opinion on it) that lower
is better, since transactions with shorter relative locks are
transactions with "higher priority".
--
Joseph Poon
|
