1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
|
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <jeanpaulkogelman@me.com>) id 1VYVwB-0001Ms-Er
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 22 Oct 2013 06:59:31 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of me.com
designates 17.172.220.239 as permitted sender)
client-ip=17.172.220.239; envelope-from=jeanpaulkogelman@me.com;
helo=st11p02mm-asmtp004.mac.com;
Received: from st11p02mm-asmtpout004.mac.com ([17.172.220.239]
helo=st11p02mm-asmtp004.mac.com)
by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
id 1VYVwA-0003cx-Gu for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 22 Oct 2013 06:59:31 +0000
Received: from [10.0.1.20] ([216.19.182.8]) by st11p02mm-asmtp004.mac.com
(Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.08(7.0.4.27.7) 64bit
(built Aug
22 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0MV200CIC62RUD90@st11p02mm-asmtp004.mac.com>
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue,
22 Oct 2013 06:59:17 +0000 (GMT)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure
engine=2.50.10432:5.10.8794,1.0.431,0.0.0000
definitions=2013-10-22_02:2013-10-22, 2013-10-22,
1970-01-01 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0
suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam
adjust=0
reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1308280000
definitions=main-1310210174
Content-type: multipart/signed;
boundary="Apple-Mail=_71EF7958-DC2D-439F-AE66-252E6192E884";
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Jean-Paul Kogelman <jeanpaulkogelman@me.com>
In-reply-to: <52661DB7.7040805@250bpm.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 23:59:18 -0700
Message-id: <FAE2A544-9295-4087-96DE-D4602D109CBD@me.com>
References: <791a727f-2188-4848-bd77-ea733c8c5c2c@me.com>
<201310211947.59640.luke@dashjr.org> <52661DB7.7040805@250bpm.com>
To: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@250bpm.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
for more information. [URIs: bitcoin.it]
X-Headers-End: 1VYVwA-0003cx-Gu
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Revisiting the BIPS process, a proposal
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 06:59:31 -0000
--Apple-Mail=_71EF7958-DC2D-439F-AE66-252E6192E884
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
> I wanted to have a look at how the whole Bitcoin thing works recently.
> Being a distributed application, I've searched for the protocol spec.
> What I found were two wiki pages (Protocol & ProtocolRules) that looked
> more like notes someone wrote down while implementing the application.
>
> Have I missed something? Is there any effort underway trying to produce
> a decent spec? If not so, I am willing to help with that.
Have you seen: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Protocol_specification ?
--Apple-Mail=_71EF7958-DC2D-439F-AE66-252E6192E884
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org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=eTlz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Apple-Mail=_71EF7958-DC2D-439F-AE66-252E6192E884--
|
