summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/70/85ae42a17deb1892d995d2b576a17043453b5f
blob: 6ec107649b464b5761c0e989be6dec986111d2f6 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <mark@monetize.io>) id 1WO9HX-0003it-UM
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 13 Mar 2014 17:18:59 +0000
Received: from mail-yh0-f43.google.com ([209.85.213.43])
	by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1WO9HW-0001ez-L3
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 13 Mar 2014 17:18:59 +0000
Received: by mail-yh0-f43.google.com with SMTP id b6so1346611yha.2
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Thu, 13 Mar 2014 10:18:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent
	:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=TfCh85RU0jT754SYVEtx3XvHVRtTfWUpi6u5QX238Eg=;
	b=lbl5OMk/fKUinizb4zpjFEEbDmTceJPr/X4k8bR7yXMIr30Yu9NjY5eBmDmE1jrXRU
	P1wVIFRIEKPXwlBznac5pSzRO8JPGOh9amFCu58AukcCxUzFiVMTfXD/R9yxckyOzo6B
	xI8X5bd2Vcr7xBxjE4FDoRo3JhIcDoNADxp+l0Ewg7qgfslZ5YfwEjhjo2Ac/U8ftqXa
	XxNZJ6gnwidkuZUeAdIlRcDgNL30085R1pkJ0lIGX95bvGJqkaa4yBMdE4poqF7hIzOA
	X2N6vR4vyGfSlC//BriiDGwD0E2UmpNFgt3q2T02yQypw1l65J9YS7WOp+7NeieKQq/r
	5m5w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkAQxXODsUfkHz1cUN8mmpKutBwe86rIH9RTWA/Un5A9FKI6SR/fIHrYYA2RGiE5o/oqxFx
X-Received: by 10.236.89.3 with SMTP id b3mr4168213yhf.54.1394731133152;
	Thu, 13 Mar 2014 10:18:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.127.149] (adsl-71-131-179-45.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net.
	[71.131.179.45])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id e5sm7921755yhj.14.2014.03.13.10.18.51
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
	(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Thu, 13 Mar 2014 10:18:52 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5321E87B.8050908@monetize.io>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 10:18:51 -0700
From: Mark Friedenbach <mark@monetize.io>
Organization: Monetize.io Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
References: <CAKaEYhK4oXH3hB7uS3=AEkA6r0VB5OYyTua+LOP18rq+rYajHg@mail.gmail.com>	<52852C2D.9020103@gmail.com>
	<52853D8A.6010501@monetize.io>	<CAJHLa0M6CkoDbD6FFixf9-mmhug7DvehSWCJ+EHWVxUDuwNiBg@mail.gmail.com>	<EE02A310-8604-4811-B2D0-FC32C72C20F3@grabhive.com>	<CAJHLa0OMcTCgGESi-F4jT2NA3FyCeMYbD_52j47t3keEYBfK8g@mail.gmail.com>	<CA+s+GJBSGPBQWWYR1NYSc2E4Y1BWAn8zf7xsu4wQ1O8cA8OWbw@mail.gmail.com>	<CAJHLa0NEEppHg_Lmi_Oxnz_gPSHZPfQpeg+-8MrvFYDmdM83-g@mail.gmail.com>	<CANEZrP2O4hDBiCNvO1oV5X7OtnQ4xVDD=RtozQY8ESRHgXQu9w@mail.gmail.com>	<CAJHLa0PB-V+KgEr5uCj+mceESggp8G4MmLGHHpz2UD_R_w-zfQ@mail.gmail.com>	<5321D95C.2070402@gmail.com>
	<CAJHLa0MrLGDVO7LFpUSb+LCxNjKebQQ7UHSwyWPYwzWw5WcbAw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJHLa0MrLGDVO7LFpUSb+LCxNjKebQQ7UHSwyWPYwzWw5WcbAw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
X-Headers-End: 1WO9HW-0001ez-L3
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] moving the default display to mbtc
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 17:19:00 -0000

This ship may have already sailed, but...

Using milli- and micro- notation for currency units is also not very
well supported. Last time this thread was active, I believe there was a
suggestion to use 1 XBT == 1 uBTC. This would bring us completely within
the realm of supported behavior in accounting applications.

On 03/13/2014 09:29 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Alan Reiner <etotheipi@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Of course, as Mike said, this ship may have already sailed, but if
>> there's any way to revisit this, I'm there.  We're just about to do
>> another Armory release and could support this very easily.
> 
> mBTC now just means the issue -will- be revisited in the future.  Just
> a question of when, not if.
> 
> People and software in various nations handle big numbers for small
> values (e.g. Yen) just fine.
> People and software do -not- handle extra decimal places well, field
> experience shows.
> 
> <vendor hat: on>  To roll out QuickBooks support --without converting
> any numbers, a key financial attribute-- mBTC is simply insufficient
> today, not in the future.
> 
> I also argue that it is a security risk, as follows:  To support
> accounting packages limited to 2 decimal places, decimal point
> conversion must be performed.  This produces a situation where your
> accounting system shows numbers that do not visually match the numbers
> in the bitcoin software.  That, in turn, making auditing more
> difficult, particularly for outsiders.
> 
> Shipping with mBTC defaults was decidedly unwise, considering that --
> like BTC -- it fails to solve existing, known problems that uBTC can
> solve, and considering the inevitable mBTC->uBTC switch.
>