1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
|
Return-Path: <dave@dtrt.org>
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2002BC0001
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 6 Mar 2021 20:24:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06BCF605E1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 6 Mar 2021 20:24:34 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8,
DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org (amavisd-new);
dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=dtrt.org
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id Ma0anng0Tyo3
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 6 Mar 2021 20:24:33 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: delayed 16:40:00 by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from newmail.dtrt.org (newmail.dtrt.org
[IPv6:2600:3c03::f03c:91ff:fe7b:78d1])
by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 236726067B
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 6 Mar 2021 20:24:33 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dtrt.org;
s=20201208; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:
Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:
Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc
:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:
List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
bh=mguujHhSROTIuU6FFMPRxJIB8aa/Smt98JWDXyLLsq4=; b=001KEtYlxjTP8yr0zglVbkqB1t
6eowwUu+QdrtTskZEGAOLLBC+C7FsFSeFry3CfmF6CJe0CIhxG8HMt7sTcKBKKVUuTQFb4DQ+ZVJL
EirXKeeHOPOD27uSCS5i8cMKNYuAPqOYXtiZbxFRJ/vWpC/VUjIcwbnsALq1rt/332N0=;
Received: from harding by newmail.dtrt.org with local (Exim 4.92)
(envelope-from <dave@dtrt.org>)
id 1lIdTT-0004Gu-7P; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 10:24:31 -1000
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2021 10:23:50 -1000
From: "David A. Harding" <dave@dtrt.org>
To: Matt Corallo <lf-lists@mattcorallo.com>
Message-ID: <20210306202350.qdcpvxgedn6qhuxa@ganymede>
References: <20210306034343.fhwrxmq6gbb2os5m@ganymede>
<2a6955d6-d242-89f5-d622-82889d499cc0@mattcorallo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="unrug5igkh2424as"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2a6955d6-d242-89f5-d622-82889d499cc0@mattcorallo.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Taproot activation proposal "Speedy Trial"
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2021 20:24:34 -0000
--unrug5igkh2424as
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 01:11:01PM -0500, Matt Corallo wrote:
> I'm really unsure that three months is a short enough time window that th=
ere
> wouldn't be a material effort to split the network with divergent consens=
us
> rules.=20
I oppose designing activation mechanisms with the goal of preventing
other people from effectively exercising self determination over what
consensus rules their nodes enforce.
Three months was chosen because it's long enough to give miners a
reasonable enough amount of time to activate taproot but it's also short
enough that it doesn't delay any of the existing proposals with roughly
one-year timelines. As such, I think it has the potential to gain
acceptance from multiple current factions (even if it doesn't ever gain
their full approval), allowing us to move forward with rough social
consensus and to gain useful information from the attempt that can
inform future decisions.
-Dave
--unrug5igkh2424as
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=W/k4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--unrug5igkh2424as--
|
