1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <zgenjix@yahoo.com>) id 1SOvNO-0001BH-6k
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 30 Apr 2012 18:31:10 +0000
X-ACL-Warn:
Received: from nm34-vm1.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([98.138.229.81])
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with smtp (Exim 4.76)
id 1SOvNN-0002Gi-CJ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 30 Apr 2012 18:31:10 +0000
Received: from [98.138.90.50] by nm34.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
30 Apr 2012 18:31:03 -0000
Received: from [98.138.89.193] by tm3.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
30 Apr 2012 18:31:03 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1051.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
30 Apr 2012 18:31:03 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 923963.32456.bm@omp1051.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 44195 invoked by uid 60001); 30 Apr 2012 18:31:03 -0000
X-YMail-OSG: Fo3c6koVM1mzNL9smrlHJGseqxi2o9DG1LjAdNttwF4vTjE
j_TJ1cIaXpsbnge2Q6C4zwdk.iL5Y2AGU8_KL3UUtUBLCUBlDHnf0SVSgJ1h
LGrtKIzXIkKs6V4vZYQ60Zqkl17fByylx6I9wipP2_eRFPhnX8lmXqJHGkri
yh7qwqKO.2edr59dvVcOXO_0CfFCGIlkulaJDlTBA1vh7YvCGQZV4Zxy0N.Q
yyqvBH3umVsoapVB7J3Pm5KhzXZoH1y4y4SkY9699JliCYMZOzIqj9Py8h99
1IJ0L_rUcc110DTEDpOSH7AxtVtqZnNSiqZUe6zPv.AhPxmTcFosKeW0ev3u
z4c.tknjSZ5RS68pEtj9Tl9PRIWrzUvgRz8sHLywcLBn_xz0ki89y2mZ9klk
5K96cTh.AossVZbjh5iKsWCC.iCpkc8Ix2XZ8JEHPRIATJXK6W4BQtvO036D
rYYbozeJLbbbeTCdryko1nROcwFb9q2alW6o9D2UfYBMnrdW0mxFFKThp5fS
IWmTcuo27lUmEo_7VG4fJBhNxcu.qR7ESAJBnu3STX61ExE1pbYpDdWN7UC3
RHWlt.gS2x3tz5sG_nnb4Czun5YbbfbVKNd4ylhnT8HT4VAVMo6_7jTGOgTx
.wMh5abqrWjc-
Received: from [92.20.187.109] by web121007.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP;
Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:31:03 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.118.349524
References: <1335808239.18613.YahooMailNeo@web121006.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
<CALf2ePwm9_aGngzVTKte+3_+yHF=-pcNqTAO0hmkR5rcimEX3g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1335810663.39838.YahooMailNeo@web121007.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com>
To: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net"
<bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
In-Reply-To: <CALf2ePwm9_aGngzVTKte+3_+yHF=-pcNqTAO0hmkR5rcimEX3g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust [98.138.229.81 listed in list.dnswl.org]
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(zgenjix[at]yahoo.com)
-0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
domain
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Headers-End: 1SOvNN-0002Gi-CJ
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] new bitcoin.org clients page
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com>
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 18:31:10 -0000
Are we looking at the same list? Because here is the order I added: Bitcoin=
-Qt, Armory, Electrum and MultiBit. Maybe try CTRL-F5 to force a refresh of=
your browser.=0A=0AAlso about the descriptions: yeah I know. I think it's =
better to put this up first and then have everyone submit their own descrip=
tions and screenshots. Otherwise it'll be a nightmare to coordinate until e=
verything is perfect. I did message you on IRC today but maybe you were off=
line.=0A=0AI didn't copy paste the Armory description from the website beca=
use it really sounds too spammy like a sales pitch. Here I was trying to gi=
ve an even handed balanced overview of all the clients. For each client I w=
as trying to empaphise a 'theme'. Bitcoin-Qt is stability. Armory is advanc=
ed. Electrum is convenient. MultiBit is ease of use.=0A=0A_________________=
_______________=0AFrom: Alan Reiner <etotheipi@gmail.com>=0ATo: Amir Taaki =
<zgenjix@yahoo.com> =0ACc: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net" <bit=
coin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> =0ASent: Monday, April 30, 2012 7:2=
3 PM=0ASubject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] new bitcoin.org clients page=0A=
=0A=0AHey, looks good! =A0I'm glad to see them sorted alphabetically :)=0A=
=0AA couple comments: =A0I don't think the entries for "wallet security" an=
d "backups" accurately describe Armory. =A0Wallet Security should say "Encr=
ypt/Offline" or something to to that effect -- after all, offline wallets a=
re the holy grail feature of the Armory. =A0And backups should say somethin=
g like "One-time Printable" if it fits within the box. =A0=0A=0AOtherwise, =
I really like the layout and design. =A0Although despite the fact I enjoy b=
eing first on the list, I think Bitcoin-Qt should still go first. =A0It is =
the "reference" client, and I think it's relevant that it is the "de-facto"=
client for the majority of users, and the one with the most quality contro=
l and stability.=0A=0A-Alan=0A=0A=0A=0AOn Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Ami=
r Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com> wrote:=0A=0ACheck it :) https://github.com/bitc=
oin/bitcoin.org/pull/34=0A>=0A>--------------------------------------------=
----------------------------------=0A>Live Security Virtual Conference=0A>E=
xclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and=0A>threat =
landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions=0A>will =
include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware=0A>thr=
eats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/=0A>________=
_______________________________________=0A>Bitcoin-development mailing list=
=0A>Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net=0A>https://lists.sourceforge.=
net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development=0A>
|
