summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/6d/0194d96214f8f22c57e611221030ee20379ff7
blob: 036de29aea9d2924169dc50b0f853d0b1372e52c (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <witchspace81@gmail.com>) id 1Qcudc-0002Uv-J6
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sat, 02 Jul 2011 07:29:12 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.161.175 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.161.175; envelope-from=witchspace81@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-gx0-f175.google.com; 
Received: from mail-gx0-f175.google.com ([209.85.161.175])
	by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1Qcuda-0005or-4I
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sat, 02 Jul 2011 07:29:12 +0000
Received: by gxk3 with SMTP id 3so2026764gxk.34
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Sat, 02 Jul 2011 00:29:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.151.29.18 with SMTP id g18mr3450807ybj.362.1309591744510; Sat,
	02 Jul 2011 00:29:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.151.50.21 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Jul 2011 00:29:04 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2011 07:29:04 +0000
Message-ID: <CAJNQ0stvozeQAVFkduY7Ph5EXy8ayYwiu4T+6Oz1RwjgiDnBeA@mail.gmail.com>
From: John Smith <witchspace81@gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd24af4bb79be04a7111690
X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(witchspace81[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	0.1 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in
	digit (witchspace81[at]gmail.com)
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1Qcuda-0005or-4I
Subject: [Bitcoin-development] Reconsider build system change?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 07:29:12 -0000

--000e0cd24af4bb79be04a7111690
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hello,

Why again did we choose for autotools as future build system instead of
cmake?

- CMake generates native build scripts for Make (all platforms), XCode,
Visual Studio. Autoconf only does Make.

- CMake has a clearer syntax, m4/autotools is very convoluted

- CMake is very fast

- CMake is supported natively in Qt Creator in the QT SDK, and is used by
many other KDE/QT as well as other open source applications. Many people
discourage the use of autotools for new projects.

A CMake build system for bitcoin is already integrated into rpcminer,
available here:

http://luke.dashjr.org/programs/bitcoin/w/puddinpop-bitcoin-pool.git/tree

JS

--000e0cd24af4bb79be04a7111690
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,<br><br>Why again did we choose for autotools as future build system =
instead of cmake?<br><br>- CMake generates native build scripts for Make (a=
ll platforms), XCode, Visual Studio. Autoconf only does Make.<br><br>- CMak=
e has a clearer syntax, m4/autotools is very convoluted<br>
<br>- CMake is very fast<br><br>- CMake is supported natively in Qt Creator=
 in the QT SDK, and is used by many other KDE/QT as well as other open sour=
ce applications. Many people discourage the use of autotools for new projec=
ts.<br>
<br>A CMake build system for bitcoin is already integrated into rpcminer, a=
vailable here:<br><br><a href=3D"http://luke.dashjr.org/programs/bitcoin/w/=
puddinpop-bitcoin-pool.git/tree">http://luke.dashjr.org/programs/bitcoin/w/=
puddinpop-bitcoin-pool.git/tree</a><br>
<br>JS<br>

--000e0cd24af4bb79be04a7111690--