summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/6b/a7b6e1917c3f16d8d2e278a28004b1c445d2c9
blob: e9c601658dea943310690d9380b1036211907a2a (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
Return-Path: <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66C6AD23
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sat, 23 Jan 2016 21:38:47 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-qg0-f51.google.com (mail-qg0-f51.google.com
	[209.85.192.51])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E01CE168
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sat, 23 Jan 2016 21:38:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id e32so83872676qgf.3
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sat, 23 Jan 2016 13:38:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
	:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
	bh=3Ed8HY+ZTcknOPgqmb34uVNr29Y1Whxgaa6RVu3WpUc=;
	b=T43AesVXrGuF4TQuSzLhHwC5uJndf15YmKY8Ub185ORLeWVj/wGLEt7V6s2z2NTRTN
	IZSK+iun7leQgrKf5M6uizFi3SHes7gbZPwBy4xu16DEak2QD7a8V+J1Xc5c5L7mqE+4
	AcKQudC+mrt4HH/LfcLXMW8LyQl43ZNK3nRyCDWAvkpEVDp1sGJYLQ/nxjwqQ++05jvh
	fpnzXKtx+x3SYST7sCp5b64IdhtNqaEjUdX7aM+e6R6TL1V86SJsQC69/zvbnD0BZjzO
	aZuBL78wKKoHxZ+WVEiCLZnGxix4joouvyAeTxkepdMT/Ayd0fted+a2fNE4X3yfoKQq
	sUxA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from
	:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references
	:to; bh=3Ed8HY+ZTcknOPgqmb34uVNr29Y1Whxgaa6RVu3WpUc=;
	b=R0kCQAbqmfK8ApadmCR80ClmgWyphRMibxv4HI3t4d6MhefQ4n+mG33kNCRwjtH+EX
	Qpe30eBmEhXpk6RVFx1GYPmgmuSplnobdGxXxLwsLsmJysheg3wdz3M7skbP1/S0YPbM
	VifSFBwiTCgdkuI4MarN66QmEJOcVLWZdfpDqW1HhWQU6ZwFJ5YJSiiO7ZG0VpgpUj3O
	kRUN1gGSbn4nESDgDO7Tn7guYr/YJPtn639kCFWuwrNh130Y8E7y5p278cUZycRzcNeR
	++754DsvIJWMZcYLUJiu2+xJEAGRddknZx1spGCPVneA7n36jTukHqZlYwj+FhHxkHWm
	mAow==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOR69+2mtYkucM1+dX0NhWFWlASopPPFrR7Bh6wUm+PezcDk3B3pBD+szVDZKk7cXg==
X-Received: by 10.140.102.11 with SMTP id v11mr12697445qge.39.1453585126158;
	Sat, 23 Jan 2016 13:38:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.40] (c-24-91-28-148.hsd1.ma.comcast.net.
	[24.91.28.148]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
	c190sm5672222qkb.27.2016.01.23.13.38.44
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
	Sat, 23 Jan 2016 13:38:45 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Gavin <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13C75)
In-Reply-To: <20160123205953.GA22494@muck>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 16:38:44 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3B18134A-3E3A-4A98-ADD3-9F5E8600047E@gmail.com>
References: <87si1rycux.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <2998879.R5sQRbxZRv@1337h4x0r>
	<87powvy20w.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <1736759.DT0dcscznj@1337h4x0r>
	<20160123205953.GA22494@muck>
To: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 23:23:09 +0000
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Three Month bitcoin-dev Moderation Review
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 21:38:47 -0000


> On Jan 23, 2016, at 3:59 PM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists=
.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>=20
> I would extend this to say that the technical explanation also should
> contribute uniquely to the conversation; a +1 with an explanation
> the last +1 gave isn't useful.

Yes, comments should contribute to the discussion, with either technical dis=
cussion or additional relevant data. I think a +1 like the following should b=
e encouraged:

"+1: we had eleven customer support tickets in just the last week that would=
 have been prevented if XYZ.

Jane Doe, CTO CoinBitChainBasely.com"