1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
|
Return-Path: <karra.etc@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA5364A4
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:02:49 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pd0-f172.google.com (mail-pd0-f172.google.com
[209.85.192.172])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB74E1A5
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:02:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pdbnt7 with SMTP id nt7so70518240pdb.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:02:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=1TBZ0reGmW+psHcdy5yUeqAJvwd4XkFuD+tzDg8TVos=;
b=j8KksSt44UMspCMWtRb1/e80ZZekAj1MPtPsVBkcPEnSF+JSniooKG350oFDPgXlYa
aywOBh7uazl0/p8JqjVBk5fClKRaN4Q5VEpSaCTMLDK8s6AMIzzGPWD5vHrOML/ZnpNr
+Csv6X/t6OmW8tt14IrIb3bN+NZOKR8uiyHvDntya2vjIAIUAGLfxthOxkdd0LMPw7mV
KyN0WV7gXeiGTPZPCG7HlrMgXCyVjCeGThPdw9j8sj6eKhONITMbiheIqfnw9wIy2gCe
wDDXBjm8DMiL6p5Sd0XfzSY1GliLY7uP4lcO/96iWL4LTWTS/T7J20B31jRYalBVbBuM
r7Mg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.70.1.102 with SMTP id 6mr7933788pdl.32.1437584569296; Wed,
22 Jul 2015 10:02:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.83.7 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:02:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20150721135846.GB13429@savin.petertodd.org>
References: <CADm_WcZKoMAhYvXbFMbE+5K9HOD75YkQu8_qTW4S6YN6ZMrfjA@mail.gmail.com>
<55A9421B.6040605@jrn.me.uk> <55AC29DB.4060800@jrn.me.uk>
<CABm2gDr6qXzvcpX_To39kCEsnQNTQS4M5Y40Yk_Lw481rjvSag@mail.gmail.com>
<20150721130412.GA4551@savin.petertodd.org>
<20150721135846.GB13429@savin.petertodd.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 22:32:49 +0530
Message-ID: <CAFkt3UONhyEuKHZOVwk6URQVSeseN6RXsYBNK8gUcXeraE62Jg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Sriram Karra <karra.etc@gmail.com>
To: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b6d7d84966d35051b79bd5d
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP 102 - kick the can down the road to 2MB
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:02:50 -0000
--047d7b6d7d84966d35051b79bd5d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 7:28 PM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> I personally *don't* think he's doing that, rather I believe he knows
> full well it's a bad patch and is proposing it because he wants to push
> discussion towards a solution. Often trolling the a audience with bad
> patches is an effective way to motivate people to respond by writing
> better ones; Jeff has told me he often does exactly that.
>
> I think in this case we shouldn't do anything, so short-circuiting that
> process by pointing out what he's doing publicly makes sense.
>
Assuming that's what Jeff is doing, how does preventing better solutions
from emerging 'make sense'?
--047d7b6d7d84966d35051b79bd5d
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">=
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 7:28 PM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev <span dir=3D"lt=
r"><<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_=
blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><div>=
=C2=A0</div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;bo=
rder-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
I personally *don't* think he's doing that, rather I believe he kno=
ws<br>
full well it's a bad patch and is proposing it because he wants to push=
<br>
discussion towards a solution. Often trolling the a audience with bad<br>
patches is an effective way to motivate people to respond by writing<br>
better ones; Jeff has told me he often does exactly that.<br>
<br>
I think in this case we shouldn't do anything, so short-circuiting that=
<br>
process by pointing out what he's doing publicly makes sense.<br></bloc=
kquote><div><br></div><div>Assuming that's what Jeff is doing, how does=
preventing better solutions from emerging 'make sense'?<br></div><=
/div></div></div>
--047d7b6d7d84966d35051b79bd5d--
|
