summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/6a/3035549b697e8dacbe2f212beb2bba0611067d
blob: 04e8a986fe1800c3c31222a82ebcaa4936c33a9b (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
Return-Path: <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8963493D
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sun, 16 Oct 2016 16:36:00 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-qk0-f173.google.com (mail-qk0-f173.google.com
	[209.85.220.173])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0351A7
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sun, 16 Oct 2016 16:35:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qk0-f173.google.com with SMTP id z190so201056772qkc.2
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sun, 16 Oct 2016 09:35:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
	:cc; bh=ck3jEsK29zbVn5ikbJxUuAO5ZdMJcGAbWL9Ord5/aoQ=;
	b=TU/m5X3suSHBMslk9MJkb2mBnCKDE9x3xYrd3TQRHkw+WiMQrEcfn/JGefY90t74ZY
	1+HOApGLSv81Dx4mndEXwlB2tXFyIxUbD/7p8CxmL2RHrfCQjf1GsraNBIlXXR7B9J/t
	wri6rhy3O0pfoGDj8gOlC9D/g3954lG+RGrddex+fzPaqEsDmmyyTByBPpnb7Hwd24nO
	IexfveJ8UciknUFyjLl0fNBF+OBZcss69YaqA7puGY55EfHCr6fqkXhuGacP4Dv2EczG
	I1MIphO1LOxle6QNFKUlhi7ecWhRKnKPajgq3Sj5Bl+JcRtowMxLxhBh+4myLw/Y2eEA
	iSow==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to:cc;
	bh=ck3jEsK29zbVn5ikbJxUuAO5ZdMJcGAbWL9Ord5/aoQ=;
	b=lq3qy5mN4hvu5mpkxOHH4iCboojyu+j+8Qp8jV5SH1VlIPvovKW1Dq90p9c0fdbUam
	BYhyU+3D98ZDp49BlrGsGv/sfiOdjuhV43mutkQygbRIHajLXrJ5fRs1+RnVMBbQcIt1
	ysJ4zPTN10tTP96dtMZE+8oG3JBsm1KC3N9fATzcSGxntpv7tYY0lPnL7MSLA8w1adkK
	jNI5GeQ3rKEOp6lgRL4c16qcppWmBMqaE2htlo/8oYezg/QvwQP8yOrNG7CIoO2rE9Lf
	WPQ9r8C7FedCF4dcXe7K4iLTps1sE6Ia38c5KjM1UJ8KpE7fVHfSZ0wO2AiCntjW2qNp
	/1hw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RnHeodj2bWMTOVX0dpsJd4htOCSaW/Ks8LMRxqVVLu/U1paFVVmF/jL+9hU/LpCQDPpo1YQ6H0fEgJX/g==
X-Received: by 10.233.237.145 with SMTP id c139mr19375075qkg.29.1476635759210; 
	Sun, 16 Oct 2016 09:35:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.200.53.184 with HTTP; Sun, 16 Oct 2016 09:35:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1782741.nelbyupFSb@strawberry>
References: <CAPg+sBjdyJ297-GZvVc-wQwCEX-cRAGTNWDd92SgVzdCcD_ZMw@mail.gmail.com>
	<1782741.nelbyupFSb@strawberry>
From: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2016 12:35:58 -0400
Message-ID: <CABsx9T2sWKFKpRYsjcgcdef+nL7X9-4+3H10hAy1FsXaax38Og@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tom Zander <tomz@freedommail.ch>, 
	Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c0970d8e3f70e053efe0d63
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, 
	RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 16 Oct 2016 16:36:38 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Start time for BIP141 (segwit)
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2016 16:36:00 -0000

--94eb2c0970d8e3f70e053efe0d63
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Tom Zander via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> The fallow period sounds waaaay to short. I suggest 2 months at minimum
> since anyone that wants to be safe needs to upgrade.
>

I asked a lot of businesses and individuals how long it would take them to
upgrade to a new release over the last year or two.

Nobody said it would take them more than two weeks.

If somebody is running their own validation code... then we should assume
they're sophisticated enough to figure out how to mitigate any risks
associated with segwit activation on their own.

-- 
--
Gavin Andresen

--94eb2c0970d8e3f70e053efe0d63
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On S=
un, Oct 16, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Tom Zander via bitcoin-dev <span dir=3D"ltr">=
&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_bla=
nk">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockqu=
ote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc s=
olid;padding-left:1ex"><div id=3D":14l" class=3D"a3s aXjCH m157ce0b7f332af1=
6">The fallow period sounds waaaay to short. I suggest 2 months at minimum<=
br>
since anyone that wants to be safe needs to upgrade.</div></blockquote></di=
v><br>I asked a lot of businesses and individuals how long it would take th=
em to upgrade to a new release over the last year or two.</div><div class=
=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">Nobody said it would =
take them more than two weeks.</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div><d=
iv class=3D"gmail_extra">If somebody is running their own validation code..=
. then we should assume they&#39;re sophisticated enough to figure out how =
to mitigate any risks associated with segwit activation on their own.<br><d=
iv><br></div>-- <br><div class=3D"gmail_signature" data-smartmail=3D"gmail_=
signature"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div>--<br>Gavin Andresen</div=
><div><br></div></div></div></div>
</div></div>

--94eb2c0970d8e3f70e053efe0d63--