1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
|
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <mark@monetize.io>) id 1WXDKD-0006UN-5P
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 07 Apr 2014 17:27:13 +0000
Received: from mail-pb0-f49.google.com ([209.85.160.49])
by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1WXDKC-0000mI-33
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 07 Apr 2014 17:27:13 +0000
Received: by mail-pb0-f49.google.com with SMTP id jt11so7021796pbb.36
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Mon, 07 Apr 2014 10:27:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent
:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=qaiT+a+SWsLbF5Z6d2HAdeefZ/QWXH17eyNh4L7NXkU=;
b=fQYkpYaGJ8Ix9rYiq5DwS1Ku2DwQpV7+KEoOX77qPM29OjYHZ/Xb+fSlPJBj4PZdsc
3Ju01w1mj9V33kuGkfTYQxgPk9gX84Zxi3s/+dAzQNSJaFxFD73J6mHYxYBAoq4TiJXo
6eDXUAJPkJLNeWh7FynSkMTy2GYgrFU8JJtQ155DiR/2i98Aa/W5yswvxeEM8glhQjlN
RbRbUHYkDkMl2oy6zX6H8hkP7l0TECgmGDS35Ro/jLvlIG4QjWg7t/K+rLh7WuZ3kaGQ
tiHZPoKEl2GqWLHgz9G6E0kEof/BXbXcxE9llM8lXi9wie4BckrqzLzKpEuPQEsTCEqi
+TFA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnWUB6zmhE+ZCCYrbGNIhgZ/9t7NZIdn+Ijj3PDOOB3XXTZFs0dJAAkXvcelOIbf5rT4ock
X-Received: by 10.67.15.42 with SMTP id fl10mr1119267pad.30.1396890113337;
Mon, 07 Apr 2014 10:01:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.127.194] (50-0-36-93.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net.
[50.0.36.93]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
xk3sm37942498pbb.65.2014.04.07.10.01.47 for <multiple recipients>
(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Mon, 07 Apr 2014 10:01:52 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5342D9FA.8080102@monetize.io>
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 10:01:46 -0700
From: Mark Friedenbach <mark@monetize.io>
Organization: Monetize.io Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
References: <CANEZrP2rgiQHpekEpFviJ22QsiV+s-F2pqosaZOA5WrRtJx5pg@mail.gmail.com> <5342C833.5030906@gmail.com> <CAAS2fgTqBfEPXh2dfcL_ke6c0wfXw4qUM1rAYMkAHcAM6mYH+g@mail.gmail.com> <5342D1DB.8060203@monetize.io>
<CAAS2fgRu-0C_ozaN0qSc9SvF2TpZ56NwceLCrfQjikuQgc85tQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgRu-0C_ozaN0qSc9SvF2TpZ56NwceLCrfQjikuQgc85tQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
X-Headers-End: 1WXDKC-0000mI-33
Cc: Bitcoin Development <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Why are we bleeding nodes?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 17:27:13 -0000
On 04/07/2014 09:57 AM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> That is an implementation issue— mostly one that arises as an indirect
> consequence of not having headers first and the parallel fetch, not a
> requirements issue.
Oh, absolutely. But the question "why are people not running full
nodes?" has to do with the current implementation, not abstract
capabilities of a future version of the bitcoind code base.
|
