1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
|
Return-Path: <elombrozo@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44B52902
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 8 Jan 2017 00:28:36 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-yw0-f171.google.com (mail-yw0-f171.google.com
[209.85.161.171])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E765C14C
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 8 Jan 2017 00:28:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-yw0-f171.google.com with SMTP id r204so399525629ywb.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 07 Jan 2017 16:28:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=+p4jpI01vG8s2HirybUR5qsCLdGhVPrHXQY/adm19LU=;
b=RfSGSZk5pHUKAdqoRwuuWKH2V+g7/FY5wWmOZuQ3ajexuq4yLufkzjAwtHq0pB9SoU
T6aUoBasSxm1IsmL2oV7jApD3Jd+ceX5BoACNjQXgvTtAmG1cmVza8QdWjSXQOdG7slH
QFFJymfjU8/kEkoVPU+k5AIKXaFUjQnotS+27nnJQzGzemsb8XqcPW9hzR8SHTJ4MIDz
ZvV8UO5WvxhzJToV0dJ/oP/PQML8Djn+MGkHbZDw6byUbYHM3PozVP7q9BYjO2k3A3LL
qoH1CogGSk36fk40wbHdJ/z/yim1hxe1+jrcyZy54TWxUg5/ZBJxW4x+urPiFFYA3Zi7
Q+3A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=+p4jpI01vG8s2HirybUR5qsCLdGhVPrHXQY/adm19LU=;
b=aMRGD8RoKXv+fH6UIFOOV8dl3l5rTWEdsR2orxn7DZeS0Gwx7lrD/wkOm1SmwFkM3o
CIcywHienfV4/6a0q+eu4kGlJ53G8F1sJU5mzES8uSmrqhGIRJ5cI9c9Gc4gFYNA1R3B
wnVFbfTWnbR1md3jgObJkCJL2FsB0u3ylQ2nhARvuytP/r8vXTglKbIvdgA7oNxBSAx1
y4Ykmf6uNXc7uCPMnyBZGsmdckuRcpCHwJHcJtv5ZV13EsiQSOSGATv398UeV1wkgN8S
BShGvdG9neEQfy0prOvL/So0/4+kgHS7GMkWGbQsMc7vdu3Fl5Kk5dAHbIzTuZxzPgz7
wB0w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLLoRuRc7Vqa8DzyPLS84GOyEZnrVi044T1N5rQLGvKm/JO9XTP5BcbrbH7Bdoy2a+Yv/s+Zz5BAyAo2A==
X-Received: by 10.129.173.93 with SMTP id l29mr78324150ywk.351.1483835315217;
Sat, 07 Jan 2017 16:28:35 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.109.138 with HTTP; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 16:28:34 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <c582369c-5463-611b-1c32-6348bdfb4a9e@voskuil.org>
References: <7169224.bI6Cz5OEL8@cherry>
<CABr1YTfc0BZ21-mwMohqo8_v8D1QnYiGB_SMeCLwFChY2MV_zA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAcC9ysBJcSyMoTAuyFL+1D4m=-LZOgQF_pb4AFC5vpv-yMAHQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFVRnyqw2w1rHN=ShLBsadB3henEM9BZxxdXj+4QY6NQAyZ4Fg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAcC9ysNPC1nHumY4giCi7ffVRviNZBNfoLdS0UsghSX8NRcmw@mail.gmail.com>
<dd5072fe-be5b-52a6-7171-ed320c851f6f@gmail.com>
<c582369c-5463-611b-1c32-6348bdfb4a9e@voskuil.org>
From: Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2017 16:28:34 -0800
Message-ID: <CABr1YTfRDUQNivebMvsONV0na7j_sEyw3gii+5r4v8txu+O68w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric Voskuil <eric@voskuil.org>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f403045e8a1ade6b0405458a54a0
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Classic 1.2.0 released
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2017 00:28:36 -0000
--f403045e8a1ade6b0405458a54a0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Can you guys please take this discussion elsewhere? Perhaps to
bitcoin-discuss? This is not the place to rehash discussions that have
taken place a million times already. The behavior of the network under
contentious hard forks has been discussed ad nauseum. This mailing list is
for the discussion of new ideas and proposals.
Much appreciated. Thanks.
On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Eric Voskuil via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On 01/07/2017 03:10 PM, Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > Still wondering why you guys don't care about the ridiculous number of
> > full nodes, no incentive to run one and what would happen if someone
> > were to control a majority of full nodes
>
> The level of control over a majority of full nodes is irrelevant. If
> this was truly a measure of control over Bitcoin someone would simply
> spin up a bunch of nodes and take control at trivial cost.
>
> e
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
>
--f403045e8a1ade6b0405458a54a0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">Can you guys please take this discussion elsewhere? Perhap=
s to bitcoin-discuss? This is not the place to rehash discussions that have=
taken place a million times already. The behavior of the network under con=
tentious hard forks has been discussed ad nauseum. This mailing list is for=
the discussion of new ideas and proposals.<div><br></div><div>Much appreci=
ated. Thanks.</div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail=
_quote">On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Eric Voskuil via bitcoin-dev <span =
dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" ta=
rget=3D"_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>></span> wrote:=
<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-lef=
t:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=3D"">On 01/07/2017 03:10 PM,=
Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev wrote:<br>
> Still wondering why you guys don't care about the ridiculous numbe=
r of<br>
> full nodes, no incentive to run one and what would happen if someone<b=
r>
> were to control a majority of full nodes<br>
<br>
</span>The level of control over a majority of full nodes is irrelevant. If=
<br>
this was truly a measure of control over Bitcoin someone would simply<br>
spin up a bunch of nodes and take control at trivial cost.<br>
<br>
e<br>
<br>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.=
<wbr>linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.<wbr>org=
/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-<wbr>dev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
--f403045e8a1ade6b0405458a54a0--
|
