1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
|
Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::136])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5F69C002B
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 18 Feb 2023 00:03:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99F4960672
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 18 Feb 2023 00:03:23 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 99F4960672
Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key,
unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com
header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm1 header.b=thxUpWdd
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.602
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id XSE1YXpXOOI9
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 18 Feb 2023 00:03:22 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 2C098600B3
Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com
[64.147.123.19])
by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C098600B3
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 18 Feb 2023 00:03:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46])
by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB684320092E;
Fri, 17 Feb 2023 19:03:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162])
by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 17 Feb 2023 19:03:21 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type
:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to
:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender
:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender
:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1676678600; x=1676765000; bh=f
FRN0edri6e20LsHcDGrhln2CEW8G7ee7dtP74fCjDk=; b=thxUpWddY5uJetXi9
CHRz4m6iOu1fneWP+/V5JxXU65USte0QgJci2JP3c1QIrBQ7XFBXQyZgY96Jmmu4
u+PO4VmME0P7S7yBggCACA7G3u8KPsLIyrzVNGaCg18r+F1Gzsrb3P8GO9+M/H1W
1Wc2ZLyh9f5+yNukdQlEnugNMQTzy/JKgwYbsuU2nvF6Vm5w4Zt5x14MwoRe3OBc
x8AlR/lCffNp3a2f61wOyhzsNUk9NftjKjJoECVtLtJIIUWplWmWUvZcV1RENvs6
TrGrOc24f9f1d+w2leAJL3aX5Uuqt9tyIii+SMttfhsK1R1LMlAzyY15uRwqYAVw
Q+Alw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:yBXwY0qyW8LFf9wixsnjPYLWCG2WRfU3Ajkif0InChCHOAw0l7thCA>
<xme:yBXwY6qBZ_Pn6AQuNqhyo64w2Fwxqnm40E_VK5YTtFcLeujurhlTWBE9M2rIHQKEc
6F92wB-tGS2EoTCjrY>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:yBXwY5NJqY0v_KAVIIeAq3m_YW5Gy3GxC0u6xPUvH2WIQrenbfZAlYINhn7Zj6em>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrudejtddgudehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf
fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen
uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne
cujfgurhepfffhvffufggjfhfkgggtgfesthhqmhdttderjeenucfhrhhomheprfgvthgv
rhcuvfhougguuceophgvthgvsehpvghtvghrthhouggurdhorhhgqeenucggtffrrghtth
gvrhhnpefhteeuleffvddujeejteejjefgjeefleeiieejudeiiedvueegffefueeglefg
ueenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehpvg
htvgesphgvthgvrhhtohguugdrohhrgh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:yBXwY77RlfsVjMzbMPSeoIWIeTV3rqK4PXwH5hOvOV-WmQzCoIbzlA>
<xmx:yBXwYz7GphRO5agxD7g3owoXBCuPSIPyMdZy5d1Snx2KXaq_sVjylA>
<xmx:yBXwY7i4LKfMUmUlsC1CPfmJq6cZPrdIgxkLXucWlD3JUvQU7Q995A>
<xmx:yBXwY230WMGLBELCNWD3p9TNsKY2zI5_h_kvmkb_lJ3NR-MGEAwj_Q>
Feedback-ID: i525146e8:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri,
17 Feb 2023 19:03:19 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2023 02:03:15 +0200
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Andrew Poelstra <apoelstra@wpsoftware.net>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Poelstra via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
vjudeu@gazeta.pl
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <Y/APRs3IPYapIpGg@camus>
References: <TG0yVn41L6VFOHFRYqd3iGz7mxHWtjFdaBrz8mlP6Uk8bmog_isDbtq_2QyvdUs9_Q-jStmx7V7l5rAesXDfHlK9Ehft7SkK5EWQ_3mg-eQ=@protonmail.com>
<177016307-23dca06637e70217317077657442d0d8@pmq7v.m5r2.onet>
<Y/APRs3IPYapIpGg@camus>
Message-ID: <B837E586-894E-40E8-9814-385EF59402B6@petertodd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Testing censorship resistance of bitcoin p2p
network
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2023 00:03:23 -0000
On February 18, 2023 1:35:34 AM GMT+02:00, Andrew Poelstra via bitcoin-dev=
=20
>You could try statically analyze `<anything>` to determine whether the
>IF branch could ever be taken=2E For example there is no path through
>the "inscription script" that would result in all the crap being dropped
>by the end of the script, violating the CLEANSTACK rule=2E
>
>This sort of filtering, assuming it could be reliably and efficiently
>done, would at least force inscription scripts to be "plausible", and
>would greatly increase their space cost by e=2Eg=2E requiring OP_DROP to =
be
>added somewhere hundreds of times=2E
"greatly increase their space cost"?
Tell me, what is the actual % increase to adding OP_DROPs like you propose=
?
|
