1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
|
Return-Path: <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9BCE722
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 7 Jul 2017 23:38:07 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-vk0-f50.google.com (mail-vk0-f50.google.com
[209.85.213.50])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D49517C
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 7 Jul 2017 23:38:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vk0-f50.google.com with SMTP id r125so25475743vkf.1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 07 Jul 2017 16:38:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
:subject:to:cc;
bh=UF2sfqkTNLwriS2rgw+WXM0bV+EDYm8XcPUkFLup0Fs=;
b=KtZo7U4iZWeddWw4S1r2drN7QJCj9k4rf2FTRooVrwbWPNWnQX7J6EEYV1QSQqWTG+
8zD0KjRhxQelpnBZAxeyqAVRiJ7w9bBplyoSFdpf3N9+0MrOMsFJFfW34gd4kQijB3JM
z4obB51zCWPtGwXqoof/dsJ18lVT4z+InoOfTm34Avid7ulLJSxXbcwD2Ue7aAKzHGA1
PTPJ22k1PV/yh18Kqlc7X/U2FKacRHabihjIWap7i4GldevN0Vdqrzjb2gkxK3As4pEX
HoTWQJkLWuLWMwhCn76D+aq/ahi7jVsjx7Ukl0i3yBlFvWKLUt+1e1AIOEXsvMGDZOyr
m9Og==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from
:date:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=UF2sfqkTNLwriS2rgw+WXM0bV+EDYm8XcPUkFLup0Fs=;
b=MWMYBZbDhn4LMChqDzIbPQ+FNtZImKb2V10SW11CCMIFgDGPnfcfjODinzfu9u5OEi
Gp6UmKu/ib4sGJgx8CIJgZYDGAJfJ/sqSmOpwgQWNuK5qe4HpEFxAgIq4GrYDjT+KSRW
wic47Y+NHvhGJWDuWQHsxAreC0YTUZm5DTMSSZJhZHq4R9U0l+RINFKeeOABuGkVCbFu
bbl+XyEU5fa/BPs40v3kWsSn5bCz9MmwVdQhIXXmNDdzKCyRyPJSamQqDumY5CqfA6Z5
HRXGPD4J3ceBxfe1UcsXuNzdfy6Gf7CRhW9yviy2qUHLvER9o2tWvzL1lm4ckncZd7Nj
ggKA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw113HY7hTWKOi050wL3jxnV4TUPnLNzuYJVP/0buw7Uwtjrrn+REP
Hop4AtH2i69UYmi1xZT0VJ6YBf20HQ==
X-Received: by 10.31.110.71 with SMTP id j68mr1940290vkc.72.1499470686486;
Fri, 07 Jul 2017 16:38:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: gmaxwell@gmail.com
Received: by 10.103.40.2 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Jul 2017 16:38:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201707072327.15901.luke@dashjr.org>
References: <CAKzdR-qCmuj02yobAj9YDYq7Ed309z2VUaMtbL_i9vF3zkp5mw@mail.gmail.com>
<201707072327.15901.luke@dashjr.org>
From: Gregory Maxwell <greg@xiph.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 23:38:06 +0000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 05JxQMq3ehv-FqqjO2UMWanOLxw
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgSLmVTB8aMU375YJsfr0LuPkg28X6NJ8e5vVZmyTwyvmQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] A Segwit2x BIP
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2017 23:38:07 -0000
On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 11:27 PM, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Larger block sizes is not likely to have a meaningful impact on fee pressure.
> Any expectations that do not match the reality are merely misguided, and
> should not be a basis for changing Bitcoin.
I think it's very clear that they will in the very short term
(https://anduck.net/bitcoin/fees/4320_blocks.php note the rate drops
when demand falls below supply). But I agree with you if you mean a
somewhat longer term e.g. a year out.
|
