1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
|
Return-Path: <user@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::138])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC32DC0012;
Thu, 9 Dec 2021 10:23:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB22882C3B;
Thu, 9 Dec 2021 10:23:04 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org (amavisd-new);
dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)"
header.d=petertodd.org
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id NiMVK7pARYqI; Thu, 9 Dec 2021 10:23:03 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: delayed 00:15:15 by SQLgrey-1.8.0
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from outmail148102.authsmtp.net (outmail148102.authsmtp.net
[62.13.148.102])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2094A82AEF;
Thu, 9 Dec 2021 10:23:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-c237.authsmtp.com (mail-c237.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.237])
by punt17.authsmtp.com. (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 1B9A7jqQ077285;
Thu, 9 Dec 2021 10:07:45 GMT (envelope-from user@petertodd.org)
Received: from petertodd.org (76-10-157-59.dsl.teksavvy.com [76.10.157.59])
(authenticated bits=0)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 1B9A7hoR024327
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO);
Thu, 9 Dec 2021 10:07:44 GMT (envelope-from user@petertodd.org)
Received: by petertodd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E008F9E4EE;
Thu, 9 Dec 2021 05:07:41 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=petertodd.org; s=mail;
t=1639044462; bh=u0bRM8IjH0r0NDbRISdDDKgkJxhEOfkAOqW/7MJe4TM=;
h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From;
b=ig//lvRO4Ly9Z9btipUOdLYJ9YD62XJ8kslmRlyN9GDQtHTBv24dhqr4k/vPjLpbn
tRmHHY1RMEkIKW1i10IArm3kkN0TrM21muW8Mr3NkEJUo7K1v9wHAaF0v3TSSUTAbU
587qsm07D+uykRshz1eZh0Jj374e5UNOpdc3orAOcRoLf4vDz8rTYi6lprL4t18yhj
+Jw3Pw++YoT6977n8HjIr5FiGR/HcmJkpQU9ovpASsG/3Gekrh32UUwWzKfUdleBW0
9d9F4UX5AA96EPG75v+7T2WlFrVIP+YDkdmT8SOpMkBWN647Wm22fO8Z8ouCA9+cnn
ZvEbyDWRaCzAw==
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id F3DC55FB4A; Thu, 9 Dec 2021 05:07:37 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 05:07:37 -0500
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Christian Moss <chrismoss411@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <YbHVaU19CFvOQ3MB@petertodd.org>
References: <DD7D5A8B-F61F-4302-ACF4-CE731843D97D@gmail.com>
<CALL-=e5mF9TqbbD=Cf-bawbw4dq2PGjC9W_nqAQeHsB829ZpNg@mail.gmail.com>
<CALkkCJas_pf7Un45CJyFg8j9cBk8PtKN4iYAL81TtLSRNnKqeg@mail.gmail.com>
<CANQKmgLyaYAjL_=LziTCFT=Ahc2SXjJrWc+RO59pxd3mnJApfQ@mail.gmail.com>
<YbHImwix1z8BgAc2@petertodd.org>
<CANQKmg+D22GrLFDBAawop1uha3GG5F4TmixMajcTPQUdTF4-PQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GdjUhLDGsLfybwJA"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CANQKmg+D22GrLFDBAawop1uha3GG5F4TmixMajcTPQUdTF4-PQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Server-Quench: da6ffe79-58d7-11ec-ba2e-8434971169dc
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZIVwkA IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
bwdMdgsUHFAXAgsB AWcbWlReUFp7XWc7 bAxPbAVDY09JQQBj T0pMXVMcFXdhcBtZ
WXweUB1xdQIIeXZ1 YEMsCiFdChIvck9g R0YAEnAHZDIzdTJO UhVFfwdXdApNfx5D
YwQsGhFYa3VsNCMk FAgyOXU9MCtqYBdx Qw4NMVQTR0lOEjMi clg5EDMjHEsKDwIL
GCYLFmMmOg4PM0x6 G1o9UlUZNX1aLgxR H11LASlWTwAI
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1024:7600
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 76.10.157.59/25
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
=?iso-8859-1?Q?H=E9ctor_Jos=E9_C=E1rdenas?= Pacheco <hcarpach@gmail.com>,
lightning-dev <lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] Sending OP_RETURN via Bitcoin
Lightning
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2021 10:23:05 -0000
--GdjUhLDGsLfybwJA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 09:49:11AM +0000, Christian Moss wrote:
> pete@petertodd.org, so single use seals require an onchain transaction to
> post the proof of publication to the ledger (assuming bitcoin is used as
> the ledger) when an asset is transferred, but it can scale because you can
> batch many proofs (transfer of ownerships) into a merkle tree and just add
> the merkle root into the single tx going into the ledger?
Exactly. And since the aggregation is trustless with respect to validity, u=
sers
can choose what kind of censorship risk they're willing to take (as well as
mitigate it with "multisig" schemes that use multiple aggregators in parall=
el).
--=20
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
--GdjUhLDGsLfybwJA
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=KoPi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--GdjUhLDGsLfybwJA--
|
