1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
|
Return-Path: <rgrant@rgrant.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19548D8D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 5 Feb 2018 15:56:57 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-lf0-f50.google.com (mail-lf0-f50.google.com
[209.85.215.50])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49B172F6
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 5 Feb 2018 15:56:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-lf0-f50.google.com with SMTP id w27so42431087lfd.6
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 05 Feb 2018 07:56:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=rgrant-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
:subject:to; bh=bwfRdYjaANlofpWIKfmEE3KBmksw9+TT0AEBavnPhY0=;
b=Yz22F9pZs34WqhNPLqeQMvvtxD3oYtzsknpSgJRiUpmuVKvXLlLs6W1Z9koi4M5sWI
MiJXZK6nzwSJpeKnhA33O6zNTvHExozllN9tw0qqStHS3MWgIcuf+1l0ACqOHK3nu350
pnb6kcjUub79KS5ZcKB7u0lcEFRdIOUVQ7YKLJq5XC6+u3RYQgUskArhZrwHbplfEPRo
ze1U33TlttllEQvMYJMIMjWeLQuz9h8/qes83q9P2HQTZ/efW+QwNi+2zr923C66NK+v
mwKvnar8BLVGZAi6/MGrq9l7ofCLtsJjTxe27SWBX1Bb8oWLwxV0jJOjHTxwZ6MsrTSi
0NtQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from
:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=bwfRdYjaANlofpWIKfmEE3KBmksw9+TT0AEBavnPhY0=;
b=s8AcCAoChJGizEMm6HAABLLxVGECXGm/2tIUkmn7M8ohj+YLHCUt03rTEIrEWHj+Bp
Xt3QTwLE16bzoDwloy98TnyN2cGLyPzhQzVdlBIimaWlufYN1G6JhiI+95WeSYH0gQ+J
1tjQjyzIhzodxSUuofJh6e1QwLJRjuQSEbuf6HXwGq8ReNDPqievOiV3lRjX3UtlktM4
at+/zr7mwwxZfTsw4vIcwB4pjsGmM06Ky1U7xxxm75pKfEHZv0hp5LT2dT2CFmC0GbvN
TRc4nYWZG40Sfxe0HVZ2ASVMa2zLPNJTuvDAft79bqegddiyscFerja0mSboSztvS2se
p2dg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytfw7Ym4VIkRXf4nKF0i/nATJkd8LTW8SlVs+AhPlSzfgKGRwG9C
XoRgiZR+CHN2WhIehZCeY6lSHBhwy2KWA+OQsp5qrblyeRg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x224Q4uGG1J7uRPWemkPoPamh+70WLKFFelUbfYx75R7Fx757zUOyFUjY5404A2+KPdxFPzHPJi05Su0Z8IdC0IA=
X-Received: by 10.25.228.13 with SMTP id b13mr31258074lfh.61.1517846214631;
Mon, 05 Feb 2018 07:56:54 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: rgrant@rgrant.org
Received: by 10.25.79.80 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 07:56:23 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgSnfd++94+40vnSRxQfi9fk8N6+2-DbjVpssHxFvYveFQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAS2fgSnfd++94+40vnSRxQfi9fk8N6+2-DbjVpssHxFvYveFQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ryan Grant <bitcoin-dev@rgrant.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 10:56:23 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: _ZARRPfCayak3u2oGTbo9hwbsW0
Message-ID: <CAMnpzfphzviN9CqZaFa3P-U2OnHn56LYEtWtMktT1D37bPqvcQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gregory Maxwell <greg@xiph.org>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Graftroot: Private and efficient surrogate
scripts under the taproot assumption
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 15:56:57 -0000
Am I reading correctly that this allows unilateral key rotation (to a
previously unknown key), without invalidating the interests of other
parties in the existing multisig (or even requiring any on-chain
transaction), at the cost of storing the signed delegation?
|
