1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
|
Return-Path: <simon@bitcartel.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 652BEC29
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 25 Aug 2015 21:18:24 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pa0-f50.google.com (mail-pa0-f50.google.com
[209.85.220.50])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F12BC1B5
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 25 Aug 2015 21:18:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pacdd16 with SMTP id dd16so135830896pac.2
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 25 Aug 2015 14:18:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to
:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=wakd5VAS3XATjdrVjBt5FGfB2LrAI4l6P+7mh+Kt+sY=;
b=DMK4fVUwfcpAkLNz4UZ9RyWED8i08OJorlPH8zmmMLt1zGtrCC8Pzln4KKf0Pcy96/
oNcpGifOU99zpjt+zQFv/9JGIYde/ekFK4c7ZsX9BUEVC4VI9DRJNy6pDqX5pkYjaUMz
HjB9FsxS88POkqt307SU9MYg9NT5NWvxuN0owhGH0c80SuzaQquz5E5S4nasAhvoAYgq
UsHeeFtl7+dC32XuSiVTqRAg1+BKNzLbTrtTzBgxxpkvoa+/KcpmBDLvK28goVEr25F+
AHPxkggo5ikLthlBbLKEp3oX32/j+nAMf/i7SOj9Xayzx5LRHUt0lstK3Fwv674jMplg
GXkg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnRTOOydocFwn89Q2u7rvskTQD5rXKmw+sK3SF/earGFmzBRxkWlridGY5IG0NNzl5+lMFe
X-Received: by 10.66.248.72 with SMTP id yk8mr59609709pac.112.1440537503686;
Tue, 25 Aug 2015 14:18:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.18] (c-24-5-43-190.hsd1.ca.comcast.net.
[24.5.43.190]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id
ft7sm22149419pdb.58.2015.08.25.14.18.16
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Tue, 25 Aug 2015 14:18:17 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <55DCDB98.80004@bitcartel.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 14:18:16 -0700
From: Simon Liu <simon@bitcartel.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>,
Matt Whitlock <bip@mattwhitlock.name>
References: <CAED3CWipF8u5g3LUrqfyHxvEk4Lu+d12ZOJZnoBUw6iZZOg-ZQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAFzgq-x9GBbqARyhMgfSPc=wYeBgzXy4VUQ0D76GC+TCAxWDuA@mail.gmail.com> <20150825201643.GC11083@muck>
<1489961.GhSFCGzPRJ@crushinator> <20150825203744.GB3464@muck>
In-Reply-To: <20150825203744.GB3464@muck>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org, greg@xiph.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Dynamically Controlled Bitcoin Block Size Max Cap
[BIP 1xx - Draft]
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 21:18:24 -0000
I don't think this would work.
If the rule is that one user can only have one vote, how do you prevent
a user running multiple nodes?
Also, how do you verify that a node is indeed a fully validating node
with its own copy of the blockchain?
On 08/25/2015 01:37 PM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>
> An interesting idea would be to design a voting mechanism such that only
> users with access to validating nodes be able to vote - a fundemental
> requirement for users to fully participate in Bitcoin's goverance.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
|
