1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
|
Return-Path: <aymeric@peersm.com>
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 070C4C002B
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 28 Jan 2023 16:53:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D56C381E58
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 28 Jan 2023 16:53:22 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org D56C381E58
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id FqgkJNjnbAbM
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 28 Jan 2023 16:53:21 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 29DAA81E56
Received: from 5.mo552.mail-out.ovh.net (5.mo552.mail-out.ovh.net
[188.165.45.220])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29DAA81E56
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 28 Jan 2023 16:53:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mxplan6.mail.ovh.net (unknown [10.108.20.191])
by mo552.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6950629B37;
Sat, 28 Jan 2023 16:47:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from peersm.com (37.59.142.98) by DAG6EX2.mxp6.local (172.16.2.52)
with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2,
cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.17; Sat, 28 Jan
2023 17:47:46 +0100
Authentication-Results: garm.ovh; auth=pass
(GARM-98R0023fa2de89-ff13-4efe-a216-9fed01b219f3,
C40A7BB909302B11E7FA7FF70FC58BEE3DF10BE8) smtp.auth=aymeric@peersm.com
X-OVh-ClientIp: 92.184.102.157
To: Andrew Poelstra <apoelstra@wpsoftware.net>, Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>, Robert Dickinson
<robert.lee.dickinson@gmail.com>
References: <CABHetKwan91zqm=0y=_84vG7ffveWTPYONZP_hLQx5o40iAnuQ@mail.gmail.com>
<Y9PPvBiWOXpBefmD@camus> <3e3acd36-44d7-6823-4eb6-69affe111204@peersm.com>
From: Aymeric Vitte <aymeric@peersm.com>
Message-ID: <b00ac602-30d5-829e-664e-d18f0e4dd762@peersm.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2023 17:47:46 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3e3acd36-44d7-6823-4eb6-69affe111204@peersm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Originating-IP: [37.59.142.98]
X-ClientProxiedBy: DAG2EX1.mxp6.local (172.16.2.11) To DAG6EX2.mxp6.local
(172.16.2.52)
X-Ovh-Tracer-GUID: 1715727b-c746-435d-8b8b-96939f611162
X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 5887049140260004829
X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK
X-VR-SPAMSCORE: -100
X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedruddvkedgledvucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuqfggjfdpvefjgfevmfevgfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecuhedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepuffvfhfhkffffgggjggtgfhisehtqhertddtfeehnecuhfhrohhmpeethihmvghrihgtucggihhtthgvuceorgihmhgvrhhitgesphgvvghrshhmrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedvledugeekhedtheekuddvgffhkedtgedtueejgeffveeghfdvvdeffeeltdfftdenucffohhmrghinhepphgvvghrshhmrdgtohhmpdhlihhnkhgvughinhdrtghomhdpghhithhhuhgsrdgtohhmnecukfhppeduvdejrddtrddtrddupdefjedrheelrddugedvrdelkeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepihhnvghtpeduvdejrddtrddtrddupdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepoegrhihmvghrihgtsehpvggvrhhsmhdrtghomheqpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedupdhrtghpthhtoheprhhosggvrhhtrdhlvggvrdguihgtkhhinhhsohhnsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdgsihhttghoihhnqdguvghvsehlihhsthhsrdhlihhnuhigfhhouhhnuggrthhiohhnrdhorhhgpdgrphhovghlshhtrhgrseifphhsohhfthifrghrvgdrnhgvthdpoffvtefjohhsthepmhhoheehvddpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhht
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 28 Jan 2023 16:56:59 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinal Inscription Size Limits
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2023 16:53:23 -0000
I saw the other posts, then storage in witness, no, ordinals no for now,
let's keep things simple and understandable
I forgot to mention that the proposals envision a "local bitcoin" (for a
metaverse for example) wich is a fork of Bitcoin code, but of course not
a fork of Bitcoin, and which of course does not store anything in the
main Bitcoin chain, but which remains compatible (tx format) and coins
between chains can be swapped
Maybe nobody care, but the idea is to put bitcoin into the party as an
alternative to this ethereum mess
Le 27/01/2023 =E0 16:43, Aymeric Vitte a =E9crit :
>
> Le 27/01/2023 =E0 14:21, Andrew Poelstra via bitcoin-dev a =E9crit :
>> if people were storing NFTs and other crap on the
>> chain, then the Bitcoin fee market would become entangled with random
>> pump&dump markets
> So you mean that Bitcoin is out for NFTs, Metaverse and "web3"?
>
> LN is good but I don't think it can really adapt to everything, what I
> proposed yesterday looks complementary
>
> I clearly dislike the current NFTs existing systems, and to make it
> short NFTs as a whole until recently, it depends on what people mean by=
> "NFT", and I did dislike any solution based on OP_RETURN (shxtty stuff
> flooding bitcoin with stupid proofs of nothing)
>
> BUT I changed my mind, one can say that I am contradicting myself
> everywhere (links in the proposals), but no, explaining why in the prop=
osals
>
> Note that in my proposals you don't need to "mint" the NFTs (using a
> third party but not a stupid ethereum/bitcoin like super sidechain) and=
> that you can reference millions of them in one transaction (low value
> NFTs like loyalty programms, discount coupons) in that case of course
> the low value NFTs are centralized
>
> That's the future, Bitcoin being out of this does not look plausible,
> currently NOBODY envisions bitcoin or LN for a web3 system, so people
> here might destroy my proposals, then please do, but I find them quite
> good compared to whatever exist
>
> =20
>
--=20
Sophia-Antipolis, France
CV: https://www.peersm.com/CVAV.pdf
LinkedIn: https://fr.linkedin.com/in/aymeric-vitte-05855b26
GitHub : https://www.github.com/Ayms
A Universal Coin Swap system based on Bitcoin: https://gist.github.com/Ay=
ms/029125db2583e1cf9c3209769eb2cdd7
A bitcoin NFT system: https://gist.github.com/Ayms/01dbfebf219965054b4a3b=
eed1bfeba7
Move your coins by yourself (browser version): https://peersm.com/wallet
Bitcoin transactions made simple: https://github.com/Ayms/bitcoin-transac=
tions
torrent-live: https://github.com/Ayms/torrent-live
node-Tor : https://www.github.com/Ayms/node-Tor
Anti-spies and private torrents, dynamic blocklist: http://torrent-live.p=
eersm.com
Peersm : http://www.peersm.com
|
