1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
|
Return-Path: <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75AC47D6
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 4 Aug 2015 16:54:40 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ig0-f173.google.com (mail-ig0-f173.google.com
[209.85.213.173])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAFD97C
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 4 Aug 2015 16:54:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by igbpg9 with SMTP id pg9so97129147igb.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 04 Aug 2015 09:54:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=3X3olvJQilEANzLaKOlODElB3CuyxKBUBwPAaxJ5NDY=;
b=BzcxePuO0yRY7KJ+jKQRkaiBqQ5dxtn00uXqt6O/2rWGl6foeN/6kW3bTX3j5ly45L
ZgiMPlfjWfQQzQgoNMAeQWFxBWIbi1Vtg81jJAG0cnEdHzFjAvItin5dV+73GbUegx39
IiazPzsMhIL4zUzJ76gOZ2qVwdaZH8XKe9YkQFLRNfj2Vk5DSY81jWENAK1a6obyMrWD
pEXJhdTy/Feu+vMM2MOUDazrqQnVLUz/DBxHQ39uETO2xihpULJtTVjeEOriXlr6ZKXN
9C1zCt10WjQTX2Cu+jrnmTJm7svRcOMAtcIAT6iLPYs0Adll1W6xzq8rbicROIz5q9c6
4UDg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.60.68 with SMTP id f4mr5170815igr.94.1438707279378; Tue,
04 Aug 2015 09:54:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.77.201 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 09:54:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20150628195053.GA9909@muck>
References: <20150625223344.GA2406@muck>
<20150628195053.GA9909@muck>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 18:54:39 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPg+sBgn-y=rBDDMeD+P0xEJiJ=XUv0Da39Cxr23NNOWzewmNw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
To: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0160b63e52c167051c7f24be
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP65 / CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY deployment
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 16:54:40 -0000
--089e0160b63e52c167051c7f24be
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 9:50 PM, Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 06:33:44PM -0400, Peter Todd wrote:
> > Thoughts? If there are no objections I'll go ahead and write that code,
> > using the same thresholds as BIP66.
>
> I've opened a pull-req to deploy CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY via the
> IsSuperMajority() mechanism:
>
> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6351
>
> Final step towards CLTV deployment on mainnet.
>
> I've copied the logic and tests from the previous BIP66 (DERSIG)
> soft-fork line-by-line for ease of review; any code review applicable
> to
> BIP66 should be applicable to BIP65.
>
ACK on merging using IsSuperMajority.
--
Pieter
--089e0160b63e52c167051c7f24be
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 9:50 PM, Peter Todd <span dir=3D"l=
tr"><<a href=3D"mailto:pete@petertodd.org" target=3D"_blank">pete@petert=
odd.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"g=
mail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;bo=
rder-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=3D"">On Thu, Jun 25,=
2015 at 06:33:44PM -0400, Peter Todd wrote:<br>
> Thoughts? If there are no objections I'll go ahead and write that =
code,<br>
> using the same thresholds as BIP66.<br>
<br>
</span>I've opened a pull-req to deploy CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY via the<br>
IsSuperMajority() mechanism:<br>
<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 <a href=3D"https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6351" rel=
=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6=
351</a><br>
<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Final step towards CLTV deployment on mainnet.<br>
<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 I've copied the logic and tests from the previous BIP66 (=
DERSIG)<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 soft-fork line-by-line for ease of review; any code review ap=
plicable to<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 BIP66 should be applicable to BIP65.<br></blockquote><div><br=
></div><div>ACK on merging using IsSuperMajority. <br><br>-- <br></div><div=
>Pieter<br><br></div></div></div></div>
--089e0160b63e52c167051c7f24be--
|
