summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/60/cfaa60b6ff1a22d67c17e030a42c090eb40214
blob: 4fedad1808dc967d6c1378132cd6202ee86a16ab (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <zgenjix@yahoo.com>) id 1Rbe72-00023J-RZ
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:10:36 +0000
X-ACL-Warn: 
Received: from nm18-vm3.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([98.138.91.148])
	by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with smtp (Exim 4.76)
	id 1Rbe71-0007YS-MV for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:10:36 +0000
Received: from [98.138.90.51] by nm18.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
	16 Dec 2011 20:10:30 -0000
Received: from [98.138.87.5] by tm4.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
	16 Dec 2011 20:10:30 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1005.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
	16 Dec 2011 20:10:30 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 446017.1471.bm@omp1005.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 64055 invoked by uid 60001); 16 Dec 2011 20:10:30 -0000
X-YMail-OSG: DnSpj8MVM1mYcpFfrl1hJu.hcKq2NJQ7xRzgcq.CZruE_jo
	ULVEDCFADkWjbVFsExsW5T33wHdcezIHP6CZ1Oz4Ig7JYLbhSC5jotocCpYi
	I2OIicLt450_uhZ59RATRcRxAG8JcbK_av_S2cHeHOtbkQoakfF034tPY2vs
	gK1aWqsOjzweLQu9hD8Rf5UFTY5L09f8tlaYZIqj__uJN5M85tQXNvdN1_MQ
	q3Glpy0sr.5L0GrdnRzZ6twcyubHGn9ZTL.izbGuswnBbgn9d19USbuj2AwH
	vQWpBaXKQDJTNFstEGoH9BKGJbyNz0dcJbounLKGUK2aqW5PpIU.WPvnDVgD
	ByUNAmTyfrExzRTbtSNEhYw03v_lY6zHeeoA8bAbsW69CBq8SRJ7bMdOPGJl
	HXAIlrThcSt4XiZ8ZFIfDbRwJ1zH2oPrKV_rz8Ffjmpjrc908oVMlXUU.hSd
	Ug94ArZgHllYH8s5YHxN7bIN9TaxNTORqFZPuen4WPccaXE3aUsDPDuqwtQ- -
Received: from [2.97.168.202] by web121004.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP;
	Fri, 16 Dec 2011 12:10:30 PST
X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.115.331698
References: <1323728469.78044.YahooMailNeo@web121012.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
	<1323979147.27319.140661012141129@webmail.messagingengine.com>
	<4EEB7E98.8030006@dot-bit.org>
	<CAJna-HjXp4XEHnbmX0HKsMDmnxoWQQMmqujN+D9nLV0Zz_omcg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1324066230.24980.YahooMailNeo@web121004.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 12:10:30 -0800 (PST)
From: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com>
To: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net"
	<bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAJna-HjXp4XEHnbmX0HKsMDmnxoWQQMmqujN+D9nLV0Zz_omcg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="-1562933420-1444682373-1324066230=:24980"
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(zgenjix[at]yahoo.com)
	-2.2 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
	domain 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
	0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Headers-End: 1Rbe71-0007YS-MV
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] [BIP 15] Aliases
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com>
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:10:36 -0000

---1562933420-1444682373-1324066230=:24980
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I think IBANs are not such a good idea. Note that as someone who has spent =
the last year of my life dealing with hundreds of bank transactions a day a=
nd interacting with the banking system (both on a technical, systematic and=
 personnel level), the entire system is a gigantic mess.=0A=0AThe banks are=
 in fact looking to us for answers. That's why we (Bitcoin Consultancy) wer=
e invited to the SWIFT conference to join their panel on bank 2.0.=0A=0AI d=
on't even mind the maxim "take everything the banks have done and do the co=
mplete opposite" :)=0A=0AI invite anyone who is skeptical to read the ECB's=
 specification on SEPA payments. It really is an example of a system made t=
o work alongside legacy systems that rely on inefficient people. The interc=
hange fees are dependent on a totally arbitrary test of merchant indifferen=
ce and various antitrust regulations.=0A=0AThese systems are usually built =
not by engineers or hackers, but by finance people. IBAN has no place in bi=
tcoin IMO.=0A=0AI don't mean to sound too critical, but I'm skeptical of it=
s usefulness. Especially when we already have bitcoin addresses with their =
own checksums- what value do IBANs add? Nothing except negatives.=0A=0A=0A=
=0A________________________________=0A From: slush <slush@centrum.cz>=0ATo:=
 Khalahan <khal@dot-bit.org> =0ACc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.n=
et =0ASent: Friday, December 16, 2011 7:54 PM=0ASubject: Re: [Bitcoin-devel=
opment] [BIP 15] Aliases=0A =0A=0AKhalahan, honestly, using namecoin for al=
iases is (for me) clean example of over-engineering. I mean - it will defin=
itely work if implemented properly. I played with a namecoin a bit (as my p=
ool was the first 'big' pool supporting merged mining), but I think there's=
 really long way to provide such alias system in namecoin and *cleanly inte=
grate it with bitcoin*. Don't forget that people who want to do lookup need=
 to maintain also namecoin blockchain with their bitcoin client. It goes ag=
ainst my instinct of keeping stuff easy.=0A=0AFor example, yesterday I impl=
emented HTTPS lookup for addresses into my fork of Electrum client. I did i=
t in 15 minutes, it works as expected, it does the job and the implementati=
on is really transparent, becuase implementation is 20 lines of code. There=
's no magic transformation, no forced "?handle=3D" parameters or whatever. =
And I don't care if somebody provide URL https://some.strange.domain/name-o=
f-my-dog?myhandle=3D5678iop&anything_else=3DTrue=0A=0AAnd everybody can do =
the same in their clients, in their merchant solutions, websites or whateve=
r. Everybody can do HTTPS lookup. But try to explain DNS, Namecoin, IIBAN, =
email aliases to other programmers...=0A=0A=0AThose IIBAN - well, why not. =
At least I see the potential in PR. So far I understand it as some teoretic=
 concept which is not supported by anything else right now. Give it few yea=
rs until it matures and then add IIBAN alias to Bitcoin client too.=0A=0AMa=
ybe I'm repeating myself already, but the way to go is to make aliases as e=
asy as possible, so everybody can implement it in their own solution and th=
us practially remove the need of using standard bitcoin addresses for norma=
l users. Using some superior technology, which is hard to implement or even=
 understand won't solve the situation, because it will ends up with some re=
ference implementation in standard client only and nobody else will use it.=
=0A=0Aslush=0A=0A=0AOn Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Khalahan <khal@dot-bit=
.org> wrote:=0A=0A =0A>Namecoin is a peer-to-peer generic name/value datast=
ore system.=0A>Don't forget it's not limited to .bit usage ! So, directly m=
apping=0A    things to .bit url would not be the optimal way of using namec=
oin.=0A>=0A>=0A------------------------------------------------------------=
------------------=0ALearn Windows Azure Live!=A0 Tuesday, Dec 13, 2011=0AM=
icrosoft is holding a special Learn Windows Azure training event for =0Adev=
elopers. It will provide a great way to learn Windows Azure and what it =0A=
provides. You can attend the event by watching it streamed LIVE online.=A0 =
=0ALearn more at http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-windowsazure=0A____________________=
___________________________=0ABitcoin-development mailing list=0ABitcoin-de=
velopment@lists.sourceforge.net=0Ahttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listi=
nfo/bitcoin-development
---1562933420-1444682373-1324066230=:24980
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html><body><div style=3D"color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:ti=
mes new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><div><span>I think IB=
ANs are not such a good idea. Note that as someone who has spent the last y=
ear of my life dealing with hundreds of bank transactions a day and interac=
ting with the banking system (both on a technical, systematic and personnel=
 level), the entire system is a gigantic mess.</span></div><div><br><span><=
/span></div><div><span>The banks are in fact looking to us for answers. Tha=
t's why we (Bitcoin Consultancy) were invited to the SWIFT conference to jo=
in their panel on bank 2.0.</span></div><div><br><span></span></div><div><s=
pan>I don't even mind the maxim "take everything the banks have done and do=
 the complete opposite" :)</span></div><div><br><span></span></div><div><sp=
an>I invite anyone who is skeptical to read the ECB's specification on SEPA=
 payments. It really is an example of a system made to work alongside
 legacy systems that rely on inefficient people. The interchange fees are d=
ependent on a totally arbitrary test of merchant indifference and various a=
ntitrust regulations.</span></div><div><br><span></span></div><div><span>Th=
ese systems are usually built not by engineers or hackers, but by finance p=
eople. IBAN has no place in bitcoin IMO.</span></div><div><br><span></span>=
</div><div><span>I don't mean to sound too critical, but I'm skeptical of i=
ts usefulness. Especially when we already have bitcoin addresses with their=
 own checksums- what value do IBANs add? Nothing except negatives.<br></spa=
n></div><div><br></div>  <div style=3D"font-family: times new roman, new yo=
rk, times, serif; font-size: 12pt;"> <div style=3D"font-family: times new r=
oman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 12pt;"> <font face=3D"Arial" size=
=3D"2"> <hr size=3D"1">  <b><span style=3D"font-weight:bold;">From:</span><=
/b> slush &lt;slush@centrum.cz&gt;<br> <b><span style=3D"font-weight:
 bold;">To:</span></b> Khalahan &lt;khal@dot-bit.org&gt; <br><b><span style=
=3D"font-weight: bold;">Cc:</span></b> bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforg=
e.net <br> <b><span style=3D"font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Friday, D=
ecember 16, 2011 7:54 PM<br> <b><span style=3D"font-weight: bold;">Subject:=
</span></b> Re: [Bitcoin-development] [BIP 15] Aliases<br> </font> <br>=0A<=
meta http-equiv=3D"x-dns-prefetch-control" content=3D"off"><div id=3D"yiv12=
26468051">Khalahan, honestly, using namecoin for aliases is (for me) clean =
example of over-engineering. I mean - it will definitely work if implemente=
d properly. I played with a namecoin a bit (as my pool was the first 'big' =
pool supporting merged mining), but I think there's really long way to prov=
ide such alias system in namecoin and *cleanly integrate it with bitcoin*. =
Don't forget that people who want to do lookup need to maintain also nameco=
in blockchain with their bitcoin client. It goes against my instinct of kee=
ping stuff easy.<div>=0A=0A<br></div><div>For example, yesterday I implemen=
ted HTTPS lookup for addresses into my fork of Electrum client. I did it in=
 15 minutes, it works as expected, it does the job and the implementation i=
s really transparent, becuase implementation is 20 lines of code. There's n=
o magic transformation, no forced "?handle=3D" parameters or whatever. And =
I don't care if somebody provide URL <a rel=3D"nofollow" target=3D"_blank" =
href=3D"https://some.strange.domain/name-of-my-dog?myhandle=3D5678iop&amp;a=
nything_else=3DTrue">https://some.strange.domain/name-of-my-dog?myhandle=3D=
5678iop&amp;anything_else=3DTrue</a></div>=0A=0A<div><br></div><div>And eve=
rybody can do the same in their clients, in their merchant solutions, websi=
tes or whatever. Everybody can do HTTPS lookup. But try to explain DNS, Nam=
ecoin, IIBAN, email aliases to other programmers...<br>=0A=0A<div><br></div=
><div>Those IIBAN - well, why not. At least I see the potential in PR. So f=
ar I understand it as some teoretic concept which is not supported by anyth=
ing else right now. Give it few years until it matures and then add IIBAN a=
lias to Bitcoin client too.</div>=0A=0A<div><br></div><div>Maybe I'm repeat=
ing myself already, but the way to go is to make aliases as easy as possibl=
e, so everybody can implement it in their own solution and thus practially =
remove the need of using standard bitcoin addresses for normal users. Using=
 some superior technology, which is hard to implement or even understand wo=
n't solve the situation, because it will ends up with some reference implem=
entation in standard client only and nobody else will use it.</div>=0A=0A<d=
iv><br></div><div>slush<br><br><div class=3D"yiv1226468051gmail_quote">On F=
ri, Dec 16, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Khalahan <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a rel=3D"nofol=
low" ymailto=3D"mailto:khal@dot-bit.org" target=3D"_blank" href=3D"mailto:k=
hal@dot-bit.org">khal@dot-bit.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote clas=
s=3D"yiv1226468051gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #=
ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">=0A=0A<u></u>=0A=0A  =0A    =0A  =0A  <div><di=
v><div class=3D"yiv1226468051h5">=0A    Namecoin is a peer-to-peer generic =
name/value datastore system.<br>=0A    Don't forget it's not limited to .bi=
t usage ! So, directly mapping=0A    things to .bit url would not be the op=
timal way of using namecoin.<br><br></div></div></div></blockquote></div></=
div></div>=0A</div><meta http-equiv=3D"x-dns-prefetch-control" content=3D"o=
n"><br>--------------------------------------------------------------------=
----------<br>Learn Windows Azure Live!&nbsp; Tuesday, Dec 13, 2011<br>Micr=
osoft is holding a special Learn Windows Azure training event for <br>devel=
opers. It will provide a great way to learn Windows Azure and what it <br>p=
rovides. You can attend the event by watching it streamed LIVE online.&nbsp=
; <br>Learn more at <a href=3D"http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-windowsazure" target=
=3D"_blank">http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-windowsazure</a><br>____________________=
___________________________<br>Bitcoin-development mailing list<br><a ymail=
to=3D"mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net" href=3D"mailto:Bitc=
oin-development@lists.sourceforge.net">Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforg=
e.net</a><br><a href=3D"https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoi=
n-development"
 target=3D"_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-dev=
elopment</a><br><br><br> </div> </div>  </div></body></html>
---1562933420-1444682373-1324066230=:24980--