1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
|
Return-Path: <ctpacia@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE53E892
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 9 Aug 2015 21:40:50 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-io0-f178.google.com (mail-io0-f178.google.com
[209.85.223.178])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CBDDEA
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 9 Aug 2015 21:40:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ioeg141 with SMTP id g141so153414038ioe.3
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 09 Aug 2015 14:40:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=V4p513LE4jad6faf9uyAgwPytlSd7GI3SnJnfmnNieg=;
b=kT5+VcXgX2VwMeNcPbI8edYF5N9cEg0aIzVyk+9xOrttq4DHsNpLIYITsjPmHNICqI
VasGYXMdUYk+Y5TwfqphKLba02Xubu761OXgTEwpQztLvgI1/5V4Ht0zPS44PGMDVIny
7Fc5wAPin6k9Il7PDwBRQMcViqA7b8x5apRu5IQ6rkNKMFtlc/8sWZZ9Jlir6vYfcJeS
Maugnxt0P5kUv5+HcDP7g3+d2zDpnUmazHTh1pt1RdM61GSRxtUYgtFlX8XoA8UYUIz0
HCNYen0Pz+iHyrhsRNFlUg81WGJSFipIfKkEaCesB2Tqbi3bG8KkmADlcN/2BInvVTt+
kJVg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.47.219 with SMTP id v88mr16541899iov.78.1439156449685;
Sun, 09 Aug 2015 14:40:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.144.196 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Aug 2015 14:40:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.144.196 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Aug 2015 14:40:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CALJP9GDMgqn2VeR4y4RVxqJ_iW57hExwXBHNSkxo+-AK+7Zb6g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPg+sBj-wA1DMrwkQRWnzQoB5NR-q=2-5=WDAAUYfSpXRZSTqw@mail.gmail.com>
<CABsx9T1NqBX9Tr8vRCtCeri76e0wrtkvRhEPyG9Advv_3Uqxng@mail.gmail.com>
<CAPg+sBjwVxYTOn3+bwahHGSGpBh5BCh5b4OOFkw_2x97YZSFPQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+w+GKS_wDDgf=HjPgD5QZ_wdTRg7i_oYUgBRmh9HpufETAP=w@mail.gmail.com>
<CABm2gDqvpWdHdjo1OBzbw-6ivu5DEGcfvK8duc3-KAjsSeWapA@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+w+GKRPPcgCO0pBP2PjKGU49tWuBoF1vRJzY+4fWn71HOVDPw@mail.gmail.com>
<CABm2gDqV1NdHJZBmUWX3AxVYy6ErU7AB-wsWgGzbiTL1twdq6g@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+w+GKTLBWj6b4ppwrmnXb_gybYFcrX7haLBSdCnMaijy2An4w@mail.gmail.com>
<CABm2gDpWPhYNh=g-ZXCsfe-aPq=N6NKSWKP9kr-KtPVrWAxB7Q@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAO2FKHsczkwwqO87cJFtxBp9JE=vf=GcxLx37GpRUkPq8VGHQ@mail.gmail.com>
<55C79FF0.8040100@thinlink.com>
<CAOG=w-skYq84=PtN45FB-dGoY1783Jz7K1T16e2JVGjLazWuyA@mail.gmail.com>
<CALJP9GDMgqn2VeR4y4RVxqJ_iW57hExwXBHNSkxo+-AK+7Zb6g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2015 17:40:49 -0400
Message-ID: <CAB+qUq7Zz=a=TZXVZ3s3d5BR+fME0eGWVPXaneg79Ch4fVpgcQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Chris Pacia <ctpacia@gmail.com>
To: Tom Harding <tomh@thinlink.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c14e92f5ba02051ce7b818
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAD_CREDIT,BAYES_00,
DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] What Lightning Is
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2015 21:40:51 -0000
--001a11c14e92f5ba02051ce7b818
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
I'm glad Tom is bringing these points up. There seems to be an assumption
by many that LN will be automatically awesome by virtue of it being
technically feasible with having considered whether it is economically
feasible or desirable.
So much stock has been placed in LN as the solution to the block size
debate, yet it could turn out that it sucks in practice. Then what?
On Aug 9, 2015 5:27 PM, "Tom Harding via bitcoin-dev" <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Aug 9, 2015 11:54 AM, "Mark Friedenbach" <mark@friedenbach.org> wrote:
>
> > On the contrary the funds were advanced by the hub on the creation of
> the channel. There is no credit involved.
>
> That's a chuckle.
>
> As I said, nothing requires the hub to advance anything, and if it does,
> Bob can expect to pay for it.
>
> We'll see whether hubs assess a fee for depositing funds, whether the fee
> depends on the amount deposited, and whether it depends on the amount of
> time it stays there.
>
> I predict "all of the above." There is a name for these kinds of fees.
> Can you guess it?
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
>
--001a11c14e92f5ba02051ce7b818
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<p dir=3D"ltr">I'm glad Tom is bringing these points up. There seems to=
be an assumption by many that LN will be automatically awesome by virtue o=
f it being technically feasible with having considered whether it is econom=
ically feasible or desirable. </p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">So much stock has been placed in LN as the solution to the b=
lock size debate, yet it could turn out that it sucks in practice. Then wha=
t?</p>
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Aug 9, 2015 5:27 PM, "Tom Harding via bi=
tcoin-dev" <<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org=
">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>> wrote:<br type=3D"attributi=
on"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-lef=
t:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><p dir=3D"ltr">On Aug 9, 2015 11:54 AM, =
"Mark Friedenbach" <<a href=3D"mailto:mark@friedenbach.org" ta=
rget=3D"_blank">mark@friedenbach.org</a>> wrote:</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">> On the contrary the funds were advanced by the hub on t=
he creation of the channel. There is no credit involved.<br></p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">That's a chuckle.=C2=A0 </p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">As I said, nothing requires the hub to advance anything, and=
if it does, Bob can expect to pay for it.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">We'll see whether hubs assess a fee for depositing funds=
, whether the fee depends on the amount deposited, and whether it depends o=
n the amount of time it stays there.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">I predict "all of the above." There is a name for =
these kinds of fees.=C2=A0 Can you guess it?<br></p>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.=
linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail=
man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div>
--001a11c14e92f5ba02051ce7b818--
|
